Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Orthographic neighbourhood in Czech language and its use in research of reading impairment Cover

Orthographic neighbourhood in Czech language and its use in research of reading impairment

Open Access
|Jul 2020

References

  1. Andrews, S., Hersch, J., 2010. Lexical Precision in Skilled Readers: Individual Differences in Masked Neighbor Priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 139(2), 299—318, available at: .10.1037/a0018366
  2. Clarkson, L., Roodenrys, S., Miller, L. M. et al., 2017. The phonological neighbourhood effect on short-term memory for order. Memory (Hove, England), 25(3), 391–402, available at: .10.1080/09658211.2016.1179330
  3. Davies, R., Cuetos, F. Glez-Seijas, R. M., 2007. Reading development and dyslexia in a transparent orthography: a survey of Spanish children. Annals of Dyslexia, 57(2), 179-198, avaiable at .10.1007/s11881-007-0010-1
  4. Davis, C. J., 2005. N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37(1), 65–70, available at: .10.3758/BF03206399
  5. Ghyselinck, M., Lewis, M. B., Brysbaert, M., 2004. Age of acquisition and the cumulative-frequency hypothesis: A review of the literature and a new multi-task investigation. Acta Psychologica, 115(1), 43–67, available at: .10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.11.002
  6. González-Nosti, M., Barbón, A., Rodríguez-Fereiro J. et al., 2014. Effects of the psycholinguistic variables on the lexical decision task in Spanish: A study with 2,765 words. Behavior Research Methods. 46(2), 517–525, available at: .10.3758/s13428-013-0383-5
  7. Grainger, J., 2017. Orthographic Processing: a „Mid-Level“ Vision of Reading. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 71(2), 1–72, available at: .10.1080/17470218.2017.1314515
  8. Grainger, J., Muneaux, M., Farioli, F. et al., 2005. Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 58(6), 981–998, available at: 10.1080/02724980443000386
  9. Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., 2016. Reading disorders and dyslexia. Current opinion in pediatrics, 28(6), 731–735, available at: <https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000411>.10.1097/MOP.0000000000000411
  10. Jirásková, M., 2019. Dyslexie ve speciálněpedagogickém a neurovědeckém pojetí se zaměřením na fonologické zpracování, Diploma thesis, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Olomouc, The Czech Republic.
  11. Juhasz, B. J., Yap, M. J., Raoul, A., Kaye, M., 2019. A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(1), 82–96, available at: .10.1037/xlm0000564
  12. Karanth, P., 2004. Cross-linguistic study of acquired reading disorders. Springer US, available at: .
  13. Křen, M., Cvrček, V., Čapka, T. et al., 2015. SYN2015: reprezentativní korpus psané češtiny. Ústav Čes kého národního korpusu FF UK, Praha, available at: .
  14. Laxon, V., Gallagher A., Masterson, J. 2002. The effects of familiarity, orthographic neighbourhood density, letter-length and graphemic complexity on children’s reading accuracy. British journal of psychology. 93(2), 269–287, available at: .
  15. Marian, V., Bartolotti, J., Chabal, S. et al., 2012. Clearpond: Cross-Linguistic Easy-Access Resource for Phonological and Orthographic Neighborhood Densities. PLoS ONE. 7(8), 1–11, available at .10.1371/journal.pone.0043230
  16. Penolazzi, B., Spironelli C., Angrilli, A., 2009. Children and Language: Development, Impairment and Training. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, pp. 113–145. ISBN 9781606923955.
  17. Share, D. L., 2008. On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: the perils of overreliance on an „outlier“ orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615, available at: .10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
  18. Schloss, B. J., 2017. Predicting Concept Evolution during Naturalistic Reading with Simultaneous Eye-tracking and fMRI, Master thesis, The Pennsylvania State University.
  19. Schroeter, P., Schroeder, S., 2014. Differences in visual word recognition between L1 and L2 speakers the impact of length, frequency, and orthographic neighborhood size in German children. Studies in second language acquisition. 40(2), 319–339, available at: .10.1017/S0272263117000201
  20. Šmerk, P., 2007. Fast Morphological Analysis of Czech. In Sojka P., Horák A. (Eds.), Proceedings of Third Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN 2009. Brno: Masaryk University, pp. 13–16. ISBN 978-80-210-5048-8.
  21. Weekes, B., Castles, A., Davies, R., 2006. Effects of Consistency and Age of Acquisition on Reading and Spelling among Developing Readers. Reading. 19(2), 133–169, available at: .10.1007/s11145-005-2032-6
  22. Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., Yap, M., 2008. Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin 15(5), 971-979, available at: .10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
Language: English
Page range: 54 - 59
Submitted on: Jun 1, 2020
Accepted on: Jun 1, 2020
Published on: Jul 24, 2020
Published by: Palacký University Olomouc
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2020 Monika Ptáčková, Kateřina Vitásková, published by Palacký University Olomouc
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.