References
- [1] Barwise, J., 1977. An introduction to first-order logic. In Barwise, J. (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical logic. London: Elsevier, pp. 5–46.
- [2] McCawley, J. D., 1993. Everything that linguists have always wanted to know about logic…but were ashamed to ask. 2nd edn. London: Blackwell.
- [3] Collins, C., Postal, P., 2016. Interclausal NEG raising and the scope of negation. <https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/002891>.
- [4] Zwarts, F., 1996. Facets of negation. In Van der Does, J., van Eijck, J. (Eds.), Quantifiers, logic, and language. Stanford, California: CSLI, pp. 385–421.
- [5] Lakoff, G., 1970. Linguistics and natural logic. Synthese, 22(1–2), 151–271.
- [6] van Benthem, J., 1988. The semantics of variety in categorial grammars. In Buszkowski, W., Marciszewski, W., van Benthem, J. (Eds.), Categorial grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 33–55.
- [7] van Benthem, J., 1991. Language in action: categories, lambdas and dynamic logic. Studies in Logic. North-Holland.
- [8] Sánchez Valencia, V., 1991. Studies on natural logic and categorial grammar. PhD thesis, University Amsterdam.
- [9] MacCartney, B., Manning, C., 2009. An extended model of natural logic. In Proceedings of the eighth international conference on computational semantics, 140–156. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Association for Computational Linguistics. <http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W09-3714>
- [10] Krivochen, D., Schmerling, S. F., 2016. Two kinds of coordination and their theoretical implications: rethinking structural uniformity. Ms. <https://www.academia.edu/13207764/_2016_Two_kinds_of_coordination_and_their_theoretical_implications>
- [11] Krivochen, D., 2016. Divide and…conquer? On the limits of algorithmic approaches to syntactic- semantic structure. Czech and Slovak Linguistic Review, 1, 15–37.
- [12] Schmerling, S. F., 1975. Asymmetric conjunction and rules of conversation. In Cole, P., Morgan, J. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, 211–231. New York: Academic Press.
- [13] Culicover, P. W., 2013. OM-sentences. In Culicover, P. W., Explaining syntax, 15–52. Oxford: OUP.
- [14] Ross, J. R., 1967. Constraints on variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
- [15] Williams, E., 1978. Across-the-Board rule application. Linguistic Inquiry, 9(1), 31–43.
- [16] Postal, P. M., 1998. Three investigations on extraction. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
- [17] Fillmore, C., 1963. The position of embedding transformations in a grammar. Word, 19(2), 208–231.10.1080/00437956.1963.11659796
- [18] Horn, L. R., 1972. On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. PhD Dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.
- [19] Horn, L. R., 1978. Remarks on Neg-raising. In Cole, P. (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 9: pragmatics, 129–220. New York: Academic Press.
- [20] Collins, C., Postal, P., 2014. Classical NEG raising. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
- [21] Collins, C., Postal, P. 2017. Interclausal NEG raising and the scope of negation. Glossa: Journal of General Linguistics, 2(1), 1–29.
- [22] Horn, L. R., 2014. The cloud of unknowing. In Hoeksema, J., Gilbers, D. (Eds.), Black book: a festschrift in honor of Frans Zwarts. Groningen: University of Groningen, pp. 78–96.
- [23] Carden, G., 1970. A note on conflicting idiolects. Linguistic Inquiry, 1(3), 281–290.
- [24] Goodall, G., 1984. Parallel structures in syntax. PhD Thesis, University of California, San Diego.
- [25] Chomsky, N., 1970. Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. In Jakobson, R., Kawamoto, S. (Eds.), Studies in general and oriental linguistics presented to Shirô Hattori on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday. Tokyo: TEC Corporation for Language and Education Research, pp. 52–91.
- [26] Schmerling, S. F., 2018. Sound and grammar: towards a Neo-Sapirian theory of language. London: Brill.
- [27] Schmerling, S. F., 1972. Apparent counterexamples to the coordinate structure constraint: a canonical conspiracy. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 2(1), 91–104.
- [28] Goldsmith, J., 1985. A principled exception to the coordinate structure constraint. Papers from the general session at the twenty-first regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. University of Chicago, Illinois. Available online at <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/244998803_A_Principled_Exception_to_the_Coordinate_Structure_Constraint> [Accessed on 13/6/2015].
- [29] Lakoff, G., 1986. Frame semantic control of the coordinate structure constraint. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society.
- [30] Na, Y., Huck, G., 1992. On extracting from asymmetrical structures. In Brentari, D., Larson, G. N., MacLeod, L. A. (Eds.), The joy of grammar: a festschrift in honor of James D. McCawley. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 251–274.
- [31] Partee, B., 2011. Formal semantics: origins, issues, early impact. In Partee, B., Glanzberg, M., Šķilters, J. (Eds.), Formal semantics and pragmatics. Discourse, context, and models. The Baltic yearbook of cognition, logic, and communication, vol. 6. Manhattan: New Prairie Press, pp. 1–52.
- [32] Zeijlstra, H., 2018. Does Neg-raising involve Neg-raising? Topoi, 37(3), 417–433.