Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Morphological and molecular characterisation of the nematode parasite Graphidioides affinis (Secernentea: Trichostrongylidae) in Patagonian maras, Dolichotis patagonum, kept in a zoo in Sofia, Bulgaria Cover

Morphological and molecular characterisation of the nematode parasite Graphidioides affinis (Secernentea: Trichostrongylidae) in Patagonian maras, Dolichotis patagonum, kept in a zoo in Sofia, Bulgaria

Open Access
|Aug 2024

Full Article

Introduction

Patagonian maras, Dolichotis patagonum (Zimmermann, 1780) are relatively large rodents of the Caviidae family. They are endemic to South America, mainly Argentina, and distributed from 28°S to 50°S (3). They are kept as exotic mammals in zoological parks and gardens around the world, which helps in their conservation. This is desirable because Patagonian maras are considered to be a near-threatened species (17). There are diverse health hazards for these animals (19), and parasitoses are among the most common of them.

Various genera and species of parasites have been found in free or captive Patagonian maras to date. Among them are such nematodes as Graphidioides affinis (Megnin, 1895), Trichostrongylus retortaeformis (Zeder, 1800), Strongyloides sp., Wellcomia dolichotis and Trichuris spp. (2, 8, 14, 22, 23); the protozoa Toxoplasma gondii, Besnoitia sp. and Giardia spp. (7, 16, 23); and the arachnids Otodectes cynotis and Sarcoptes scabiei (4, 12). The aim of this study was to perform morphometric, molecular and phylogenetic characterisation of G. affinis, specimens of which were recently found in Patagonian maras kept at the Sofia Zoo in Bulgaria.

Material and Methods
Sample origin and area of the study

Parasitological monitoring of 18 Patagonian maras kept at the Sofia Zoo was performed with the use of coprological methods in March 2023. The animals shared an enclosure with one kangaroo for more than 10 years. The enclosure consisted of an outdoor part (the larger area, covered by soil and vegetation) and an indoor part (covered by concrete).

Coprological study

Pooled faecal samples (1–2 g from each faecal pile) collected from the ground of the enclosure were processed using diagnostic techniques (9). Those were a common flotation technique with the use of sodium chloride as a flotation solution; a sedimentation technique to detect heavy eggs of flukes, including Fasciola hepatica; and the Baermann technique to detect lungworm larvae. After the samples were analysed, the animals were dewormed once orally with a 10% suspension of albendazole (Vermitan; Ceva Santé Animale, Libourne, France) at a dose of 8 mg/kg body weight. The medicine was mixed with a small amount of food after a 16-h fast. Dead adult nematode parasites were detected in the faeces of dewormed individuals. The specimens were collected in saline, washed in it for 30–60 min and then stored in 70% ethanol for further morphological and molecular analyses.

Morphological and morphometric study

Seven males and seven females of the species were cleared in lactophenol. Each of the cleared worms was placed in a drop of lactophenol between a microscope slide and coverslip and subjected to morphometric processing. The morphological structures of the helminths were measured after taking their microphotographs with a Motic Images Plus 3.0 camera (Motic, Xiamen, China) connected to an Amplival microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany), and subsequently analysed with the use of the camera’s associated software. The morphometric data were processed using Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). The species determination was based on the morphometry of such features as the spicules, the rays of copulatory bursa, the ovijector and the vulva, as recommended previously (20). Some specimens, stored in 70% ethanol or embedded in glycerin-gelatin as permanent microscopic preparations, were deposited in the Institute of Experimental Morphology, Pathology and Anthropology with Museum comprising part of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences in Sofia, Bulgaria.

DNA extraction and PCR amplification

Genomic DNA was extracted individually from four ethanol-preserved nematode specimens with the use of a NucleoSpin Tissue DNA extraction kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The complete sequence of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) and a partial region of the large subunit ribosomal DNA (LSU) were amplified by PCR using the following set of primers: forward-ITS2F (5′-ACG TCT GGT TCA GGG TTG TT-3′) and reverse-BD3R (5′-TAT GCT TAA GTT CAG CGG GT-3′) (15). Additionally, a set of primers was designed for the purpose of this study to amplify a partial region of the small subunit ribosomal rDNA (SSU): forward-SSU_07 (5′-AAA GAT TAA GCC ATG CAT G-3′) and reverse-N1070R (5′-TTG CAA CCA TAC TAC CCC AGG AAC CGA A-3′). The PCR was performed in a T100 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) in a volume of 50 μL. Each 50 μL PCR reaction mix contained 20 μL of Molecular Biology Reagent Water (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 25 μL of AccuStart II PCR ToughMix (×2 concentration) (Quantabio, Beverly, MA, USA), 1 μL of GelTrack Loading Dye (×50 concentration) (Quantabio), 1 μL of forward primer (20 mM), 1 μL of reverse primer (20 mM) and 2 μL of template DNA. The conditions for PCR were as follows: 94°C for 2 min to denature the DNA; 35 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 62°C for 45 s (for ITS2) or 55°C for 90 s (for SSU), and 72°C for 30 s (for ITS2) or for 2 min (for SSU); and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min (for ITS2) or 10 min (for SSU) to ensure complete amplification. The PCR products were purified with the use of the NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up kit (Macherey-Nagel), eluted with 30 μL of Molecular Biology Reagent Water (Sigma-Aldrich) and sequenced in both directions by Genomed S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) using the primers used for amplification (5 mM). The sequences were then assembled into contigs using CodonCode Aligner version 8.0 (CodonCode Corporation, Centerville, MA, USA). Obtained nucleotide sequences were compared to the NCBI database of sequences using the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) (1).

Phylogenetic analyses

Phylogenetic analysis was performed based on partial nucleotide sequences of the SSU and ITS2 genes using the newly generated sequences and matching sequences available in GenBank (Tables 1 and 2). Forward and reverse sequences were assembled using CodonCode Aligner version 8.0 software. Contiguous sequences were submitted to GenBank, those of the SSU gaining accession nos OR611714.1 and OR611716.1 and the ITS2 sequence being logged as OR353426.1. Both sets of sequences were aligned using AlignX implemented in Vector NTI Advance 11 (Invitrogen/ Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The alignment was trimmed to the length of the shortest sequence. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using Bayesian inference as implemented in MrBayes version 3.2.0 software (18). The general time-reversible model with estimates of invariant sites and gamma-distributed among-site variation for SSU and gamma distributed among-site variation for ITS2 was chosen as the best-fitting nucleotide substitution model for the dataset. Model selection was made with JModelTest version 2.1.4 software (5, 11). In the SSU analysis the sequence of Caenorhabditis elegans (GenBank accession no. AY268117.1) was used as the outgroup. The Bayesian inference analysis was performed as follows: a Monte Carlo Markov chain was run for 2,000,000 generations, log-likelihood scores were plotted and the final 75% of trees were used to produce the consensus tree.

Table 1.

List of taxa included in the molecular analysis of Graphidioides affinis using sequence data of the SSU rDNA

GenBank accession no.SpeciesHostLocation
AY268117.1Caenorhabditis elegansNot applicableUSA
AJ920341.1Chabertia ovinaOvis ariesCanada
AJ920350.1Trichostrongylus colubriformisOvis ariesCanada
AJ920359.1Tetrabothriostrongylus mackerrasaeAntechinus stuartiiCanada
EU086374.1Haemonchus contortusGiraffa camelopardalisUSA/Lion Country Safari/region of origin: Africa
L04152.1H. similisNot providedUSA
OP288108.1Globocephalus urosubulatusSus scrofaBrazil
AY295811.1Necator americanusHomo sapiensGuatemala
DQ094176.1Strongylus equinusNot providedGreat Britan
AJ920342.1Cylicocyclus insignisEquus caballusCanada
LC415112.1Oesophagostomum muntiacumMuntiacus reevesiJapan
AJ920340.1Cyclodontostomum purvisiRattus sordidusCanada
OP288110.1Stephanurus dentatusSus scrofaBrazil
MN218457.1Uncinaria stenocephalaCanis latransCanada
AJ920351.1Ostertagia leptospicularisBos taurusCanada
AJ920352.1Ostertagia ostertagiBos taurusCanada
AY295820.1Troglostrongylus wilsoniLynx rufusUSA
KC771250.1Dictyocaulus viviparus bisontisBison bonasusPoland
KM374671.1Dictyocaulus cerviCervus elaphusPoland
MH756629.1Dictyocaulus skrjabiniCervus elaphusPoland
MH688454.1Lamanema chaveziLama lamaGermany/region of origin: South America
JX877671.1Travassostrongylus orloffiDidelphis marsupialisMexico
JX877677.1Travassostrongylus callisDidelphis marsupialisPanama
AJ920355.1Heligmosomoides polygyrusMus musculusCanada
JX877678.1Carolinensis perezponcedeleoniNyctomys sumichrastiUSA
JX877672.1Vexillata convolutaCratogeomys merriamiMexico
AJ920360.1Nematodirus battusOvis ariesCanada
OR611714.1Graphidioides affinisDolichotis patagonumBulgaria/Sofia Zoo/region of origin: South America
OR611716.1Graphidioides affinisDolichotis patagonumBulgaria/Sofia Zoo/region of origin: south America

Bold indicates isolates examined in the present investigation

Table 2.

List of taxa included in the molecular analysis of Graphidioides affinis using sequence data of ITS2 rDNA

GenBank accession no.SpeciesHostLocation
KF765464.1Heligmosomoides polygyrusApodemus sylvaticusNorway
MH688454.1Lamanema chaveziLama lamaGermany/region of origin: South America
Y10789.1Chabertia ovinaOvis ariesAustralia
LC415112.1Oesophagostomum muntiacumMuntiacus reevesiJapan
OQ773550.1Uncinaria stenocephalaUrsus arctosTurkey
OR353426.1Graphidioides affinisDolichotis patagonumBulgaria/Sofia Zoo/region of origin: South America
AF194138.1Nematodirus battusNot providedUK
KX358861.1Cooperia oncophoraBison bonasus caucasicusSweden/Avesta Visentpark
KX358862.1Ostertagia ostertagiBison bonasus caucasicusSweden/Avesta Visentpark
X86025.1O. leptospicularisBos taurus
KX358860.1Haemonchus contortusBison bonasus caucasicusSweden/Avesta Visentpark
AJ577460.1Spiculopteragia boehmiNot providedFrance

Bold indicates isolates examined in the present investigation

Results
Coprological findings

Examination of the fresh faeces of D. patagonum by the direct flotation technique revealed large nematode eggs. They were oval, symmetrical and double-shelled, containing numerous small, hard-to-distinguish blastomeres which were 127–140 μm long and 68–75 μm wide (Fig. 1). Neither eggs nor larvae were found with the sedimentation or Baermann techniques.

Fig. 1.

An egg of Graphidioides affinis found in the faeces of Dolichotis patagonum from the Sofia Zoo, Bulgaria

Additionally, 20 small, thin, red nematodes, which were dead, were found in the faeces of the animals on the second and third day after deworming.

Morphometric characterisation

Spindle-shaped nematodes were observed, with a cylindrical anterior end and barely perceptible papillae around the oral opening (Fig. 2a). The nematodes’ bodies were covered with transverse and longitudinal cuticular striations (Fig. 2b). The oesophagi were seen to be cylindrical, with a bulbous dilated distal part (Fig. 2c). Male specimens. Male G. affinis nematodes had bodies 1–2 cm long, 130–155 μm wide at the end of the oesophagus, and maximally 250–340 μm wide. The length of their oesophagi was 505–558 μm, and the maximum width of them was 82–95 μm. The copulatory bursae were well developed and cup-shaped, with one dorsal lobe and two symmetrical left and right lobes (Fig. 3a). A pair of weakly pronounced pre-bursal papillae was present (Fig. 3b). The anteroventral rays of the bursae were short, thin and directed forward, and the posteroventral rays were long, massive and directed backwards (Fig. 3b). The lateral rays were equally wide, the medio- and posterolateral rays extended to the bursal edge, but the anterolateral rays terminated a short distance before it. The exterodorsal rays did not reach the edge of the bursae (Fig. 3c). The dorsal rays were distally cleft, with each of the two branches slightly apically cleft (Fig. 3d). The spicules were equal in size, 1,930–2,700 μm long and filiform, with a tubular structure, pointed distal ends and minimal wings extending distally, through which they touched each other (Fig. 4). The gubernacula were 159–172 μm long and broad based, with raised lateral parts directed anteriorly which gave them a shape like an anchor (Fig. 3c). Female specimens. Female G. affinis nematodes had bodies 1.4–2.4 cm long, 185–244 μm wide at the end of the oesophagus, and maximally 260–440 μm wide. The length of their oesophagi was 609–714 μm, and the maximum width of them was 97–124 μm. The ovijectors’ total length was 1,110–1,448 μm, and their anterior part was several times longer than the posterior part (Fig. 5a). The vulvae were transverse slits located 4.8–6.0 mm from the tail tip (Fig. 5b and c). The tips of the tails were rounded, and at a point 321–442 from them were the anuses, after which the bodies sharply narrowed (Fig. 5d). Eggs in the uteri were 107–171 μm long and 60–94 μm wide. In all cases and for male and female specimens alike, the morphometry of the worms corresponded to G. affinis.

Fig. 2.

Graphidioides affinis adult worm found in the faeces of Dolichotis patagonum from the Sofia Zoo, Bulgaria; a – anterior end, papillae around the oral opening (arrows); b – cuticular striations on the body; c – oesophagus

Fig. 3.

Posterior body end of male Graphidioides affinis found in the faeces of Dolichotis patagonum from the Sofia Zoo, Bulgaria; a – common view; b – 1- pre-bursal papillae, 2 - anteroventral ray of copulatory bursa, 3 - posteroventral ray of copulatory bursa; c – copulatory bursa, 1 – anterolateral ray, 2 – mediolateral ray, 3 – posterolateral ray, 4 – exterodorsal ray; d – dorsal ray of copulatory bursa (arrow)

Fig. 4.

Spicules of Graphidioides affinis found in the faeces of Dolichotis patagonum from the Sofia Zoo, Bulgaria; a – proximal parts; b – distal parts

Fig. 5.

Female Graphidioides affinis found in the faeces of Dolichotis patagonum from the Sofia Zoo, Bulgaria; a – ovijector; b and c – vulva; d – posterior end; anus (arrow)

DNA sequences

Products of the PCR which were partial SSU, ITS2 and LSU sequences were obtained from all four ethanol-preserved worm specimens. In all cases the presence of the DNA of G. affinis was detected. The nucleotide sequence of the partial SSU was 871 bp in length for the first isolate of the species (GenBank accession no. OR611714.1), whereas three other isolates were 100% homologous sequences of 945 bp in length (GenBank accession no. OR611716.1). Four obtained partial nucleotide sequences of the ITS2 and the partial LSU of 269 bp in length were 100% homologous and were submitted to the NCBI as a single sequence (GenBank accession no. OR353426.1).

Phylogenetic analysis

Bayesian analysis of the SSU sequence data with Caenorhabditis elegans (GenBank accession no. AY268117.1) as an outgroup revealed nine strongly supported clades (Fig. 6). Four individual clades of Trichostrongylus colubriformis, Tetrabothriostrongylus mackerrasae, Nematodirus battus and C. elegans were created.

Fig. 6.

Phylogenetic tree of parasitic nematodes based on SSU rDNA partial sequences, constructed with the use of Bayesian inference analysis using MrBayes version 3.2.0. The general time-reversible model with estimates of invariant sites and gamma-distributed among-site variation model was chosen based on jModelTest version 2.1.4 using the Akaike information criterion. The analysis was run for 2,000,000 generations

The taxons of G. affinis (GenBank accession nos: OR611714.1 and OR611716.1) obtained in this study were placed in separate clades, as were Haemonchus similis and H. contortus. Another cluster comprised six subclades: one including taxa of Chabertia ovina, Cyclodontostomum purvisi and Oesophagostomum muntiacum with Stephanurus dentatus as a sister taxon; another with Cylicocyclus insignis and Strongylus equinus with Necator americanus as a sister taxon; and one with Globocephalus urosubulatus and Uncinaria stenocephala as the sister taxa of those mentioned above. Another cluster comprised four subclades: one including Carolinensis perezponcedeleoni and Vexillata convolute with Heligmosomoides polygyrus as their sister taxon; and another including Travassostrongylus orloffi and T. callis with Lamanema chavezi placed as a sister taxon to the whole group. The last cluster comprised Ostertagia ostertagi and O. leptospicularis with a subclade including Troglostrongylus wilsoni and Dictyocaulus skrjabini, D. cervi and D. viviparus subs. bisontis as sister taxa.

Bayesian inference analysis of the ITS2 sequence data revealed seven strongly supported clades (Fig. 7). The taxon of G. affinis (GenBank accession no. OR353426.1) obtained in this study created an individual clade, as were formed by Spiculopteragia boehmi, H. polygyrus, L. chavezi and N. battus. Other clades comprised H. contortus with Cooperia oncophora and O. ostertagi with O. leptospicularis as sister taxa. Another clade comprised U. stenocephala and a subclade including Ch. ovina and Oe. muntiacum.

Fig. 7.

Phylogenetic tree of parasitic nematodes based on ITS2 partial sequences, constructed with the use of Bayesian inference analysis using MrBayes version 3.2.0. The gamma-distributed among-site variation model was chosen based on jModelTest version 2.1.4 using the Akaike information criterion. The analysis was run for 2,000,000 generations. Bold indicates isolates examined in the present investigation

Discussion

According to the obtained morphometric data, the nematodes detected in the faeces of Patagonian maras were identified as G. affinis. The species was originally described in Patagonian maras from South America (2). To the best of our knowledge, since then, there have only been two studies providing data on the morphometry of G. affinis (6, 8). The morphometric data presented in this study are consistent with those of the previous ones (Table 3).

Table 3.

Comparative morphometry of Graphidioides affinis nematodes in materials from Patagonian maras (Dolichotis patagonum) investigated in different studies

Origin / References
ParameterSofia Zoo, Bulgaria (Present data)Argentina (1)London Zoo, UK (7)Barcelona Zoo Spain (5)
RangeMean ± SD
Adult male nematodes (n = 7)Body length (cm)1–21.5 ± 0.350.9–1.71.11.1–1.3
Body width at the end of the oesophagus (μm)130–155144 ± 8.97---
Maximum body width (μm)250–340291.67 ± 32.5300350350
Oesophagus length (μm)505–558537.6 ± 21.18-650-
Maximum oesophagus width (μm)82–9589 ± 5.79---
Spicule length (μm)1,930–2,7002365 ± 266.082,8003,4002,400–2,700
Gubernaculum length (μm)159–172167.29 ± 4.6115012060
Gubernaculum width (μm)48–5752.29 ± 3.86807568
Adult female nematodes (n = 7)Body length (cm)1.4–2.41.7 ± 0.331.6–2.12.12–2.5
Body width at the end of the oesophagus (μm)185–244207 ± 19.86---
Maximum body width (μm)260–440360 ± 72.34500700750
Oesophagus length609–714642 ± 37.22-650-
Maximum oesophagus width (μm)97–124114 ± 10.46---
Ovijector total length (μm)1110–14481,230 ± 117.411,2001,525-
Vulva-tail tip distance (mm)4.8–6.05 ± 0.4865.5-
Anus-tail tip distance (μm)321–442355 ± 40.54500--
Length of eggs in the uterus (μm)107–171133 ± 26.02140135-
Width of eggs in the uterus (μm)60–9475 ± 11.257575-

SD – standard deviation

Dolichotis patagonum, the host of G. affinis, is a rodent of the Caviomorpha parvorder and Caviidae family. According to a previous study, six out of eight species of Graphidioides are parasites of Caviomorpha families, i.e. the Caviidae, Chinchillidae, Octodontidae and Myocastoridae (13), and the distribution of these trichostrongyloid nematodes is closely related to the distribution of their host families (21). Therefore, it is not surprising that G. affinis was found in D. patagonum, although the particular animals investigated did not originate from their natural habitat in South America, and lived in captivity in a zoo in Europe. In fact, this finding is not exceptional, as Graphidioides affinis was previously recorded in captive Patagonian maras in London Zoo (8) and Barcelona Zoo (6), as well as in a free-ranging population in the Whipsnade Wild Animal Park in the UK (14). Besides infecting D. patagonum, the nematode was also found in Lagostomus maximus (Desmarest, 1817), a host in the Chinchillidae family (10). These data lead us to hypothesise that a parasite–host specificity has arisen between G. affinis and D. patagonum over the course of their long co-evolution and that G. affinis is a highly host-specific parasite. In support of this theory is the failure to find any G. affinis infestation in the kangaroo that lived for years with this group of Patagonian maras.

Conclusion

The study acquired the first nucleotide sequences of G. affinis which were included in the performed phylogenetic analyses. In both analyses the species emphasised its distinctiveness in comparison to other gastrointestinal nematodes, as it was grouped separately.

Language: English
Page range: 363 - 371
Submitted on: Jan 8, 2024
Accepted on: Aug 1, 2024
Published on: Aug 9, 2024
Published by: National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Mariana Panayotova-Pencheva, Zdzisław Laskowski, Anna Maria Pyziel, published by National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.