Have a personal or library account? Click to login
How Standardized is Occupational Coding? A Comparison of Results from Different Coding Agencies in Germany Cover

How Standardized is Occupational Coding? A Comparison of Results from Different Coding Agencies in Germany

Open Access
|Mar 2019

References

  1. Belloni, M., A. Brugiavini, E. Meschi, and K. Tijdens. 2016. “Measuring and Detecting Errors in Occupational Coding: An Analysis of SHARE Data.” Journal of Official Statistics 32(4): 917–945. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JOS-2016-0049.10.1515/JOS-2016-0049
  2. Bergmann, M.M. and D. Joye. 2005. “Comparing Social Stratification Schemata: CAMSIS, CSP-CH, Goldthorpe, ISCO-88, Treiman, and Wright.” Cambridge Studies in Social Research 10: 1–35. Available at: https://www.sociology.cam.ac.uk/research/srg/cs10 (accessed January 2019).
  3. Billiet, J. and G. Loosveldt. 1988. “Improvement of the Quality of Responses to Factual Survey Question by Interviewer Training.” Public Opinion Quarterly 52: 190–211. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/269094.10.1086/269094
  4. Bundesagentur für Arbeit. 2011. Klassifikation der Berufe 2010. Systematischer und alphabetischer Teil mit Erläuterungen. Nürnberg: Bundesagentur für Arbeit.
  5. Bushnell, D. 1998. “An Evaluation of Computer-Assisted Occupation Coding.” In Proceedings of the International Conference New Methods for Survey Research, August 21–22, 1998: 23–26. Chilworth Manor, Southampton, United Kingdom.
  6. Campanelli, P., K. Thomson, N. Moon, and T. Staples. 1997. “The Quality of Occupational Coding in the United Kingdom.” In Survey Measurement and Process Quality, edited by L. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, E. De Leeuw, C. Dippo, N. Schwarz, and D. Trewin, 437–453. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118490013.ch19
  7. Cantor, D. and J.L. Esposito. 1992. “Evaluating Interviewer Style for Collecting Industry and Occupation Information.” Proceedings of the Section on Survey Methods, American Statistical Association: 661–666.
  8. Conrad, F.G., M.P. Couper, and J.W. Sakshaug. 2016. “Classifying Open-Ended Reports: Factors Affecting the Reliability of Occupation Codes.” Journal of Official Statistics 32(1): 75–92. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JOS-2016-0003.10.1515/JOS-2016-0003
  9. Desrosières, Alain. 1996. “Statistical Traditions: An Obstacle to International Comparisons?” In Cross-National Research Methods in the Social Sciences, edited by L. Hantrais and S. Mangen, 17–27. New York: Cassel.
  10. Elias, P. 1997. “Occupational Classification (ISCO-88): Concepts, Methods, Reliability, Validity and Cross-National Comparability.” OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers 20. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/304441717388.10.1787/304441717388
  11. Freelon, D.G. 2010. “Recal: Intercoder Reliability Calculation as a Web Service.” International Journal of Internet Science 5(1): 20–33. Available at: http://www.ijis.net/ijis5_1/ijis5_1_freelon.pdf (accessed January 2019).
  12. Ganzeboom, H.B.G. and D.J. Treiman. 1996. “Internationally Comparable Measures of Occupational Status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations.” Social Science Research 25: 201–239. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1996.0010.10.1006/ssre.1996.0010
  13. Ganzeboom, H.B.G. and D.J. Treiman. 2003. “Three Internationally Standardised Measures for Comparative Research on Occupational Status.” In Advances in Cross-National Comparison. A European Working Book for Demographic and Socio-Economic Variables, edited by J.H.P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik and C. Wolf, 159–193. New York: Kluwer Acadamic/Plenum Publishers.10.1007/978-1-4419-9186-7_9
  14. Ganzeboom, H.B.G. and D.J. Treiman. 2012. “International Stratification and Mobility File: Conversion Tools.” Amsterdam: Department of Social Research Methodology. Available at: http://www.harryganzeboom.nl/ismf/index.htm. Retrieved 2017/02/27.
  15. Geis, A. and J.H.P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik. 2000. “Stand der Berufsvercodung.” ZUMANachrichten 47: 103–128. Available at: https://www.gesis.org/fileadmin/upload/forschung/publikationen/zeitschriften/zuma_nachrichten/zn_47.pdf (accessed January 2019).
  16. Gweon, H., M. Schonlau, L. Kaczmirek, M. Blohm, and S. Steiner. 2017. “Three Methods for Occupation Coding Based on Statistical Learning.” Journal of Official Statistics 33(1): 101–122. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jos-2017-0006.10.1515/jos-2017-0006
  17. Hak, T. and T. Bernts. 1996. “Coder Training: Theoretical Training or Practical Socialization?” Qualitative Sociology 19(2): 235–257. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02393420.10.1007/BF02393420
  18. Hoffmann, E., P. Elias, B. Embury, and R. Thomas. 1995. What Kind of Work Do You Do? Data Collection and Processing Strategies When Measuring “Occupation” for Statistical Surveys and Administrative Records. Geneva: ILO.
  19. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J.H.P., D. Hess, and A. Geis. 2004. “Computerunterstützte Vercodung der International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-88).” ZUMANachrichten 55: 29–52. Available at: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/20762/ssoar-zuma-2004-55-hoffmeyer-zlotnik_et_al-computerunterstutzte_vercodung_der_international_standard.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed January 2016).
  20. International Labour Office (ILO). 2012. International Standard Classification of Occupations 2008 (ISCO-08): Structure, Group Definitions and Correspondence Tables. Geneva: ILO.
  21. Maaz, K., U. Trautwein, C. Gresch, O. Lüdtke, and R. Watermann. 2009. “Intercoder-Reliabilität bei der Berufscodierung nach der ISCO-88 und Validität des sozioökonomischen Status.” ZfE 12: 281–301. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11618-009-0068-0.10.1007/s11618-009-0068-0
  22. Schierholz, M., M. Gensicke, N. Tschersich, and F. Kreuter. 2017. “Occupation Coding During the Interview.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 181: 379–407. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12297.10.1111/rssa.12297
  23. ‘t Mannetje, A. and H. Kromhout. 2003. “The Use of Occupation and Industry Classifications in General Population Studies.” International Journal of Epidemiology 32: 419–428. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyg080.10.1093/ije/dyg08012777430
  24. Tijdens, K. 2014. “Dropout Rates and Response Times of an Occupation Search Tree in a Web Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 30(1): 23–43. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0002.10.2478/jos-2014-0002
  25. Tijdens, K. 2015. “Self-Identification of Occupation in Web Surveys: Requirements for Search Trees and Look-up Tables.” Survey Insights: Methods from the Field. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2015-00008.
Language: English
Page range: 167 - 187
Submitted on: Aug 1, 2017
|
Accepted on: Apr 1, 2018
|
Published on: Mar 26, 2019
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Natascha Massing, Martina Wasmer, Christof Wolf, Cornelia Zuell, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.