High maternal body condition score in beef cattle: gut microbiota dysbiosis, immune dysregulation and offspring health implications

Chi, Liang; Yue, Yukun; Cao, Rui; Zhang, Xinxin; Wang, Sishuang; Li, Jingxian; Bing, Yuhan; Wang, Ruiguo; Liu, Huanqi

doi:10.2478/jvetres-2025-0068

Abstract

Introduction

This study investigates the correlation between intestinal flora and body condition score (BCS) in beef cattle, focusing on the impact of maternal body condition on gut microbiota and immune function in both cows and their offspring.

Material and Methods

Faecal and blood samples were collected at various stages before and after parturition from Hereford beef cattle categorised into normal, higher and high BCS groups. Microbial DNA was extracted and analysed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing to assess microbial diversity and community structure.

Results

The research indicated that while maternal BCS had minimal impact on the gut microbiota of cows before and after parturition, significant differences were observed in the microbial composition of calf gut microbiota, particularly those of calves born to cows with higher BCS. Calves from high-BCS cows exhibited increased levels of Proteobacteria, a potential marker for dysbiosis. Immune function analysis revealed higher levels of interleukin 6 and tumour necrosis factor α in both cows and calves from higher-BCS groups, suggesting a link between maternal obesity and offspring health risks.

Conclusion

The findings point to the importance of managing body condition in pregnant cows to optimise calf health and reduce disease risks and to the linked role of gut microbiota.

References

Bolyen E., Rideout J.R., Dillon M.R., Bokulich N.A., Abnet C.C., Al-Ghalith G.A., Alexander H., Alm E.J., Arumugam M., Asnicar F., Bai Y., Bisanz J.E., Bittinger K., Brejnrod A., Brislawn C.J., Brown C.T., Callahan B.J., Caraballo-Rodríguez A.M., Chase J., Cope E.K., Da Silva R., Diener C., Dorrestein P.C., Douglas G.M., Durall D.M., Duvallet C., Edwardson C.F., Ernst M., Estaki M., Fouquier J., Gauglitz J.M., Gibbons S.M., Gibson D.L., Gonzalez A., Gorlick K., Guo J., Hillmann B., Holmes S., Holste H., Huttenhower C., Huttley G.A., Janssen S., Jarmusch A.K., Jiang L., Kaehler B.D., Kang K.B., Keefe C.R., Keim P., Kelley S.T., Knights D., Koester I., Kosciolek T., Kreps J., Langille M.G.I., Lee J., Ley R., Liu Y.-X., Loftfield E., Lozupone C., Maher M., Marotz C., Martin B.D., McDonald D., McIver L.J., Melnik A.V., Metcalf J.L., Morgan S.C., Morton J.T., Naimey A.T., Navas-Molina J.A., Nothias L.F., Orchanian S.B., Pearson T., Peoples S.L., Petras D., Preuss M.L., Pruesse E., Rasmussen L.B., Rivers A., Michael S. Robeson M.S. II, Rosenthal P., Segata N., Shaffer M., Shiffer A., Sinha R., Song S.J., Spear J.R., Swafford A.D., Thompson L.R., Torres P.J., Trinh P., Tripathi A., Turnbaugh P.J., Ul-Hasan S., van der Hooft J.J.J., Vargas F., Vázquez-Baeza Y., Vogtmann E., von Hippel M., Walters W., Wan Y., Wang M., Warren J., Weber K.C., Williamson C.H.D., Willis A.D., Xu Z.-Z., Zaneveld J.R., Zhang Y., Zhu Q., Knight R., Caporaso J.G.: Reproducible, interactive, scalable, and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME2. Nat Biotechnol 2019, 37, 852–857, doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Crost E.H., Coletto E., Bell A., Juge N.: Ruminococcus gnavus: friend or foe for human health. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2023, 47, 1–23, doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuad014.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Desta A.G.: The effect of crude protein and energy on conception of dairy cow: a review. Discov Anim 2024, 1, 29, doi: 10.1007/s44338-024-00030-1.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Edgar R.C.: UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 2013, 10, 996–998, doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2604.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fontes P.L.P., Bromfield J.J., Pohler K.G., Lamb G.C.: Impact of paternal high energy diets on semen quality and embryo development in cattle. Reprod Fertil2025, 6, e240082, doi: 10.1530/RAF-24-0082.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gaillard R., Welten M., Oddy W.H., Beilin L., Mori T., Jaddoe V.W., Huang R.C.: Associations of maternal prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with cardio-metabolic risk factors in adolescent offspring: a prospective cohort study. BJOG 2016, 123, 207–216, doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13700.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gillund P., Reksen O., Gröhn Y., Karlberg K.: Body condition related to ketosis and reproductive performance in Norwegian dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2001, 84, 1390–1396, doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)70170-1.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kojima T., Oishi K., Naoto A., Matsubara Y., Toshiki U., Fukushima Y., Inoue G., Sato S., Shiraishi T., Hirooka H., Masuda T.: Estimation of beef cow body condition score: a machine learning approach using three-dimensional image data and a simple approach with heart girth measurements. Livestock Sci 2022, 256, 104816, doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104816.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Laplanche V., Armiento S., Speciale I., Šuligoj T., Crost E.H., Lamprinaki D., Vaux L. Gotts K., De Castro C., Juge N.: The human gut symbiont Ruminococcus gnavus displays strain specific exopolysaccharides modulating the host immune response. Carbohydr Polym 2025, 347, 122754, doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122754.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Magoč T., Salzberg S.L.: FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2957–2963, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maidak B.L., Olsen G.J., Larsen N., Overbeek R., McCaughey M.J., Woese C.R.: The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP). Nucl Acids Res 1997, 25, 109–110.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Malmuthuge N., Guan L.L.: Understanding host-microbial interactions in rumen: searching the best opportunity for microbiota manipulation. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2017, 8, 8, doi: 10.1186/s40104-016-0135-3.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marti A., Marcos A., Martinez J.A.: Obesity and immune function relationships. Obes Rev 2001, 2, 131–140, doi: 10.1046/j.1467-789x.2001.00025.x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Philippot L., Spor A., Hénault C., Bru D., Bizouard F., Jones C.M., Sarr A., Maron P.-A.: Loss in microbial diversity affects nitrogen cycling in soil. ISME J 2013, 7, 1609–1619, doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.34.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Price M.N., Dehal P.S., Arkin A.P.: FastTree 2 – approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 2010, 5, e9490, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reksen O., Havrevoll Ø., Gröhn Y.T., Bolstad T., Waldmann A., Ropstad E.: Relationships among body condition score, milk constituents, and postpartum luteal function in Norwegian dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2002, 85, 1406–1415, doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74208-2.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Segata N., Izard J., Waldron L., Gevers D., Miropolsky L., Garrett W.S., Huttenhower C.: Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol 2011, 12, R60, doi: 10.1186/gb-2011- 12-6-r60.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shin N.-R., Whon T.W., Bae J.-W.: Proteobacteria: microbial signature of dysbiosis in gut microbiota. Trends Biotechnol 2015. 33, 496–503, doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.06.011.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Snijders A.M., Langley S.A., Kim Y.-M., Brislawn C.J., Noecker C., Zink E.M., Fansler S.J., Casey C.P., Miller D.R., Huang Y., Karpen D.H., Celniker S.E., Brown J.B., Borenstein E., Jansson J.K., Metz T.O,, Mao J.-H.: Influence of early life exposure, host genetics and diet on the mouse gut microbiome and metabolome. Nat Microbiol 2016, 2, 16221, doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.221.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Terry S.A., Basarab J.A., Guan L.L., McAllister T.A.: Strategies to improve the efficiency of beef cattle production. Can J Anim Sci 2020, 101, 1–19, doi: 10.1139/cjas-2020-0022.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Turnbaugh P.J., Ley R.E., Mahowald M.A., Magrini V., Mardis E.R., Gordon J.I.: An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 2006, 444, 1027–1031, doi: 10.1038/nature05414.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang L., Wu D., Zhang Y., Li K., Wang M., Ma J.: Dynamic distribution of gut microbiota in cattle at different breeds and health states. Front Microbio 2023, 14, 1113730, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1113730.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
White J.R., Nagarajan N., Pop M.: Statistical methods for detecting differentially abundant features in clinical metagenomic samples. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009, 5, e1000352, doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000352.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Xu Q., Qiao Q., Gao Y., Hou J., Hu M., Du Y., Zhao K., Li X.: Gut microbiota and their role in health and metabolic disease of dairy cow. Front Nutr 2021, 8, 701511, doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.701511.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article