Grafting Compatibility, Scion Growth, and Fusarium Wilt Disease Incidence of Intraspecific Grafted Tomato

Saman, Prakob; Kawicha, Praphat; Sangdee, Aphidech; Wongpakdee, Somporn; Rattanapolsan, Ladawan; Ponpang-Nga, Pancheewan; Suwor, Patcharaporn; Thanyasiriwat, Thanwanit

doi:10.2478/johr-2022-0020

References

Assunção M., Santos C., Brazão J., Eiras-Dias J.E., Fevereiro P. 2019. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying graft success in grapevine. BMC Plant Biology 19; 396; 17 p. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-019-1967-8.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bai Y., Lindhout P. 2007. Domestication and breeding of tomatoes: What have we gained and what can we gain in the future? Annals of Botany 100(5): 1085–1094. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcm150.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chitwood-Brown J., Vallad G.E., Lee T.G., Hutton S.F. 2021. Breeding for resistance to fusarium wilt of tomato: A review. Genes 12(11); 1673; 16 p. DOI: 10.3390/genes12111673.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fernández-García N., Carvajal M., Olmos E. 2004. Graft union formation in tomato plants: Peroxidase and catalase involvement. Annals of Botany 93(1): 53–60. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mch014.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gonzalez-Cendales Y., Catanzariti A.-M., Baker B., McGrath D.J., Jones D.A. 2016. Identification of I-7 expands the repertoire of genes for resistance to fusarium wilt in tomato to three resistance gene classes. Molecular Plant Pathology 17(3): 448–463. DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12294.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guan W., Zhao X., Hassell R., Thies J. 2012. Defense mechanisms involved in disease resistance of grafted vegetables. HortScience 47(2): 164–170. DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.47.2.164.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kawaguchi M., Taji A., Backhouse D., Oda M. 2008. Anatomy and physiology of graft incompatibility in solanaceous plants. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 83(5): 581–588. DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2008.11512427.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kubota C., McClure M.A., Kokalis-Burelle N., Bausher M.G., Rosskopf E.N. 2008. Vegetable grafting: History, use, and current technology status in North America. HortScience 43(6): 1664–1669. DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.43.6.1664.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Li D., Han F., Liu X., Lv H., Li L., Tian H., Zhong, C. 2021. Localized graft incompatibility in kiwifruit: Analysis of homografts and heterografts with different root-stock and scion combinations. Scientia Horticulturae 283; 110080. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110080.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25(4): 402–408. DOI: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Louws F.J., Rivard C.L., Kubota C. 2010. Grafting fruiting vegetables to manage soilborne pathogens, foliar pathogens, arthropods and weeds. Scientia Horticulturae 127(2): 127–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.023.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Manickam R., Chen J.-R., Sotelo-Cardona P., Kenyon L., Srinivasan R. 2021. Evaluation of different bacterial wilt resistant eggplant rootstocks for grafting tomato. Plants 10(1); 75; 12 p. DOI: 10.3390/plants10010075.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marlatt M.L., Correll J.C., Kaufmann P., Cooper P.E. 1996. Two genetically distinct populations of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici race 3 in the United States. Plant Disease 80(12): 1336–1342. DOI: 10.1094/pd-80-1336.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mascia T., Santovito E., Gallitelli D., Cillo F. 2010. Evaluation of reference genes for quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction normalization in infected tomato plants. Molecular Plant Pathology 11(6): 805–816. DOI: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00646.x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Musa I., Rafii M.Y., Ahmad K., Ramlee S.I., Md Hatta M.A., Magaji U. et al. 2021. Influence of wild relative rootstocks on eggplant growth, yield and fruit physicochemical properties under open field conditions. Agriculture 11(10); 943; 16 p. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11100943.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nocito F.F., Espen L., Fedeli C., Lancilli C., Musacchi S., Serra S. et al. 2010. Oxidative stress and senescence-like status of pear calli co-cultured on suspensions of incompatible quince microcalli. Tree Physiology 30(4): 450–458. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpq006.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Parisi M., Pentangelo A., D’Alessandro A., Festa G., Francese G., Navarro A. et al. 2022. Grafting effects on bioactive compounds, chemical and agronomic traits of ‘Corbarino’ tomato grown under greenhouse healthy conditions. Horticultural Plant Journal. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpj.2022.03.001. [in press]
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pina A., Errea P. 2005. A review of new advances in mechanism of graft compatibility–incompatibility. Scientia Horticulturae 106(1): 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2005.04.003.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Prihatna C., Barbetti M.J., Barker S.J. 2018. A novel tomato fusarium wilt tolerance gene. Frontiers in Microbiology 9; 1226; 11 p. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01226.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Quiroga M., Guerrero C., Botella M.A., Barceló A., Amaya I., Medina M.I. et al. 2000. A tomato peroxidase involved in the synthesis of lignin and suberin. Plant Physiology 122(4): 1119–1128. DOI: 10.1104/pp.122.4.1119.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reyad N.E.H.A., El-Sayed S.F., Azoz S.N. 2021. Evaluation of grafting using cucurbit interspecific hybrids to control fusarium wilt in cucumber. Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology 22(37–38): 50–63.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rivard C.L., Louws F.J., 2008. Grafting to manage soilborne diseases in heirloom tomato production. HortScience 43(7): 2104–2111. DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.43.7.2104.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Spanò R., Ferrara M., Gallitelli D., Mascia T. 2020. The role of grafting in the resistance of tomato to viruses. Plants 9(8); 1042; 20 p. DOI: 10.3390/plants9081042.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Srinivas C., Devi D.N., Murthy K.N., Mohan C.D., Lakshmeesha T.R., Singh B.P. et al. 2019. Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici causal agent of vascular wilt disease of tomato: Biology to diversity – A review. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 26(7): 1315–1324. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.06.002.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tedesco S., Fevereiro P., Kragler F., Pina A. 2022. Plant grafting and graft incompatibility: A review from the grapevine perspective. Scientia Horticulturae 299; 111019; 12 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111019.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vitale A., Rocco M., Arena S., Giuffrida F., Cassaniti C., Scaloni A. et al. 2014. Tomato susceptibility to Fusarium crown and root rot: Effect of grafting combination and proteomic analysis of tolerance expression in the rootstock. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 83: 207–216. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.08.006.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang H., Zhou P., Zhu W., Wang F. 2019. De novo comparative transcriptome analysis of genes differentially expressed in the scion of homografted and heterografted tomato seedlings. Scientific Reports 9; 20240. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-56563-z.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Xie L., Dong C., Shang Q. 2019. Gene co-expression network analysis reveals pathways associated with graft healing by asymmetric profiling in tomato. BMC Plant Biology 19; 373; 12 p. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-019-1976-7.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yang T., Zhang P., Pan J., Amanullah S., Luan F., Han W., Liu H., Wang X. 2022. Genome-wide analysis of the peroxidase gene family and verification of lignin synthesis-related genes in watermelon. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23(2); 642; 25 p. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23020642.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zarrouk O., Testillano P.S., Risueño M.C., Moreno M.Á., Gogorcena Y. 2010. Changes in cell/tissue organization and peroxidase activity as markers for early detection of graft incompatibility in peach/plum combinations. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 135(1): 9–17. DOI: 10.21273/jashs.135.1.9.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zeist A.R., Giacobbo C.L., da Silva Neto G.F., Zeist R.A., Dorneles K. da R., de Resende J.T.V. 2018. Compatibility of tomato cultivar Santa Cruz Kada grafted on different Solanaceae species and control of bacterial wilt. Horticultura Brasileira 36(3): 377–381. DOI: 10.1590/s0102-053620180315.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang Z.H., Li M.M., Cao B.L., Chen Z.J., Xu K. 2021. Grafting improves tomato yield under low nitrogen conditions by enhancing nitrogen metabolism in plants. Protoplasma 258: 1077–1089. DOI: 10.1007/s00709-021-01623-3.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Grafting Compatibility, Scion Growth, and Fusarium Wilt Disease Incidence of Intraspecific Grafted Tomato

References

Paradigm

My account