References
- Ansell, N. (2009). Childhood and the politics of scale: Descaling children’s geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 33(2), 190-209.
- Bollig, S. (2015). The multiple geographies of early childhood education and care: An ethnographic approach to the places and spaces of young children’s care arrangements. In S. Bollig, M.S. Honig, S. Neumann, & C. Seele (Eds.), MultiPluriTrans in educational ethnography (pp. 99-118). Bielefeld und Columbia: Transcript.
- Bollig, S., Honig, M.-S., & Nienhaus, S. (2016). Vielfalt betreuter Kindheiten. Ethnographische Fallstudien zu den Bildungs- und Betreuungsarrangements junger Kinder. Luxembourg: Université du Luxembourg.
- Bollig, S., & Millei, Z. (2018). Spaces of early childhood. Introduction. Journal of Pedagogy, 9(1), 5-20.
- Brooker, L. (2006). From home to the home corner: Observing children’s identity-maintenance in early childhood settings. Children & Society, 20, 116–127.
- Betz, T. (2013). Ungleichheit im Vorschulalter. Einrichtungsbezogene Bildungs- und Betreuungsarrangements unter sozialwissenschaftlicher Perspektive. In M. Wolf, E. Dietrich-Daum, M. Heidegger, & E. Fleischer (Eds.), Child Care. Kulturen, Konzepte und Politiken der Fremdbetreuung von Kindern (p. 117–131). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
- Claessens, A., & Chen, J. (2013). Multiple child care arrangement and child well being: Early care experiences in Australia. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 49-61.
- Clark, A., Kjorholt, A.T., & Moss, P. (2005). Beyond listening. Children’s perspectives on early childhood services. Bristol, University Press.
- Creswell, T. (2011). Mobilities I: Catching Up. Progress in Human Geography, 35 (4), 550–558.
- Corsaro, W. (2018). The sociology of childhood (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- De Groot, K. (2010). “There’s Elly, It Must Be Tuesday”: Discontinuity in child care programs and its impact on the development of peer relationships in young children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38 (2), 153-164.
- Fenwick, T. (2012). Reading educational reform with actor’network theory: Fluid spaces, otherings, and ambivalences. In T. Fenwick, & R. Edwards (Eds.), Researching education through actor’network theory (pp. 97-116). Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley.
- Gulløv, E. (2003). Creating a natural place for children: An ethnographic study of Danish kindergartens. In K. Fog Olwig, & E. Gulløv (Eds.), Children’s places – cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 23-38). London, Routledge.
- Heedegard, M. (2012). A cultural-historical approach to children’s development of multiple cultural identities. In M. Kontopodis, C. Wulf, & B. Fichtner (Eds.), Children, development and education (pp. 117-135). Dodrecht: Springer.
- Hengst, H. (2018). Multiples Werden, lebenslanges Lernen. In T. Betz, S. Bollig, M. Joos, & S. Neumann (Eds.): Institutionalisierungen von Kindheit (pp. 94-110). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
- Honig, M.-S., & Bock, T. (2017). Luxembourg – ECEC workforce profile. In I. Oberhuemer, & I. Schreyer (Eds.), Workforce profiles in systems of early childhood education and care in Europe. www.seepro.eu/English/Country_Reports.html.
- Karila, K., & Alasuutari, M. (2012). Drawing partnership on paper: How do the forms for individual educational plans frame parent-teacher relationship? International Journal about Parents in Education, 6 (1), 14–26.
- Kousholt, D. (2011). Researching family through the everyday lives of children across home and day care in Denmark. Ethos, 39(1), 98-114.
- Markström, A., & Halldén, G. (2009). Children’s strategies for agency in preschool. Children and Society, 23(2), 112–122.
- Massey, D. (2003). Space, place and gender. Minneapolis: University Press.
- Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: SAGE.
- Mohn, B., Bollig, S. (2016). Children navigating borders. Transition practices in day care routine. Double-DVD. Berlin: DorhmannVerlag.
- OECD (2015). Starting strong IV: Monitoring quality in early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- O’Connell, R. (2010). How is childminding family like? Family day care, food and the reproduction of identity at the public/private interface. The Sociological Review, 58(4), 563-586.
- Qvortrup, J., Corsaro, W.A., & Honig, M.-S. (Eds.). (2009). The palgrave handbook of childhood studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
- Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Schatzki, T. R. (2011). Where the action is. On large social phenomena such as sociotechnical regimes. Working Paper 1 of the Sustainable Practices Research Group. http://www.sprg.ac.uk/uploads/schatzki-wp1.pdf (Accessed: 12.10.2013).
- Seele, C. (2016). ‘Doing education’ between monolingual norms and multilingual realities: An ethnography of multilingualism in early childhood education and care. London: E & E Publishers.
- Sheppard, E. (2002). The spaces and times of globalization: Place, scale, networks, and positionality. Economic Geography, 78(3), 307-330.
- Stratigos, T., Bradley, B., & Sumsion, J. (2014). Infants, family day care and the politics of belonging. International Journal of Early Childhood, 46(2), 171-186.
- Sylva, K., Stein, A. Leach, P., Barnes, J., Malmberg, L.E. and the FCCC-team (2006). Family and child factors related to the use of non-maternal infant care. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22(1), 118-136.
- Vandenbroeck, M., De Visscher, S., Van Nuffel, K., & Ferla, J. (2008). Mothers’ search for infant child care: The dynamic relation between availability and desirability in a continental European welfare state. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(2), 245-258.