References
- Aagaard, J., & Rosenberger R. (2024). Experience without essentialism : On ‘posting’ phenomenology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.2355277.
- Adams, E., Kerr, S., & Wurzburg, E. A. (2020). The final cut? : The production of pedagogy and scholarship within a society of control. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 11(2). 58–79. https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.4117.
- Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks : An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307.
- Bailey, L. E., Warner, S., Davis, E. E., Myers, L., Taylor, J. K., & Williams, A. (2024). Teaching and learning visual and arts-based inquiry : Collaborative visions and possibilities in graduate education. The Qualitative Report, 29(2), 606–629. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.5859.
- Beasy K, Page L, Emery S, &Ayre I. (2016). Evolution or revolution in EE/SE research? A collaborative dialogue from first-year PhD students. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2016.3.
- Benozzo, A., & Carey, N. & Cozza, M, & Elmenhorst, C., Fairchild, N., Koro, M. & Taylor, C. (2019). Disturbing the academic conference machine : Post-qualitative returnings. Gender Work and Organization, 26(2), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12260.
- Brailas, A., & Papachristopoulos, K. (2023). Systems thinking, Rhizomes, and community-based qualitative research : An introduction to nomadic thematic analysis. In E. Tseliou, C. Demuth, E. Georgaca, & B. Gough (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of innovative qualitative psychological research (pp. 304–319). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003132721-28.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs : Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004.
- Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway : Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
- Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction : Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.927623.
- Barad, K. (2018). Troubling time/s and ecologies of nothingness : Re-turning, remembering, and facing the incalculable. In M. Fritsch, P. Lynes, & D. Wood (Eds.), Eco-deconstruction : Derrida and environmental philosophy (pp. 206–248). Fordham University Press.
- Bodén, L., & Gunnarsson, K. (2021). Nothing, anything, and everything : Conversations on postqualitative methodology. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(2), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420933295.
- Bozalek V., & Zembylas M. (2025) Psychology, the posts, and qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 22(3), 708–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.242571.
- Buono, A. & Gonzalez, C. (2017). Bodily writing and performative inquiry : Inviting an arts-based research methodology into collaborative doctoral research vocabularies. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 18, 1–21.
- Camiré, M. (2024). Critical posthumanisms, postqualitative inquiry, and conventional qualitative research : Some interrogations and contemplations on their entangled identities and futurities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.2347589.
- Christ, R., & Varga, B. (2024). (Im) possibilities and (in)stabilities of post-qualitative inquiry. In S. Mathews (Ed.), (Re)envisioning social studies education research : Current epistemological and methodological expansions, deconstructions, and creations (pp. 81–96).
- Class, B. (2023). Teaching research methods in education : Using the TPACK framework to reflect on praxis. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 47(3), 288–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2023.2270426.
- Clarke, B., & Parsons, J. (2013). Becoming rhizome researchers. Reconceptualizing educational research Methodology. 4, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.685.
- Correa, I, & Holbert, N. (2023). Material-led research : A posthumanist methodology for maker education practitioners. Digital Culture & Education, 14(5), 191–213.
- Collett, K.& van den Berg, C., & Verster, B. (2020). Sympoiesis ‘becoming with and through each other’ : Exploring collaborative writing as emergent academics. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning, 8, 168– https://doi.org/184.10.14426/cristal.v8iSI.
- Dahl-Tallgren, N. (2023). Becoming Artography : Movements of possibility in the art-making process of a Theatre-In-Education programme. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 14, 41–58. https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.5258.
- Darbellay, F. (2012). The circulation of knowledge as an interdisciplinary process : Travelling concepts, analogies and metaphors. Issues in Integrative Studies, 30, 1–18.
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A thousand plateaus : Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
- Firdaus, F., Zulfadilla, Z. & Caniago, F. (2021). Research methodology : Types in the new perspective. MANAZHIM, 3, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.36088/manazhim.v3i1.903.
- Fullagar, S. & Pavlidis, A., Hickey-Moody, A., & Coffey, Julia. (2021). Embodied movement as method : Attuning to affect as feminist experimentation. Somatechnics, 11, 174–190. https://doi.org/10.3366/soma.2021.0350.
- Fullagar, S., Pavlidis, A., & Stadler, R. (2017). Critical moments of (UN)doing doctoral supervision : Collaborative writing as rhizomatic practice. Knowledge Cultures, 5, 23–41. https://doi.org/10.22381/KC5420173.
- Gravett, K. (2021) Disrupting the doctoral journey : Re-imagining doctoral pedagogies and temporal practices in higher education, Teaching in Higher Education, 26(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1853694
- Gerrard, J., Rudolph, S., & Sriprakash, A. (2016). The politics of post-qualitative inquiry : History and power. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(5),1–34. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.6831.
- Gough, N. (1998). Studying research methodologies in education. Deakin University. Haeri Mazanderani, F., Danvers, E., Hinton-Smith, T., & Webb, R. (2022).
- Contortion, loss and moments for joy : Insights into writing groups for international doctoral students. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(4), 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2034146.
- Halman, A., & Oshlack, A. (2023). Catchii : Empowering literature review screening in healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.10.23285791.
- Haeri Mazanderani F., Danvers E., Hinton-Smith T., & Rebecca W. (2022). Contortion, loss and moments for joy : Insights into writing groups for international doctoral students, Teaching in Higher Education, 27(4), 577–592, https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2034146.
- Haraway, D. (1992). The promises of monsters : A regenerative politics for inapproporiate/d others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295–337).
- Huopalainen, A. (2020). Writing with the bitches. Organization, 29(6), 959–978. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420961533 (Original work published 2022).
- Jackson, Youngblood, A. (2017). Thinking without method. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 666–674.http://10.1177/1077800417725355.
- Jewitt, C., Price, S., & Xambo Sedo, A. (2016). Conceptualising and researching the body in digital contexts : Towards new methodological conversations across the arts and social sciences. Qualitative Research, 17(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116656036.
- Khan, J. & Raman, A. & Sambamoorthy, N., & Prashanth, K. (2023). Research methodology (methods, approaches and techniques). San international. Scientific publications. https://doi.org/10.59646/rmmethods.
- Kuby, C.R., & Rowsell, J. (2022). Magic(al)ing in a time of COVID-19 : Becoming literacies and new inquiry practices. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 31(1–2), 231–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2021.1966826.
- Kuby, C. R., Aguayo, R. C., Holloway, N., Mulligan, J., Shear, S. B., & Ward, A. (2015). Teaching, troubling, transgressing : Thinking with theory in a post-qualitative inquiry course. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(2), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800415617206.
- Leibowitz, B., & Naidoo, K. (2017). The potential for posthuman insights to effect socially just pedagogies. Education As Change, 21, 149–164.
- Lupton, D., & Watson, and A. (2020). Towards more-than-human digital data studies : Developing research-creation methods. Qualitative Research, 21(4), 463–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120939235.
- Lynch, S., & Kuntz, A. (2019). A critical autoethnography of a doctoral students’ research journey : Learning to take risks in the academy. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 10(2), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2019.1588762.
- Martínez-Arbelaiz, A., Gutiérrez-Cabello, A., Apraiz, E. & Gorospe, J. (2024). Juggling academic practice and care : Collaborative autoethnography within a Basque University research group. The Qualitative Report, 29, 1883–1900. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6627.
- Matos, J.F.; Piedade, J.; Freitas, A.; Pedro, N.; Dorotea, N.; Pedro, A.; Galego, C (2023). Teaching and learning research methodologies in education : A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 13, 173, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020173.
- Mazzei, L. A. (2021). Postqualitative inquiry : Or the necessity of theory. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(2), 198–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420932607.
- Mitchell, V., Gredley, S., & Carette, L. (2022). Participatory relationships matter : Doctoral students traversing the academy. Qualitative Inquiry, 29(1), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004221101591.
- Monforte, J., & Smith, B. (2024). The critical posthumanities and postqualitative inquiry in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 22(3), 559–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.2338899.
- Murris, K., & Bozalek, V. (2019) ‘Diffracting diffractive readings of texts as methodology : Some propositions’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(14), 1504–1517. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1570843.
- Myers, K. D., Cannon, S. O., & Bridges-Rhoads, S. (2017). Math is in the title : (Un)learning the subject in qualitative and post qualitative inquiry. International Review of Qualitative Research, 10(3), 309–326.
- Prestridge, S., Tan, S. C., Jacobsen, M., Hoppe, H. Ulrich, Angeli, C., Milrad, M., Pangeni, S. K., Kovatcheva, E., Kafyulilo, A., Flanagan, B., & Khaddage, F. (2024). Disconnected connections of learning beyond formal schooling through human–computer–human interactions. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29, 1791–1807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09779-6.
- Regulation (EU) 2021/695 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021 establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1290/2013 and (EU) No 1291/2013 (Text with EEA relevance) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32021R0695.
- Schneider, K. (2024). What is learning? Psychology, 15(15), 779–799. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2024.155047.
- St. Pierre, E. A. (2020). Why post qualitative inquiry? Qualitative Inquiry, 27(2), 163–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420931142.
- St. Pierre, E. A. (2016). Untraining educational researchers. Research in Education, 96(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034523716664581.
- St.Pierre, E. A. (2024). Reading for post qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 37(6), 1600–1610.
- St. Pierre E. A. (2014). A brief and personal history of post qualitative research : Toward ‘post inquiry.’ Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 2–19.
- St. Pierre, E. A. (2021). Post qualitative inquiry, the refusal of method, and the risk of the new. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419863005.
- St. Pierre, E. A. (2019). Post qualitative inquiry, the refusal of method, and the risk of the new. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419863005.
- Sintonen, S. (2024). Stones, situated writing and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 56(14), 1366–1377. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2024.2393424.
- OECD. (2022). Who cares about using education research in policy and practice? : Strengthening Research Engagement, Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/d7ff793d-en.
- Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hrobjartsson, ´ A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021a). The PRISMA 2020 statement : An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Research Methods and Reporting, 1–6. BMJ, 372. https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n71, https://doi.org/doi:10.1136/bmj.n71, arXiv https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n71.full.pdf.
- Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., & Moher, D. (2021b). Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews : Development of the prisma 2020 statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 103–112.
- Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hrobjartsson, ´ A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … McKenzie, J. E. (2021c). Prisma 2020 explanation and elaboration : Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. Research Methods and Reporting, 1–36 BMJ, 372. https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n160, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160, arXiv https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n160.full.pdf.
- Pather, S. (2019). Reflections on being a successful academic researcher. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 17, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.34190/JBRM.17.2.01.
- Randles, R., & Finnegan, A. (2023). Guidelines for writing a systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 125, 105803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105803.
- Ruck, Andrew & Mannion, Greg. (2019). Fieldnotes and situational analysis in environmental education research : Experiments in new materialism. Environmental Education Research, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1594172.
- Singh, K., Southcott, J., & Lyons, D. (2023). Dismantling methodological silos and normative confinements in qualitative research : A shared meal of knowledge in a postqualitative Langar space. The Qualitative Report, 28(7), 2075–2094. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5522.
- Singh, K., Southcott, J., & Lyons, D. (2022). Knowledge meals, research relationships, and postqualitative offerings : Enacting langar (a sikh tradition of a shared meal) as pedagogy of doctoral supervision. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221097223.
- Singh, K., Southcott, J, & Lyons, D. (2021). From our post qualitative kitchen : A Langar meal of knowledge. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 36, 1–16. 10.1080/09518398.2021.198205.
- Suopajärvi, T. (2023). Moving with affects in Finnish academia : Resistance practices of social science and humanities researchers and a possibility of change. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 27(6), 1233–1248. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494231216213.
- Thomas, M., & Bellingham, R. (2020). Post-qualitative research and innovative methodologies. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350062078.
- Taylor, C. (2016). Rethinking the empirical in higher education : Post-qualitative inquiry as a less comfortable social science. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 40(3), 311–324.
- UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO recommendation on Open Science. https://www.unesco-floods.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/379949eng.pdf.
- Zhu, J., & Liu, W. A. (2020). A tale of two databases : The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8.