Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Seroprevalence of antibodies against Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi in horses (Equus caballus) from northern Algeria Cover

Seroprevalence of antibodies against Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi in horses (Equus caballus) from northern Algeria

Open Access
|Jul 2020

Figures & Tables

Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi and Anaplasma phagocytophilum regarding breed, sex, age, and health status

A. phagocytophilum B. burgdorferi

VariableIFAT + (%; 95% CI)ELISA + (%; 95% CI)IFAT + (%; 95% CI)ELISA + (%; 95% CI)
  Age (years)
    1–11 (n = 54)22 (40.7; 28.7–54.0)26 (48.1; 35.4–61.2)22 (40.7; 28.7–54.0)10 (18.5; 10.4–30.9)
    12–16 (n = 33)3 (9.1; 3.1–23.6)4 (12.1; 4.8–27.3)3 (9.1; 3.1–23.6)6 (18.2; 8.6–34.4)
    17–25 (n = 21)0 (0)3 (14.3; 5.0–34.6)3 (14.3; 5.0–34.6)3 (14.3; 5.0–34.6)

P value<0.01 SS<0.01 SS<0.01 SS0.9 NS

  Gender
    Male (n = 62)12 (19.4; 11.4–30.8)9 (14.5; 7.8–25.4)15 (24.2; 15.2–36.2)14 (22.6; 13.9–34.4)
    Female (n = 46)13 (28.3; 17.3–42.6)24 (52.2; 38.1–65.9)13 (28.3; 17.3–42.6)5 (10.9; 4.7–23.0)

P value0.3 NS<0.01 SS0.6 NS0.1 NS

  Breed
    Arabian (n = 85)20 (23.5; 15.8–33.6)22 (25.9; 17.8–36.1)20 (23.5; 15.8–33.6)14 (16.5; 10.1–25.8)
    Barb (n = 13)1(7.7; 1.4–33.3)5 (38.5; 17.7–64.5)1 (7.7; 1.4–33.3)1 (7.7; 1.4–33.3)
    Arab–Barb (n = 10) P value4 (40; 16.8–68.7) 0.2 NS6 (60; 31.2–83.2) 0.07 NS7 (70; 39.7–89.2) <0.01 SS4 (40; 16.8–68.7) 0.1 NS

P value0.2 NS0.07 NS<0.01 SS0.1 NS

  Clinical signs
    Yes (n = 20)9 (45; 25.8–65.8)10 (50; 29.9–70.1)11 (55; 34.2–74.2)7 (35; 18.1–56.7)
    No (n = 108)16 (14.8; 9.3–22.7)23 (21.3; 14.6–29.9)17 (15.7; 10.1–23.8)12 (11.1; 6.5–18.4)

P value<0.01 SS<0.05 S<0.01 SS<0.05 S

Seroprevalence of A_ phagocytophilum around the world

CountryYearTechniquenPositivePrevalence (%)Lower limitUpper limitReference
Algeria2018IFAT1282519.5312.6626.40this study
Bulgaria2018ELISA1553120.0013.7026.3037
Canada2015SNAP 4Dx37625.3101.2733
Czech Republic2011IFAT926772.863.7481.9130
Denmark2010SNAP 4Dx3908722.3118.1826.4430
France2005ELISA4244811.328.3014.3330
France2009ELISA4085513.4810,1716.7930
Guatemala2005IFAT741013.515.7221.3030
Italy2003IFAT56123.5608.5030
Italy2008IFAT79313416.9014.2919.5130
Italy2008IFAT154127.793.5612.0330
Italy2010IFAT1352317.0410.6923.3830
Italy2019IFAT47910922.7619.0026.5112
Mongolia2018IFAT2169142.1335.5448.7139
Tunisia2014IFAT3435616.3312.4120.243

Characteristics of the study group considering gender, age, and breed of sampled horses

VariableHealthy group (n = 108)Affected group (n = 20)
Gender
  Male6214
  Female466
Age (years)
  1–115414
  12–16333
  17–25213
Breed
  Arabian8515
  Barb132
  Arab–Barb103

Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi and Anaplasma phagocytophilum by ELISA and IFAT

Pathogen IFAT (n = 128) ELISA (n = 128)
PositiveSeroprevalence (%) (95% CI)PositiveSeroprevalence (%) (95% CI)
B. burgdorferi only1814.1 (9.1–21.1)

The prevalence was significantly different by IFAT and ELISA (P < 0.05)

64.7 (2.2–9.9)

The prevalence was significantly different by IFAT and ELISA (P < 0.05)

A. phagocytophilum only1511.7 (7.2–18.4)

The prevalence was not significantly different by IFAT and ELISA (P > 0.05)

2015.6 (10.4–22.9)

The prevalence was not significantly different by IFAT and ELISA (P > 0.05)

A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi (co-infection)107.8 (4.3–13.8)

The prevalence was not significantly different by IFAT and ELISA (P > 0.05)

1310.2 (6.0–16.7)

The prevalence was not significantly different by IFAT and ELISA (P > 0.05)

B. burgdorferi (total)2821.87 (13.79–28.20)

The prevalence was not significantly different between methods (P > 0.05)

1914.84 (7.86–20.13)

The prevalence was not significantly different between methods (P > 0.05)

A. phagocytophilum (total)2519.53 (12.06–25.93)

The prevalence was not significantly different between methods (P > 0.05)

3325.87 (17.34–32.65)

The prevalence was not significantly different between methods (P > 0.05)

Agreement analysis between IFAT and ELISA tests

B. burgdorferiIFATStatistics
ELISASeraPositiveNegativeTotalκ = 0.56 McNemar P < 0.01 SS
Positive15419% agreement = 86.7
Negative1396109Relative sensitivity = 53.6%
Total28100128Relative specificity = 96%
A. phagocytophilumIFAT Statistics
ELISASeraPositiveNegativeTotalκ = 0.61 McNemar P < 0.01 SS
Positive201333% agreement = 85.9
Negative59095Relative sensitivity = 80%
Total25103128Relative specificity = 87.4%

Seroprevalence of B_ burgforferi in the world

CountryYearMethodnPositivePrevalence (%)Lower limitUpper limitReference
Algeria2019IFAT1282821.8814.7129.04this study
Brazil2018ELISA36721458.3153.2763.3634
Canada2015SNAP 4Dx37661.600.0332.8633
France2010SNAP 4Dx40813432.8428.2937.4025
FrenchGuiana2010SNAP 4Dx49000025
Italy2013IFAT300217.004.119.8920
Italy2012SNAP 4Dx981515.318.1822.4338
Italy2012IFAT3869424.3520.0728.6311
Korea2016ELISA727405.503.847.1622
Mexico2001IFAT1003434.0024.7243.2831
Poland2008ELISA39510125.5721.2729.8735
Romania2011ELISA2603111.927.9815.8618
Sub-SaharanAfrica2010SNAP 4Dx113000025
Turkey2008ELISA300186.003.318.695
USA2012ELISA WB and21001758.337.159.5240
Language: English
Page range: 413 - 419
Submitted on: Dec 27, 2019
Accepted on: Jun 25, 2020
Published on: Jul 14, 2020
Published by: National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Abdelouahab Laamari, Naouelle Azzag, Safia Tennah, Salima-Yamina Derdour, Bernard China, Ryhan Bouabdallah, Farida Ghalmi, published by National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.