Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Is Pseudomonas aeruginosa a possible aetiological agent of periodontitis in dogs? Cover

Is Pseudomonas aeruginosa a possible aetiological agent of periodontitis in dogs?

Open Access
|Feb 2025

Full Article

Introduction

Periodontal disease is one of the most common diseases in adult dogs and affects up to 80% of animals. The aetiology of the disease is poorly studied, although bacteria are known to play a major role (25). Based on the clinical signs, periodontal diseases are usually divided into two groups, gingivitis and periodontitis. The most common clinical signs of periodontal disease include halitosis, ptyalism, altered gingival colour, gingival bleeding, tooth mobility, anorexia and behavioural changes (1, 13). The diagnosis of periodontal diseases in dogs typically involves a clinical examination and dental radiography, which can reveal changes in the structure of the periodontal bone. Microbiological tests, including cultures and bacterial identification, can be useful in determining the specific pathogens present in the oral cavity (23), particularly in light of the highly diverse canine oral flora in healthy as well as diseased animals (25).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped, non-spore-forming bacterium with dimensions of 0.5–0.8 μm by 1.5–3.0 μm (5). The living environment of this bacterium may be soil and water; however, it can also be found in humans and animals. It is primarily aerobic but can also grow anaerobically in the presence of NO3. Its mobility is provided by the flagellum at the cell’s pole (28). The optimal temperature for the growth of P. aeruginosa is 37°C, but it can also grow at temperatures up to 42°C (5). The bacterium does not liquefy gelatin and does not produce indole or β-galactosidase. It is oxidase-positive, lactose-non-fermenting and secretes pigments such as pyocyanin, fluorescein, pyorubin or pyomelanin (18). The bacterium can form complex macrocolonies (biofilms) attached to surfaces or exist free as single-celled organisms (planktonic forms) (28).

In 2000, the entire genome of P. aeruginosa was sequenced. It consists of a relatively large circular chromosome (5.5–6.8 Mb) that carries between 5,500 and 6,000 open reading frames, and depending on the strain, sometimes plasmids of various sizes (20).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic bacterium for humans and animals and one of the most important and dangerous microorganisms causing nosocomial infections (8). Infection with P. aeruginosa is a particularly important problem for patients with cystic fibrosis, and its treatment is difficult because of the high resistance of this bacterium to antibiotics (8, 15, 24).

The bacterium is naturally resistant to many antibiotics because of the relative impermeability of the cell wall and membrane. Its natural resistance to chemotherapeutic agents of which the spectrum includes Gram-negative bacteria extends to resistance to cotrimoxazole and many β-lactam antibiotics (28). Hospital strains may be resistant to a larger number of drugs, because plasmids containing resistance genes may be transferred between microorganisms by transduction and conjugation. This involves the production of much larger amounts of cephalosporinases in transfer-recipient strains as a result of gene derepression, the production of carbapenemases and the synthesis of membrane pumps moving drugs out of the cell or mutations of proteins responsible for the transport of antibiotics into cells (4, 19). Some strains produce Pseudomonas-specific enzymes with a narrow substrate spectrum which degrade some beta-lactam antibiotics (22).

The main aim of the study was to attempt a comprehensive identification of the bacterial strains isolated from a dog with periodontitis. The second aim was the direction of further research attention to P. aeruginosa as an aetiological agent of canine periodontitis.

Material and Methods
Clinical examination

The owner of a 9-year-old male Schnauzer dog with recurrent oral problems came to the Department and Clinic of Animal Surgery at the University of Life Sciences in Lublin. Periodontal examination and swab collection for microbiological tests were performed on the dog under general anaesthesia before the oral cavity was sanitised. The dental examination included a visual assessment of the gums, the oral vestibule mucosa and the surface of the tooth crowns. Special attention was paid to the occurrence of swelling and redness of the gums, the appearance of ulcers/erosions on the oral mucosa and the presence of bacterial plaque/tartar deposits covering the tooth surfaces. The consistency and tenderness of the gums were assessed by palpation. The measurement of periodontal pocket depth (PPD) was performed using a Williams periodontal probe and was marked in millimetres. The probe was inserted carefully, parallel to the long axis of the tooth. The examination was performed at four measurement points. Pocket depth of 1–3 mm was assessed as gingivitis, depth of 3.1–5 mm as early periodontitis, 5.1–7 mm indicated moderate periodontitis and PPD > 7 mm was a severe periodontitis diagnosis. After a clinical examination, periodontitis was diagnosed. Then, after general anaesthesia, scaling was performed and the tooth crowns were protected with Biochem enamel rebuilding preparation (Chema-Elektromet, Rzeszów, Poland).

Microbiological examination

A sample was collected using a sterile swab from the periodontal pocket (after rinsing with physiological saline solution). The swab was placed in a collection tube with sterile Amies transport medium (Medlab-Products, Raszyn, Poland) and immediately sent for microbiological analysis. General treatment was implemented based on an antibiotic resistance test and microbiological analysis.

The swab sample was plated as soon as possible on sheep blood agar (Columbia LAB-AGAR + 5% sheep blood; BioMaxima, Lublin, Poland) and was incubated at 37°C for 18–24 h. Microorganisms were initially identified by colony morphology, haemolytic pattern and Gram staining (Color Gram 2 kit; bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France).

Susceptibility test

The antibiotic susceptibility was tested on Mueller–Hinton agar (BioMaxima) using the standard disc diffusion technique (Kirby–Bauer test) as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (6). Bacteria were grown on Mueller–Hilton agar at 37°C for 18–24 h. After incubation, a few colonies were reconstituted with sterile physiological saline to a dilution approximating to 0.5 McFarland standards. The bacterial suspension was spread onto a Mueller–Hinton agar plate surface to form a confluent lawn and incubated for approximately 15 min, and afterwards, the agar plates were impregnated with the following antibiotic discs: the aminoglycoside gentamicin at 10 μg; the antipseudomonal cephalosporins ceftazidime and cefepime, both at 30 μg; the antipseudomonal carbapenem imipenem at 30 μg, the antipseudomonal fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin at 5 μg and the antipseudomonal penicillin piperacillin at 100 μg combined with the β-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam at 10 μg. The antibiotics tested against P. aeruginosa were selected according to the recommendations of Magiorakos et al. (21). Plates were read after 24 h incubation, and the results were recorded.

Identification of microorganisms using VITEK 2

The biochemical identification of microorganisms was performed with VITEK 2 (bioMérieux). A bacterial suspension was prepared from the isolated colonies grown in the medium in 3 mL of sterile saline in a clear polystyrene test tube. The turbidity of the suspension was adjusted to a McFarland standard of 0.5 with the help of a VITEK 2 DensiCheck instrument. The time between the preparation of inoculum and filling of the VITEK 2 card was always less than 30 min. Identification with the VITEK 2 compact system was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using the Gram-negative (GN) card.

Identification of microorganisms using MALDI Biotyper

A Microflex LT/SH MALDI Biotyper system (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) and IVD library v.12 containing 4,194 species from 2022 (Bruker) was used. The spectra were compared with the library entries with IVD Compass 4.2.100 software (Bruker). The standard identification protocol provided by the manufacturer of the spectrometer was followed, and α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid was adopted as a matrix.

DNA analysis

Bacterial isolates were passed several times into the Petri dishes with Mueller–Hinton blood agar to multiply the culture. The Petri plates were cultured for 24 h with agar for DNA isolation, which was carried out from individual bacterial colonies using a Tissue & Bacterial DNA Purification Kit (EurX, Gdańsk, Poland) according to the product protocol. The concentration and quality of the isolated DNA were evaluated using a NanoDrop One spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). The obtained DNA samples were diluted with nuclease-free water (EurX) to 20 ng/μL for further analyses.

For molecular identification of bacteria, a multilocus sequence analysis strategy was pursued. Four primer pairs were designed, one amplifying a fragment of the 16S rRNA sequence, and three doing so for three housekeeping genes: gyrB, encoding gyrase subunit B, which is a subunit of an important bacterial enzyme that catalyses the adenosine triphosphate–dependent negative supercoiling of circular double-stranded DNA; rpoB, encoding the β-subunit of RNA polymerase; and rpoD, encoding sigma factor binding RNA polymerase. The sequences of the primers used in genetic identification are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Primers sequences used in the study

GeneForward primerReverse primerExpected product length (bp)
16srRNAAGGGAGCTTGCCTTGGATTCGGATGCAGTTCCCAGGTTGA557
gyrBCCGGAGACCTTCAGCAACATTTGCCCATCTCCTGTTCCAC548
rpoDAAAGAGTTGATCGCCCGAGGTGCTGTCGTCGCTTTCTTCT583
rpoBTTGTTTCTGTTGCTGCGTCGGATTTCCTCTGGGCCAAGCT572

All PCRs were performed in 25 μL volumes containing 20 ng of genomic DNA, 2× PCR Mix Plus Red (A&A Biotechnology, Gdańsk, Poland) and 0.2 μM of each primer. Amplification was carried out in a Biometra TOne thermal cycler (Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany). The cycling conditions of the PCR were as follows: one cycle of 5 min at 95°C; 30 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 30 s at 60°C and 30 s at 72°C; and a final extension of 5 min at 72 C. The length and quality of PCR products were verified during electrophoresis with 1% agarose gel. After positive verification, the DNA products were sequenced by Genomed (Warsaw, Poland). The generated sequences were used to perform Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (2) analysis to determine the nearest phylogenetic neighbours against the National Center for Biotechnology Information GenBank database of validly published prokaryotic names.

Fig. 1.

Electrophoretic separation of the PCR products of amplification of one small subunit and three housekeeping genes of bacteria isolated from a dog with periodontitis

1 – 16 srRNA gene product; 2 – gyr B1 gene product; 3 – rpo D1 gene product; 4 – rpo B1 gene product; M – 100 bp weight marker; NC – negative control

Results

The bacteria isolated from blood sheep agar were dominated by Gram-negative bacilli with features typical of P. aeruginosa (haemolysis, a specific odour and greenish colour), these comprising nearly 99% of all the isolates. However, the colour of the colonies on the Mueller–Hinton agar plates was metallic yellow, which is rarely observed in P. aeruginosa cultures. As a result, Gram-negative bacilli were identified based on cultural and morphological characteristics and their growth on MacConkey agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK), on indole production and by oxidase test (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France). Only P. aeruginosa grew on MacConkey agar.

The isolate was tested against five classes of antimicrobial agents. In the aminoglycoside class, the strain was sensitive to gentamicin. Resistance was observed to the antipseudomonal cephalosporins (ceftazidime and cefepime), the antipseudomonal carbapenem (imipenem) and the antipseudomonal penicillin combined with β-lactamase inhibitor (piperacillin-tazobactam).

Based on the definition published in Magiorakos et al. (21) of multi-drug resistance (MDR) as acquired nonsusceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories, this strain was classified as MDR. The obtained results prompted the start of treatment with gentamicin at a dose of 4 mg/kg body weight for 10 d, and some improvement was observed after 4 d.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa was indicated as a result of biochemical identification as well as identification using the MALDI Biotyper. In the VITEK2 system, the probability was 96%, which corresponds to excellent identification. The MALDI Biotyper scored its identification at 2.28, where score values higher than 1.99 indicated secure to highly probable species identification, values between 1.7 and 1.99 showed probable genus identification and those between 0.0 and 1.69 designated unreliable identification.

The results from BLAST showed that all the gene fragments used in the comparison analysis had the highest similarity to the P. aeruginosa sequences deposited in the GenBank database. The query sequence coverage in our analysis ranged between 97 and 100%, and the percentage of identical base pairs ranged from 91% for the rpoB gene fragment to 99.81% for the rpoD sequence (Table 2). The results of molecular identification confirm that the analysed bacterial isolate was P. aeruginosa.

Table 2.

Results of BLAST used in bacterial isolate molecular identification

SequenceQuery coveragePercent identityLengthTaxonAccession No.
rpoB99%91%6,375,262Pseudomonas aeruginosaCP046602.1
rpoD97%99.81%6,375,262Pseudomonas aeruginosaCP046602.1
gyrB99%99.6%6,375,262Pseudomonas aeruginosaCP046602.1
16srRNA100%99.42%1,490Pseudomonas aeruginosaPP112146.1
Discussion

Periodontal diseases, including periodontitis, are a significant health issue in dogs that occur in approximately 80% of dogs older than 2 years (10, 29). These diseases not only contribute to discomfort and pain but can also lead to more severe systemic conditions. Additionally, untreated periodontal disease can lead to kidney, liver, lung and heart disease; osteoporosis and diabetes (2). The incidence of the disease increases significantly with the age and weight of the animals. Epidemiological studies indicate a higher occurrence in small breeds (25).

One of the primary aetiological factors for periodontal disease in dogs is bacteria. Pathogenic effects of bacteria result from complex interactions between the microorganisms that inhabit the oral cavity and the host’s immune response. The bacterial flora in the oral cavity of dogs is diverse, containing both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative bacterium known to cause opportunistic infections in humans and animals. It is a highly antibiotic-resistant pathogen that makes the treatment of the infections it causes difficult. In dogs, P. aeruginosa can colonise the oral cavity, especially in conditions of weakened immunity or preexisting periodontal diseases, which create a suitable environment for its growth (12). In the presented work we confirmed the presence of P. aeruginosa in a dog with periodontitis using different methods: biochemical identification (by VITEK 2), mass spectrometry (with a MALDI Biotyper) and comparison of gene sequences. This confirmation may indicate that P. aeruginosa should be considered an aetiological factor of periodontal diseases in dogs.

The pathogenic mechanisms of P. aeruginosa in the context of periodontal diseases include the production of tissue-degrading enzymes such as proteases and toxins that can damage host cells (11). Additionally, this bacterium is capable of forming biofilms – complex bacterial structures surrounded by a protective matrix. These biofilms are more difficult to remove through mechanical cleaning and antibiotics (7).

The presence of P. aeruginosa in the canine oral microflora is rather unusual (3, 25). It is definitely less common than other bacteria such as Porphyromonas gulae or Porphyromonas gingivalis (16, 26). However, there are reports showing the occurrence and even dominance of Pseudomonas sp. after displacement of Psychrobacter as a result of treatment (9). In the study of Riggio et al. (25), the bacteria associated with canine periodontal disease and with normal canine oral cavity were identified using 16S rRNA sequencing as well as with a culture-dependent method. Among the results with the culture-dependent method was the finding that 30.9% of the analysed clones were Pseudomonas sp. in healthy dogs, but a total 13.9% of isolates were Pseudomonas sp. and P. brenneri in dogs with periodontitis (25). The results of the studies by Souto et al. (27) provided evidence that the oral cavity is a reservoir of P. aeruginosa, as well as proof of the association of this microorganism with the presence of periodontal infection in humans. On the other hand, Pseudomonas was not identified in a different study concerning canine composite oral microbiota (30). Both our and the other cited results may indicate a yet undiscovered role of Pseudomonas in the oral microflora of dogs. The growth of this bacterium in periodontal tissues may reflect its ability to grow rapidly in a competition-depleted environment, which may be reflected in an increase in the abundance of Pseudomonas in the intestinal microbiota during disease or after the administration of antimicrobials. Furthermore, the high relative abundance of Pseudomonas is unlikely to be due to contamination during periodontitis prevention, because it is difficult to introduce exogenous bacteria and have them proliferate (14, 17).

Treatment and prevention of periodontal diseases in dogs require regular oral hygiene care, including tooth brushing and professional dental cleaning by a veterinarian, and also require an appropriate diet. In cases of bacterial infections, including those caused by P. aeruginosa, antibiotics may be necessary, although their use must be strictly controlled because of the increasing resistance of this bacteria (12, 16). For example, one of our results showed the resistance of P. aeruginosa to carbapenemase. This finding might be of great importance, because carbapenemase-resistant P. aeruginosa strains are amongst the critical pathogens listed on the World Health Organization list of those of high priority (8). In the case presented in this study, 10 days of gentamicin treatment brought significant improvement. On the other hand, in the work of Werckenthin et al. (31) P. aeruginosa isolates from infections of the skin, ear and mouth as well as the urinary and genital tract of dogs and cats were resistant to most antimicrobial agents or susceptible to them only at high minimum inhibitory concentrations of the drugs (31). However, only 27% of isolates were observed to be resistant to gentamicin.

Conclusion

Periodontal diseases in dogs are a significant health problem, with bacteria playing a crucial role in their aetiology. Understanding the pathogenic mechanisms of these microorganisms and effective methods of diagnosis and treatment are essential for preventing and controlling these diseases (9). In our opinion, attention should be paid to Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a possible aetiological factor of periodontal diseases in dogs.

Language: English
Page range: 35 - 40
Submitted on: Jul 3, 2024
Accepted on: Feb 7, 2025
Published on: Feb 25, 2025
Published by: National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:

© 2025 Małgorzata Targońska-Karasek, Izabela Polkowska, Henryk Krukowski, published by National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.