Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Clear and cloudy juice technology used on laboratory scale
Clear and cloudy juice technology used on laboratory scale

Figure 2

Juice yield during pressing with or without enzyme mash treatment (averages for 3 investigated seasons; bars depict a standard deviation between seasons)
Juice yield during pressing with or without enzyme mash treatment (averages for 3 investigated seasons; bars depict a standard deviation between seasons)

Figure 3

Effect of enzymation on juice yield of scab resistant cultivars (the point means apple cultivar each season)
Effect of enzymation on juice yield of scab resistant cultivars (the point means apple cultivar each season)

Figure 4

PCA projection of differences and similarities of sensory quality of cloudy juices in 2006 season; sensory characteristic (○), apple cultivar (•). Abbreviations: Taste A (acceptability), Taste B (sour–sweet balance) Code of cultivars: see Table 1
PCA projection of differences and similarities of sensory quality of cloudy juices in 2006 season; sensory characteristic (○), apple cultivar (•). Abbreviations: Taste A (acceptability), Taste B (sour–sweet balance) Code of cultivars: see Table 1

Figure 5

PCA projection of differences and similarities of sensory quality of cloudy juices in 2008 season Abbreviations: see Fig. 4.
PCA projection of differences and similarities of sensory quality of cloudy juices in 2008 season Abbreviations: see Fig. 4.

Sensory results on 10 point scale for cloudy and clear juice (averages for 3 investigated seasons)

CultivarCloudy juiceClear juice

AromaColorTaste*Overall qualityAromaColorTaste*Overall quality
‘Ahrista’7.1 ± 0.75.7 ± 0.37.3 ± 0.37.5 ± 0.27.5 ± 1.57.0 ± 0.56.8 ± 0.96.6 ± 0.2
‘Angold’6.3 ± 0.53.5 ± 0.56.8 ± 0.56.3 ± 0.86.5 ± 1.36.2 ± 0.56.3 ± 0.76.4 ± 0.6
‘Antonovka’5.9 ± 1.44.4 ± 0.83.4 ± 1.53.3 ± 0.86.8 ± 1.46.8 ± 1.72.6 ± 1.12.5 ± 0.1
‘Ariwa’6.1 ± 2.04.4 ± 1.16.7 ± 0.66.2 ± 0.66.2 ± 1.36.2 ± 0.86.4 ± 0.46.5 ± 0.5
‘Champion’6.0 ± 0.46.8 ± 0.37.0 ± 0.46.7 ± 0.35.8 ± 0.82.8 ± 0.76.1 ± 0.45.4 ± 0.8
‘Enterprise’5.5 ± 0.74.8 ± 1.56.6 ± 0.56.3 ± 0.26.5 ± 1.16.7 ± 1.06.5 ± 0.76.5 ± 0.5
‘Florina’6.1 ± 0.95.0 ± 0.26.4 ± 0.76.1 ± 1.06.9 ± 0.57.0 ± 0.26.6 ± 0.86.7 ± 0.3
‘Free Redstar’5.4 ± 0.44.7 ± 0.44.4 ± 0.93.9 ± 0.55.9 ± 1.77.8 ± 1.05.9 ± 0.85.8 ± 1.6
‘Freedom’6.0 ± 0.65.4 ± 1.65.6 ± 0.15.5 ± 0.66.8 ± 0.86.5 ± 0.85.0 ± 0.44.9 ± 0.5
‘Gerlinde’7.2 ± 0.34.9 ± 0.46.9 ± 0.56.6 ± 0.46.6 ± 1.86.0 ± 1.45.8 ± 0.85.5 ± 1.5
‘Gold Milenium’6.7 ± 0.63.3 ± 0.47.6 ± 0.27.0 ± 0.06.8 ± 1.17.5 ± 0.37.3 ± 0.37.7 ± 0.0
‘Gold Star’6.7 ± 0.85.1 ± 0.15.5 ± 0.35.8 ± 0.66.3 ± 1.86.9 ± 0.66.4 ± 0.15.9 ± 0.2
‘Medea’6.0 ± 0.84.4 ± 1.36.6 ± 1.06.6 ± 0.36.1 ± 1.56.9 ± 0.16.8 ± 0.16.5 ± 0.5
‘Melfree’5.5 ± 0.74.3 ± 1.16.0 ± 0.45.8 ± 0.66.4 ± 1.57.1 ± 0.85.5 ± 1.85.1 ± 2.1
‘Novamac’5.9 ± 0.74.2 ± 1.14.6 ± 0.74.7 ± 1.06.4 ± 1.74.4 ± 1.45.4 ± 1.25.5 ± 0.8
‘Rajka’6.6 ± 0.55.8 ± 1.57.0 ± 0.57.1 ± 0.76.1 ± 1.86.3 ± 0.96.2 ± 1.16.4 ± 1.3
‘Rebella’6.3 ± 1.44.7 ± 1.45.5 ± 1.25.2 ± 1.95.0 ± 1.23.3 ± 0.64.9 ± 0.64.7 ± 0.4
‘Regine’5.3 ± 0.95.1 ± 0.63.4 ± 0.13.3 ± 0.16.3 ± 0.36.6 ± 0.83.1 ± 1.03.6 ± 1.2
‘Reglindis’6.0 ± 1.04.7 ± 1.45.1 ± 1.65.1 ± 2.05.2 ± 2.86.9 ± 1.34.5 ± 2.14.5 ± 1.5
‘Renora’6.3 ± 0.73.9 ± 0.74.7 ± 1.04.0 ± 0.66.2 ± 1.17.0 ± 0.85.0 ± 0.55.3 ± 0.5
‘Retina’6.2 ± 0.52.8 ± 0.55.7 ± 0.65.6 ± 0.96.1 ± 1.57.0 ± 0.86.6 ± 0.66.4 ± 1.7
‘Rewena’6.7 ± 1.35.5 ± 0.94.6 ± 1.34.7 ± 1.16.5 ± 1.15.9 ± 0.73.7 ± 0.23.7 ± 0.4
‘Rosana’6.1 ± 1.75.2 ± 0.65.1 ± 0.85.1 ± 0.46.5 ± 1.16.1 ± 1.45.5 ± 1 05.8 ± 1.1
‘Rubinola’6.8 ± 0.97.7 ± 0.56.4 ± 1.17.4 ± 0.46.7 ± 0.44.3 ± 0.85.6 ± 0.65.9 ± 0.7
‘Sawa’6.4 ± 1.55.1 ± 1.15.9 ± 1.75.7 ± 1.67.0 ± 1.36.2 ± 1.75.3 ± 1.55.3 ± 1.1
‘Selena’6.6 ± 0.44.4 ± 1.45.7 ± 1.75.3 ± 1.66.5 ± 1.66.3 ± 0.46.8 ± 0.46.5 ± 0.6
‘Topaz’6.8 ± 1.15.2 ± 1.55.9 ± 0.75.8 ± 0.96.7 ± 0.66.2 ± 1.55.5 ± 1.05.8 ± 0.6

Cultivar differences in soluble solids and acidity of directly pressed apple juice without enzymation (average for 3 seasons)

CultivarCODEOriginSoluble solids [%]Acidity [g·L−1]Soluble solids/acidity
‘Ahrista’AHRGermany11.38 ± 0.835.45 ± 1.3820.9
‘Angold’ANGCzech Republic12.85 ± 1.275.17 ± 1.9724.9
‘Antonovka’ANTRussia10.03 ± 1.5510.35 ± 0.899.7
‘Ariwa’ARISwitzerland12.14 ± 0.415.21 ± 0.8623.3
‘Champion’CHACzech Republic13.41 ± 0.613.1 ± 1.1143.3
‘Enterprise’ENTUSA13.50 ± 0.337.22 ± 1.7518.7
‘Florina’FLOFrance12.54 ± 1.305.13 ± 1.2124.4
‘Free Redstar’FRSPoland12.19 ± 1.286.22 ± 2.2719.6
‘Freedom’FRMUSA12.41 ± 0.917.18 ± 1.6317.3
‘Gerlinde’GERGermany12.75 ± 1.187.12 ± 2.6117.9
‘Gold Milenium’GOMPoland13.28 ± 0.194.43 ± 1.1130.0
‘Gold Star’GSCzech Republic11.62 ± 0.624.78 ± 1.1624.3
‘Medea’MDAPoland12.52 ± 0.686.01 ± 2.8320.8
‘Melfree’MELPoland13.34 ± 0.965.76 ± 1.8023.2
‘Novamac’NOMCanada11.79 ± 0.607.19 ± 0.3416.4
‘Rajka’RAJCzech Republic13.00 ± 1.565.59 ± 1.4823.3
‘Rebella’RBLGermany12.91 ± 1.507.73 ± 2.4516.7
‘Regine’RGNGermany13.90 ± 1.138.26 ± 2.0216.8
‘Reglindis’REGGermany12.67 ± 0.7811.07 ± 2.1711.4
‘Renora’RNRGermany13.24 ± 0.679.25 ± 1.3014.3
‘Retina’RETGermany12.45 ± 0.824.77 ± 1.7626.1
‘Rewena’REWGermany12.59 ± 0.809.22 ± 2.4613.7
‘Rosana’ROSCzech Republic11.54 ± 0.667.84 ± 2.7414.7
‘Rubinola’RBNCzech Republic13.36 ± 1.006.1 ± 0.7021.9
‘Sawa’SAWPoland13.07 ± 0.477.41 ± 1.5717.6
‘Selena’SELCzech Republic11.28 ± 0.733.94 ± 1.4228.6
‘Topaz’TOPCzech Republic13.82 ± 0.627.81 ± 2.0417.7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/johr-2021-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2353-3978 | Journal ISSN: 2300-5009
Language: English
Page range: 23 - 34
Submitted on: Jun 1, 2020
Accepted on: Feb 1, 2021
Published on: Apr 14, 2021
Published by: National Institute of Horticultural Research
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2021 Monika Mieszczakowska-Frąc, Witold Płocharski, Dorota Kruczyńska, Jarosław Markowski, published by National Institute of Horticultural Research
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.