Flowering Phenology of Shrub Roses as a Sensitive Indicator of Meteorological Variability in Central Europe

Zofia Włodarczyk; Agnieszka Ziernicka-Wojtaszek; Renata Kędzior; Justyna Mazur

doi:10.2478/johr-2023-0038

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Flowering Phenology of Shrub Roses as a Sensitive Indicator of Meteorological Variability in Central Europe

Journal of Horticultural Research

Volume 31 (2023): Issue 2 (December 2023)

By: Zofia Włodarczyk, Agnieszka Ziernicka-Wojtaszek, Renata Kędzior and Justyna Mazur

Open Access

|Dec 2023

Figures & Tables

The course of the flowering of repeat-flowering roses with two flushes of blooms
AB – total flowering duration, CD – full flowering duration in first flush, EF – full flowering duration in second flush, and CD+EF – full flowering duration

Average annual air temperature values in Krakow in the years 1981–2019 and average ± SE annual air temperature (black line) and precipitation (grey bars) values in Krakow during the study period (2012–2019)

Classification of months according to temperature and precipitation in Krakow in the years 2012–2019

Table 1.

Average total flowering duration (as dependent variable) and full flowering duration of cultivar roses and the results of Spearman correlation with meteorological parameters from 2012–2019

Cultivar roses	Total flowering duration [days]	Full flowering duration [days]	Full flowering duration as a percentage of total flowering duration [%]	Spearman correlations
Cultivar roses	Total flowering duration [days]	Full flowering duration [days]		Average temperature [°C]	Precipitation [mm]
‘Abracadabra’	96.1	34.1	35.5	0.28*	−0.01
‘Clair Matin’	97.6	31.0	31.8	0.32*	−0.05
‘Compassion’	93.9	37.8	40.3	0.39*	0.00
‘Dirigent’	92.9	33.6	36.2	0.42*	0.04
‘Eden Rose’	105.0	53.3	50.8	0.36*	0.00
‘Fisherman’s Friend’	78.0	21.0	26.9	0.50*	0.01
‘Fred Loads‘	96.0	41.9	43.6	0.45*	0.03
‘Graham Thomas’	95.9	25.9	27.0	0.31*	0.02
‘Händel’	77.3	21.3	27.6	0.40*	0.05
‘Heritage’	88.6	29.0	32.7	0.42*	0.04
‘Ilse Haberland’	104.6	43.8	41.9	0.34*	0.00
‘Lichtkönigin Lucia’	96.6	31.3	32.4	0.34*	−0.07
‘Märchenland‘	74.6	28.1	37.7	0.38*	−0.03
‘Morgengrüss’	69.4	23.0	33.1	0.41*	−0.05
‘Mutabilis’	102.5	36.3	35.4	0.38*	−0.01
‘My Choice’	93.8	21.4	22.8	0.38*	−0.03
‘Old Master’ syn. ‘Rozentanz’	100.1	34.6	34.6	0.38*	−0.04
‘Peach Blossom’	91.8	30.3	33.0	0.39*	0.00
‘Pink Robusta’	57.5	10.3	17.9	0.40*	0.00
‘Robusta’	109.5	34.5	31.5	0.44*	0.02
‘Rokoko’	102.4	36.0	35.2	0.27*	−0.05
‘Romance’	102.5	46.4	45.3	0.37*	0.06
‘Rosarium Uetersen’	100.9	41.5	41.1	0.33*	0.03
‘Santana’	81.4	20.6	25.3	0.34*	−0.01
‘Schneewittchen’ syn. ‘Iceberg’	114.5	48.9	42.7	0.39*	−0.01
‘Shalom‘	81.1	28.3	34.9	0.48*	0.00
‘Smooth Prince’	100.4	37.3	37.2	0.42*	0.05
‘Swan Lake’	89.4	32.0	35.8	0.43*	−0.01
‘Tradition’	98.3	34.1	34.7	0.44*	−0.08
‘Ulmer Münster’	99.3	50.3	50.7	0.22*	−0.05
‘Veilchenblau’	31.1	20.6	66.2	0.25*	−0.09
‘Warwick Castle’	84.9	27.6	32.5	0.35*	−0.01
‘Westerland’	79.6	25.4	31.9	0.39*	−0.09
‘White Cockade’	81.0	30.4	37.5	0.45*	0.07
‘Wilhelm Hansmann’ syn. ‘Skyrocket’	99.4	43.4	43.7	0.35*	−0.06
‘William Shakespeare’	95.9	40.9	42.6	0.35*	0.01
‘Zephirine Drouhin’	80.5	16.3	20.2	0.40*	−0.05

* Spearman correlation results (p < 0.05)

Distribution of mean ± SE flowering durations of 37 rose cultivars during the growing season classified in SIMPER analysis based on an eight years: a – cultivars with dominant FS10, b – cultivars with dominant FS25, c – cultivars with dominant FS50, d – cultivars with dominant FS75, and e – cultivars with dominant FS100

Table 2.

SIMPER analysis of differences in rose cultivars (contributing more than 1%) according to five flowering stages (average dissimilarity 73.04%)

Cultivar	Flowering stages					Av. Diss.	Contrib. (%)	Cum. (%)
Cultivar	FS10	FS25	FS50	FS75	FS100	Av. Diss.	Contrib. (%)	Cum. (%)
‘Ulmer Münster’	1.30	1.42	1.38	1.21	1.57	3.17	4.34	4.34
‘Rosarium Uetersen’	1.62	1.93	1.24	0.88	1.36	2.55	3.49	7.83
‘Schneewittchen’ syn. ‘Iceberg’	2.00	1.69	1.05	1.33	1.79	2.46	3.37	11.20
‘Eden Rose’	1.32	1.60	1.46	1.64	1.25	2.46	3.37	14.57
‘Robusta’	2.62	1.51	0.95	0.94	0.96	2.40	3.28	17.85
‘Ilse Haberland’	1.66	1.80	1.19	1.58	0.75	2.32	3.18	21.03
‘Romance’	1.36	1.16	1.16	2.00	1.32	2.24	3.07	24.10
‘Mutabilis’	2.30	1.49	0.92	0.91	1.21	2.24	3.06	27.16
‘Smooth Prince’	1.87	1.73	1.00	1.15	1.00	2.17	2.97	30.12
‘Wilhelm Hansmann’ syn. ‘Skyrocket’	1.81	1.49	1.16	1.12	1.32	2.16	2.95	33.08
‘William Shakespeare’	2.13	1.33	1.16	0.88	1.18	2.13	2.91	35.99
‘Fred Loads’	1.46	1.29	1.98	1.12	0.79	2.08	2.84	38.83
‘Old Master’ syn. ‘Rozentanz’	1.98	1.78	0.76	0.79	1.46	2.06	2.82	41.65
‘Swan Lake’	1.74	1.73	1.08	0.82	0.75	2.05	2.81	44.45
‘Abracadabra’	1.87	1.78	0.97	0.85	1.00	2.04	2.80	47.25
‘Rokoko’	2.30	1.53	1.05	1.18	0.71	2.02	2.76	50.02
‘Lichtkönigin Lucia’	2.32	1.56	0.92	0.88	0.82	2.01	2.76	52.77
‘Tradition’	2.28	1.40	0.89	0.76	1.25	2.01	2.75	55.52
‘Clair Matin’	1.85	1.69	0.89	0.73	1.00	2.00	2.74	58.27
‘Graham Thomas’	1.72	2.29	0.60	0.79	0.86	2.00	2.74	61.01
‘Warwick Castle’	2.15	1.20	0.78	0.73	0.86	2.00	2.74	63.75
‘Compassion’	1.91	1.36	0.95	1.15	0.93	1.99	2.72	66.47
‘Dirigent’	2.30	1.04	0.57	0.82	1.54	1.91	2.62	69.09
‘Heritage’	1.91	1.69	1.19	0.76	0.43	1.90	2.60	71.69
‘My Choice’	2.77	1.42	0.70	0.67	0.39	1.86	2.55	74.24
‘Peach Blossom’	2.17	1.29	0.78	0.70	1.07	1.79	2.45	76.69
‘Zephirine Drouhin’	2.62	0.98	0.35	0.42	0.64	1.74	2.39	79.07
‘Shalom’	1.47	1.53	0.97	0.91	0.46	1.73	2.37	81.44
‘Fisherman’s Friend’	2.11	1.22	0.57	0.70	0.50	1.71	2.33	83.78
‘White Cockade’	1.96	0.89	0.68	1.06	0.82	1.69	2.31	86.09
‘Märchenland’	1.49	1.18	0.70	0.88	0.79	1.68	2.30	88.39
‘Santana’	2.43	1.02	0.49	0.46	0.75	1.64	2.25	90.63
‘Westerland’	1.79	1.11	0.65	0.70	0.82	1.58	2.16	92.79
‘Morgengrüss’	1.49	1.18	0.49	0.64	0.86	1.56	2.13	94.92
‘Händel’	2.13	1.16	0.46	0.79	0.50	1.51	2.06	96.99
‘Pink Robusta’	1.68	1.02	0.43	0.33	0.04	1.36	1.86	98.85
‘Veilchenblau’	0.32	0.29	0.38	0.42	1.04	0.84	1.15	100.00

Mean ± SE duration of rose FSs: FS10, FS25, FS50, FS75, and FS100 based on eight years of observation W – Wald’s statistics; p – significance level

Table 3.

Spearman correlation coefficients between all of the analyzed rose flowering stages and meteorological parameters (average temperature and precipitation)

Rose flowering stage	Average temperature [°C]		Precipitation [mm]
Rose flowering stage	Spearman correlation coefficient	p-values	Spearman correlation coefficient	p-values
FS10	0.31	0.003	−0.02	0.497
FS25	−0.36	0.002	−0.18	0.001
FS50	−0.57	0.0001	−0.11	<0.0001
FS75	−0.56	0.0002	−0.13	<0.0001
FS100	−0.14	0.083	−0.16	<0.0001

References

Authors

Metrics

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/johr-2023-0038 | Journal eISSN: 2353-3978 (formerly 2300-5009) | Journal ISSN: 2300-5009

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 189 - 204

Submitted on: Sep 1, 2023

Accepted on: Dec 1, 2023

Published on: Dec 31, 2023

Published by: National Institute of Horticultural Research

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Keywords:

warming,

Related subjects:

Ecology,

© 2023 Zofia Włodarczyk, Agnieszka Ziernicka-Wojtaszek, Renata Kędzior, Justyna Mazur, published by National Institute of Horticultural Research
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 31 (2023): Issue 2 (December 2023)

Flowering Phenology of Shrub Roses as a Sensitive Indicator of Meteorological Variability in Central Europe

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Table 1.

Figure 4.

Table 2.

Figure 5.

Table 3.

Paradigm

My account