Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Assessing Interviewer Performance in Approaching Reissued Initial Nonrespondents

Open Access
|Jul 2020

References

  1. Barbier, S., C. Wuyts, P. Italiano, and G. Loosveldt. 2016. European Social Survey Round 7 Belgium: Process evaluation for the data collection. Leuven: KU Leuven.
  2. Beullens, K., J. Billiet, and G. Loosveldt. 2009. Selection strategies for refusal conversion of four countries in the European Social Survey, 3rd round. Leuven: KU Leuven.
  3. Beullens, K. and G. Loosveldt. 2012. “Should high response rates really be a primary objective?” Survey Practice 5(3): 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2012-0019.10.29115/SP-2012-0019
  4. Beullens, K., G. Loosveldt, C. Vandenplas C., and I. Stoop. 2018. “Response rates in the European Social Survey: Increasing, decreasing, or a matter of fieldwork efforts? Survey methods: Insights from the field.” Available at: https://surveyinsights.org/?p=9673 (accessed May 2020).
  5. Blom, A., E. de Leeuw, and J. Hox. 2011. “Interviewer effects on nonresponse in the European Social Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 27(2): 359–377. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/interviewer-effects-on-nonresponse-in-the-european-social-survey.pdf (accessed May 2020).
  6. Brick, J.M. and R. Tourangeau. 2017. “Responsive survey designs for reducing nonresponse bias.” Journal of Official Statistics 33(3): 735–752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2017-0034.10.1515/jos-2017-0034
  7. Burton, J., H. Laurie, and P. Lynn. 2006. “The long-term effectiveness of refusal conversion procedures on longitudinal surveys.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) 169(3): 459–478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00415.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00415.x
  8. Chun, A.Y., S.G. Heeringa, and B. Schouten. 2018. “Responsive and adaptive design for survey optimization.” Journal of Official Statistics 34(3): 581–597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2018-0028.10.2478/jos-2018-0028
  9. Curtin, R., S. Presser, and E. Singer. 2000. “The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64(4): 413–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/318638.10.1086/31863811171024
  10. Durrant, G., R. Groves, L. Staetsky, and F. Steele. 2010. “Effects of interviewer attitudes and behaviors on refusal in household surveys”. Public Opinion Quarterly 74(1): 1–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp098.10.1093/poq/nfp098
  11. European Social Survey. 2015. ESS Round 7 (2014/2015) Technical Report. London: ESS ERIC.
  12. European Social Survey. 2017. ESS Round 8 (2016/2017) Technical Report. London: ESS ERIC.
  13. Gideon, L. 2012. Handbook of survey methodology for the social sciences. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-3876-2
  14. Groves, R. 2006. “Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70(5): 646–675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl033.10.1093/poq/nfl033
  15. Groves, R.M. and M.P. Couper. 2012. Nonresponse in household interview surveys. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  16. Lynn, P. and P. Clarke. 2002. “Separating refusal bias and non-contact bias: Evidence from UK national surveys.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 51(3): 319–333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9884.00321.10.1111/1467-9884.00321
  17. O’Muircheartaigh, C. and P. Campanelli. 1999. “A multilevel exploration of the role of interviewers in survey non-response.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 162(3): 437–446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985X.00147.10.1111/1467-985X.00147
  18. Pickery, J. and G. Loosveldt. 2002. “A multilevel multinomial analysis of interviewer effects on various components of unit nonresponse.” Quality and Quantity 36(4): 427–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020905911108.10.1023/A:1020905911108
  19. Schouten, B., A. Peytchev, and J. Wagner. 2017. “Adaptive Survey Design.” Series on Statistics Handbooks, Chapman and Hall/CRC.10.1201/9781315153964
  20. Stoop, I. 2004. “Surveying nonrespondents.” Field Methods 16(1): 23–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X03259479.10.1177/1525822X03259479
  21. Stoop, I., A. Koch, V. Halbherr, R. Fitzgerald, and S. Widdop. 2014. Field procedures in the European Social Survey Round 7: Enhancing response rates. The Hague: European Social Survey, SCP. Available at: http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org (accessed June 2020).
  22. Tarnai, J. and D.L. Moore. 2008. “Measuring and improving telephone interviewer performance and productivity.” In Advances in telephone survey methodology, edited by E. de Leeuw, L. Japec, P.J. Lavrakas, M.W. Link, and R.L. Sangster. pp. 359–384, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470173404.ch17
  23. West, B.T. and K. Olson. 2010. “How much of interviewer variance is really nonresponse error variance?” Public Opinion Quarterly 74(5): 1004 – 1026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq061.10.1093/poq/nfq061
  24. Wright, G. 2015. “An empirical examination of the relationship between nonresponse rate and nonresponse bias.” Statistical Journal of the IAOS 31(2): 305–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/sji-140844.10.3233/sji-140844
  25. Wuyts, C., L. Jacobs, D. de Coninck, P. Italiano, and G. Loosveldt. 2018. European Social Survey Round 8 Belgium: Process evaluation for data collection. Leuven: KU Leuven.
Language: English
Page range: 589 - 607
Submitted on: Sep 1, 2018
Accepted on: Apr 1, 2020
Published on: Jul 24, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2020 Laurie Peeters, David De Coninck, Celine Wuyts, Geert Loosveldt, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.