Fig 1.

Validation results for total recovery by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry for the determination of isoxazoline derivatives in plasma from clinically healthy dogs, cats and humans and validation results for matrix effect
| Validation test | Dog | Cat | Human | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluralaner | Sarolaner | Lotilaner | Afoxolaner | Fluralaner | Sarolaner | Lotilaner | Afoxolaner | Fluralaner | Sarolaner | Lotilaner | Afoxolaner | ||
| Total recovery (%) | Mean | 13.10 | 13.90 | 10.10 | 13.90 | 11.15 | 14.10 | 9.80 | 13.6 | 12.10 | 13.00 | 11.93 | 10.70 |
| SD | 2.10 | 1.80 | 1.18 | 2.00 | 1.43 | 1.12 | 2.50 | 2.20 | 2.90 | 0.80 | 0.90 | 1.10 | |
| Matrix effect (%) | Mean | 8.90 | 13.90 | 13.30 | 12.10 | 12.20 | 9.80 | 9.50 | 11.90 | 13.60 | 13.70 | 8.93 | 9.60 |
| SD | 1.54 | 1.89 | 1.04 | 2.03 | 2.12 | 2.34 | 2.12 | 1.07 | 1.14 | 2.01 | 1.08 | 1.71 | |
Validation results of an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of sarolaner in clinically healthy laying hen plasma
| Linearity | r2 | I | II | III | IV | V | Mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | |||
| Precision (%) and accuracy (%) | Intra-day, n = 6; 3 replications | LLOQ | LQC | IQC | MQC | HQC | ||
| Precision | I | 9.67 | 6.07 | 1.67 | 2.34 | 2,04 | ||
| Accuracy | 5.00 | 4.67 | 1.35 | 3.86 | 1,36 | |||
| Precision | II | 14.48 | 3.87 | 3.95 | 4.22 | 7,49 | ||
| Accuracy | 11.67 | 3.00 | 2.67 | 4.66 | 5,16 | |||
| Inter-day, n = 18 | Precision | III | 10.95 | 1.79 | 2.08 | 6.71 | 5,10 | |
| Accuracy | 6.67 | 1.33 | 1.65 | 7.08 | 3,33 | |||
| Precision | 11.70 | 3.91 | 2.57 | 6.02 | 4.88 | |||
| Accuracy | 7.78 | 3.00 | 1.89 | 3.33 | 3.28 | |||
| Concentration (ng/mL) | S/N | |||||||
| LLOQ and LOD | LLOQ overall mean, n = 18 | 1.00 | 91.48 | |||||
| LLOQ overall SD, n = 18 | 0.12 | 4.74 | ||||||
| LOD overall mean, n = 18 | 0.5 | 4.01 | ||||||
| LOD overall SD, n = 18 | 0.36 | 0.02 | ||||||
| Sample | Total recovery (%) | |||||||
| Total recovery | Mean | 1 ng/mL | 99.78 | |||||
| 1,500 ng/mL | 96.21 | |||||||
| SD | 1 ng/mL | 14.09 | ||||||
| 1,500 ng/mL | 7.47 | |||||||
| Matrix effect (%) | ||||||||
| Matrix effect | Mean | 1 ng/mL | 14.40 | |||||
| 1,500 ng/mL | 6.97 | |||||||
| SD | 1 ng/mL | 8.09 | ||||||
| 1,500 ng/mL | 7.00 | |||||||
| Stability test results | ||||||||
| Stability | Period (h) | Changes in the concentration of QCs (%) | ||||||
| LQC | IQC | MQC | HQC | |||||
| Working standard, 2°C | 24 | 13.97 | 12.24 | 12.35 | 13.31 | |||
| 48 | 12.08 | 14.38 | 13.55 | 14.44 | ||||
| 120 | 7.60 | 2.85 | 11.64 | 3.20 | ||||
| Autosampler, 4°C | 168 | 5.02 | 8.81 | 14.90 | 12.42 | |||
| 24 | 13.51 | 13.93 | 2.30 | 6.93 | ||||
| 24 | 7.12 | 14.11 | 14.92 | 7.17 | ||||
| Freeze and thaw, –75°C | 48 | 9.58 | 12.84 | 4.52 | 3.91 | |||
| 72 | 12.56 | 13.00 | 12.40 | 14.90 | ||||
| 480 | 7.16 | 2.30 | 2.66 | 10.25 | ||||
| Sample processing, 21°C | 3 | 13.38 | 14.62 | 3.21 | 4.07 | |||
Results of screening tests (concentrations in ng/mL)
| Species | Breed | Fluralaner | Sarolaner | Lotilaner | Afoxolaner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dog | German shepherd | - | 434.6 | - | - |
| German shepherd | - | 12.1 | - | - | |
| German shepherd | - | - | - | - | |
| German shepherd | 414.3 | - | - | - | |
| German shepherd | - | - | - | 1.3 | |
| German Shepherd | - | 19.0 | - | - | |
| German shepherd | 346.5 | - | - | - | |
| Yorkshire terrier | - | - | - | 1.0 | |
| Yorkshire terrier | - | - | - | 1.0 | |
| Yorkshire terrier | - | - | - | 1.0 | |
| Schnauzer | 388.3 | - | - | - | |
| Schnauzer | 76.7 | - | - | - | |
| Schnauzer | - | - | - | - | |
| Golden retriever | - | - | - | - | |
| Golden retriever | - | 225.0 | - | - | |
| Siberian husky | - | - | - | - | |
| Siberian husky | - | 196.0 | - | - | |
| Beagle | - | - | - | - | |
| Beagle | - | 5.6 | - | - | |
| Labrador retriever | - | 100.6 | - | - | |
| Cat | European cat | - | - | - | - |
| European cat | - | 23.8 | - | - | |
| European cat | - | 233.3 | - | - | |
| European cat | - | - | - | - | |
| European cat | - | - | - | - | |
| Persian cat | - | - | - | - | |
| Persian cat | - | - | - | - | |
| Persian cat | - | - | - | - | |
| Persian cat | - | - | - | - | |
| Persian cat | - | - | - | - |
Calculation methods and acceptance criteria for parameters for validation of an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of isoxazoline derivatives in plasma
| Parameter | Acceptance criteria | |
|---|---|---|
| Linearity | Calibration points | Back-calculated concentrations should be within ± 15% of the nominal concentration, and at least 75% of the calibration points, but no fewer than 6, must fulfil this criterion |
| Coefficient of determination (r2) | ≥ 0.99 | |
| Relative residuals (Yi) | ||
| SD of relative residuals (SYi) | ||
| Stability | Stock and working standard | |
| Autosampler | ||
| Freeze and thaw | ||
| Sample processing temperature | ||
| Precision (RSD or CV) | ||
| Accuracy (deviation) (for at least 5 points per group/day) | ||
| LOD | 3 × SDCfortified where S/N ≥ 3: 1 | |
| LLOQ with accuracy and precision | 6 × Cfortified where S/N ≥ 10: 1 | |
| Matrix effect | ||
| Total recovery | ||
| Selectivity/Specificity | No endogenous peaks in the retention time of the analyte | |
| Carry-over | Area of carry-over peaks: ≤ 20% of LLOQ and 5% of IS area | |
Validation results of an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of lotilaner in clinically healthy laying hen plasma
| Linearity | r2 | I | II | III | IV | V | Mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | |||
| Precision (%) and accuracy (%) | Intra-day, n = 6; 3 replications | LLOQ | LQC | IQC | MQC | HQC | ||
| Precision | I | 14.97 | 1.79 | 3.67 | 4.46 | 7.82 | ||
| Accuracy | 11.67 | 1.33 | 2.58 | 6.72 | 5.60 | |||
| Precision | II | 7.40 | 4.10 | 4.95 | 5.02 | 4.61 | ||
| Accuracy | 5.00 | 3.29 | 3.27 | 7.03 | 3.76 | |||
| Inter-day, n = 18 | Precision | III | 6.32 | 2.33 | 5.99 | 8.22 | 1.42 | |
| Accuracy | 3.33 | 1.67 | 4.03 | 9.11 | 1.19 | |||
| Precision | 9.57 | 2.74 | 4.87 | 5.15 | 4.61 | |||
| Accuracy | 6.67 | 2.10 | 3.29 | 4.99 | 3.52 | |||
| Concentration (ng/mL) | S/N | |||||||
| LLOQ and LOD | LLOQ overall mean, n = 18 | 1.00 | 73.23 | |||||
| LLOQ overall SD, n = 18 | 0.09 | 5.95 | ||||||
| LOD overall mean, n = 18 | 0.5 | 5.55 | ||||||
| LOD overall SD, n = 18 | 0.39 | 2.87 | ||||||
| Sample | Total recovery (%) | |||||||
| Total recovery | Mean | 1 ng/mL | 95.50 | |||||
| 1,500 ng/mL | 93.16 | |||||||
| SD | 1 ng/mL | 14.76 | ||||||
| 1,500 ng/mL | 5.07 | |||||||
| Matrix effect (%) | ||||||||
| Matrix effect | Mean | 1 ng/mL | 14.10 | |||||
| 1,500 ng/mL | 7.09 | |||||||
| SD | 1 ng/mL | 5.98 | ||||||
| 1,500 ng/mL | 4.51 | |||||||
| Stability test results | ||||||||
| Stability | Period (h) | Changes in the concentration of QCs (%) | ||||||
| LQC | IQC | MQC | HQC | |||||
| Working standard, 2°C | 24 | 6.32 | 7.40 | 10.90 | 5.91 | |||
| 48 | 8.24 | 13.25 | 6.07 | 8.71 | ||||
| 120 | 9.58 | 13.60 | 2.96 | 11.92 | ||||
| Autosampler, 4°C | 168 | 8.45 | 14.87 | 11.29 | 12.82 | |||
| 24 | 13.50 | 13.99 | 9.54 | 14.94 | ||||
| 24 | 12.30 | 7.27 | 12.88 | 9.35 | ||||
| Freeze and thaw, –75°C | 48 | 8.75 | 5.60 | 11.63 | 12.44 | |||
| 72 | 13.03 | 2.37 | 3.95 | 6.73 | ||||
| 480 | 13.34 | 11.42 | 11.26 | 9.70 | ||||
| Sample processing, 21°C | 3 | 4.21 | 5.42 | 10.18 | 2.61 | |||
Validation results of an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of afoxolaner in clinically healthy laying hen plasma
| Linearity | r2 | I | II | III | IV | V | Mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | |||
| Precision (%) and accuracy (%) | Intra-day, n = 6; 3 repetitions | LLOQ | LQC | IQC | MQC | HQC | ||
| Precision | I | 7.66 | 10.28 | 3.04 | 2.47 | 3.45 | ||
| Accuracy | 5.00 | 8.67 | 2.48 | 3.22 | 2.00 | |||
| Precision | II | 13.22 | 4.20 | 4.30 | 6.66 | 8.16 | ||
| Accuracy | 10.00 | 2.67 | 3.27 | 5.54 | 6.39 | |||
| Inter-day, n = 18 | Precision | III | 9.67 | 3.10 | 2.26 | 5.23 | 4.52 | |
| Accuracy | 5.00 | 2.67 | 1.60 | 8.02 | 3.65 | |||
| Precision | 10.18 | 5.86 | 3.20 | 6.07 | 5.05 | |||
| Accuracy | 6.67 | 4.67 | 2.45 | 6.01 | 4.01 | |||
| Concentration (ng/mL) | S/N | |||||||
| LLOQ and LOD | LLOQ overall mean, n = 18 | 1.00 | 92.30 | |||||
| LLOQ overall SD, n = 18 | 0.04 | 4.8 | ||||||
| LOD overall mean, n = 18 | 0.5 | 0.9 | ||||||
| LOD overall SD, n = 18 | 0.44 | 1.11 | ||||||
| Sample | Total recovery (%) | |||||||
| Total recovery | Mean | 1 ng/mL | 85.19 | |||||
| 1,500 ng/mL | 87.05 | |||||||
| SD | 1 ng/mL | 14.14 | ||||||
| 1,500 ng/mL | 7.88 | |||||||
| Matrix effect (%) | ||||||||
| Matrix effect | Mean | 1 ng/mL | 13.77 | |||||
| 1,500 ng/mL | 14.69 | |||||||
| SD | 1 ng/mL | 9.56 | ||||||
| 1,500 ng/mL | 10.52 | |||||||
| Stability test results | ||||||||
| Stability | Period (h) | Changes in the concentration of QCs (%) | ||||||
| LQC | IQC | MQC | HQC | |||||
| Working standard, 2°C | 24 | 5.74 | 3.07 | 4.96 | 1.16 | |||
| 48 | 14.91 | 14.58 | 12.01 | 14.28 | ||||
| 120 | 9.82 | 7.82 | 11.76 | 14.80 | ||||
| Autosampler, 4°C | 168 | 12.79 | 3.31 | 11.28 | 13.84 | |||
| 24 | 13.15 | 8.10 | 9.55 | 14.14 | ||||
| 24 | 10.00 | 12.99 | 6.47 | 3.44 | ||||
| Freeze and thaw, –75°C | 48 | 14.10 | 13.78 | 14.05 | 12.39 | |||
| 72 | 14.84 | 3.12 | 13.48 | 10.89 | ||||
| 480 | 12.53 | 10.90 | 12.66 | 8.37 | ||||
| Sample processing, 21°C | 3 | 5.66 | 14.37 | 13.26 | 13.68 | |||
Validation results of an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of fluralaner in clinically healthy laying hen plasma
| Linearity | r2 | I 0.99 | II 0.99 | III 0.99 | IV 0.99 | V 0.99 | Mean 0.99 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision (%) and accuracy (%) | Intra-day, n = 6; 3 replications | LLOQ | LQC | IQC | MQC | HQC | ||
| Precision | I | 8.94 | 5.59 | 1.94 | 3.89 | 1.66 | ||
| Accuracy | 6.67 | 4.33 | 1.62 | 2.64 | 1.29 | |||
| Precision | II | 4.15 | 6.81 | 2.34 | 7.81 | 2.47 | ||
| Accuracy | 1.67 | 5.33 | 1.90 | 4.65 | 1,99 | |||
| Inter-day, n = 18 | Precision | III | 7.66 | 9.38 | 5.54 | 3.25 | 6.16 | |
| Accuracy | 5.00 | 7.33 | 4.60 | 6.01 | 4,87 | |||
| Precision | 7.23 | 2.19 | 1.75 | 3.03 | 3.16 | |||
| Accuracy | 5.70 | 1.67 | 4.91 | 2.90 | 2.60 | |||
| Concentration (ng/mL) | S/N | |||||||
| LLOQ and LOD | LLOQ overall mean, n = 18 | 1.00 | 90.00 | |||||
| LLOQ overall SD, n = 18 | 0.14 | 5.91 | ||||||
| LOD overall mean, n = 18 | 0.5 | 6.22 | ||||||
| LOD overall SD, n = 18 | 0.33 | 3.91 | ||||||
| Total recovery | Sample | Total recovery (%) | ||||||
| Mean | 1 ng/mL | 91.19 | ||||||
| 1,500 ng/mL | 85.39 | |||||||
| SD | 1 ng/mL | 12.73 | ||||||
| 1,500 ng/mL | 5.94 | |||||||
| Matrix effect (%) | ||||||||
| Matrix effect | Mean | 1 ng/mL | 10.15 | |||||
| 1,500 ng/mL | 14.81 | |||||||
| SD | 1 ng/mL | 8.22 | ||||||
| 1,500 ng/mL | 2.94 | |||||||
| Stability tests results | ||||||||
| Stability | Period (h) | Changes in the concentration of QCs (%) | ||||||
| LQC | IQC | MQC | HQC | |||||
| 24 | 13.25 | 3.07 | 4.96 | 1.16 | ||||
| Working standard, 2°C | 48 | 8.92 | 14.58 | 12.01 | 14.28 | |||
| 120 | 13.25 | 10.90 | 9.02 | 12.24 | ||||
| 168 | 14.31 | 13.95 | 11.15 | 11.10 | ||||
| Autosampler, 4°C | 24 | 7.01 | 9.80 | 14.48 | 7.72 | |||
| 24 | 14.71 | 13.91 | 5.30 | 2.77 | ||||
| Freeze and thaw, –75°C | 48 | 14.07 | 14.93 | 12.60 | 4.65 | |||
| 72 | 12.33 | 14.39 | 13.98 | 13.49 | ||||
| 480 | 14.49 | 14.77 | 10.30 | 8.52 | ||||
| Sample processing, 21°C | 3 | 14.04 | 9.23 | 4.01 | 3.73 | |||
Selected parameters of ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) for the determination of isoxazoline derivatives in plasma
| MS/MS parameters | Compound | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluralaner | Sarolaner | Lotilaner | Afoxolaner | ||
| Precursor ions (m/z) | 556.06 | 581.03 | 595.98 | 625.73 | |
| Product ions (m/z) | Quantification ions | 457.0 | 457.0 | 439.75 | 469.89 |
| Confirmation ions | 400.0 | 415.9 | 166.03 | 195.97 | |
| Collision energy (eV) | Quantification ions | 18 | 25 | 30 | 26 |
| Confirmation ions | 12 | 20 | 35 | 48 | |
| Retention time (min) | 2.55 | 2.55 | 3.33 | 3.18 | |
| Capillary voltage (kV) | 3.0 | ||||
| Cone voltage (V) | 20 | ||||
| Desolvation gas | Nitrogen | ||||
| Desolvation gas temperature (°C) | 600 | ||||
| Desolvation gas flow (L/h) | 1000 | ||||
| Collision gas flow (mL/min) | 0.2 | ||||
| Collision gas | Argon | ||||
| Source temperature (°C) | 120 | ||||
| Electrospray mode | Positive | ||||
| Dwell (s) | 0.1 | ||||