Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Impact of copper deficiency in cows on immune system function in offspring: a study using lymphocyte immunophenotyping Cover

Impact of copper deficiency in cows on immune system function in offspring: a study using lymphocyte immunophenotyping

Open Access
|Aug 2026

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Gating strategy for bovine lymphocyte immunophenotyping. Single cells were selected in a forward-scatter (FSC) pulse area (A) vs FSC pulse height (H) plot. Lymphocytes were identified/gated in an FSC-A vs side-scatter (SSC)-A plot based on their size and granularity, and their fluorescences were gated in SSC-A to fluorescence histograms

Table 1.

Results of biochemical and haematological tests on cows and calves

ParameterReference range (19)Normocupraemic cows, subgroup IaNormocupraemic calves, subgroup IbHypocupraemic cows, subgroup IIaHypocupraemic calves, subgroup IIb
Cu (μmol/L)12–2013.35 ± 1.50a13.45 ± 0.66a10.25 ± 1.18b11.83 ± 1.68ab
Fe (μmol/L)21.5–35.827.50 ± 1.33a23.70 ± 1.66b31.90 ± 3.98a25.25 ± 4.33ab
WBC ×109/L6.25–9.59.50 ± 3.89a10.03 ± 1.34a6.60 ± 1.61b9.70 ± 3.97a
GP (%)0–23.00 ± 1.001.50 ± 0.713.67 ± 3.792.00 ± 0.00
GS (%)23–3744.50 ± 15.8031.50 ± 15.5939.50 ± 10.8535.67 ± 24.54
L (%)53–6749.00 ± 13.3464.00 ± 15.0152.25 ± 9.6460.67 ± 21.46
M (%)0–42.00 ± 0.002.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00
RBC (×1012/L)5.0–7.07.23 ± 0.46a9.24 ± 0.93b7.08 ± 0.57a8.50 ± 1.91ab
HGB (g/L)105–140114 ± 1.83a110.00 ± 1.83a101.75 ± 8.22b101.00 ± 1.84b
HCT (L/L)0.3–0.40.35 ± 0.01a0.31 ± 0.02ab0.29 ± 0.02b0.29 ± 0.07b
MCV (fL)40–6048.75 ± 2.99a36.00 ± 3.46ab46.00 ± 6.98ab36.00 ± 1.73b
MCH (fmol/L)0.9–1.50.98 ± 0.06a0.71 ± 0.05b0.87 ± 0.10c0.70 ± 0.03b
MCHC (mmol/L)16–2120.06 ± 0.3119.81 ± 0.6219.40 ± 0.2219.59 ± 0.57
PLT (×109/L)200–800635 ± 164.04a807.25 ± 253.80b856.00 ± 83.63b815.00 ± 145.66b

1 GP – granulocytes; GS – segmented granulocytes; L – lymphocytes; M – monocytes; concentrations are given as means ± SD;

1a, b and c – values in a row with different superscript letters differ significantly at α = 0.05

Table 2.

Lymphocyte immunophenotypes in cow and calf serum

Normocupraemic cows, subgroup IaNormocupraemic calves, subgroup IbHypocupraemic cows, subgroup IIaHypocupraemic calves, subgroup IIb
TCD8%8.99 ± 0.72a7.45 ± 0.12a13.35 ± 2.61b13.18 ± 4.73b
TCD4%23.19 ± 2.85a16.12 ± 1.54b27.60 ± 5.03ac19.31 ± 3.91b
CD4+:CD8+ ratio2.58 ± 0.23a2.16 ± 0.17a2.14 ± 0.56a1.54 ± 0.36b
BCD21%26.35 ± 2.04a26.5 ± 4.72a24.88 ± 6.27a17.01 ± 14.30b
MHC II%45.12 ± 4.38a45.35 ± 16.99a36.15 ± 5.87b29.74 ± 16.20b

1 TCD4+ – CD4 T helper cells; TCD8+ – CD8 T helper cells; MHC II – major histocompatibility complex class II; BCD21 – CD21 B cells; values are given as means ± SD;

1a, b and c – values in a row with different superscript letters differ significantly at α = 0.05

Fig. 2.

Representative flow cytometric dot plots of peripheral blood lymphocytes in cows with hypocupraemia and healthy control animals. A – healthy cows; B – cows with hypocupraemia. SSC – side scatter; A – pulse area; MHC II – major histocompatibility complex class II; PE – phycoerythrin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2026-0040 | Journal eISSN: 2450-8608 (formerly 2300-3235)
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 13, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 7, 2026
Published on: Aug 12, 2026
Published by: National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Beata Abramowicz, Łukasz Kurek, Urszula Lisiecka, Katarzyna Żarczyńska, Anna Szczotka-Bochniarz, published by National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.