Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Scab Resistant Apple Cultivars for Juice Production Cover

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Clear and cloudy juice technology used on laboratory scale

Figure 2

Juice yield during pressing with or without enzyme mash treatment (averages for 3 investigated seasons; bars depict a standard deviation between seasons)

Figure 3

Effect of enzymation on juice yield of scab resistant cultivars (the point means apple cultivar each season)

Figure 4

PCA projection of differences and similarities of sensory quality of cloudy juices in 2006 season; sensory characteristic (○), apple cultivar (•). Abbreviations: Taste A (acceptability), Taste B (sour–sweet balance) Code of cultivars: see Table 1

Figure 5

PCA projection of differences and similarities of sensory quality of cloudy juices in 2008 season Abbreviations: see Fig. 4.

Sensory results on 10 point scale for cloudy and clear juice (averages for 3 investigated seasons)

CultivarCloudy juiceClear juice

AromaColorTaste*Overall qualityAromaColorTaste*Overall quality
‘Ahrista’7.1 ± 0.75.7 ± 0.37.3 ± 0.37.5 ± 0.27.5 ± 1.57.0 ± 0.56.8 ± 0.96.6 ± 0.2
‘Angold’6.3 ± 0.53.5 ± 0.56.8 ± 0.56.3 ± 0.86.5 ± 1.36.2 ± 0.56.3 ± 0.76.4 ± 0.6
‘Antonovka’5.9 ± 1.44.4 ± 0.83.4 ± 1.53.3 ± 0.86.8 ± 1.46.8 ± 1.72.6 ± 1.12.5 ± 0.1
‘Ariwa’6.1 ± 2.04.4 ± 1.16.7 ± 0.66.2 ± 0.66.2 ± 1.36.2 ± 0.86.4 ± 0.46.5 ± 0.5
‘Champion’6.0 ± 0.46.8 ± 0.37.0 ± 0.46.7 ± 0.35.8 ± 0.82.8 ± 0.76.1 ± 0.45.4 ± 0.8
‘Enterprise’5.5 ± 0.74.8 ± 1.56.6 ± 0.56.3 ± 0.26.5 ± 1.16.7 ± 1.06.5 ± 0.76.5 ± 0.5
‘Florina’6.1 ± 0.95.0 ± 0.26.4 ± 0.76.1 ± 1.06.9 ± 0.57.0 ± 0.26.6 ± 0.86.7 ± 0.3
‘Free Redstar’5.4 ± 0.44.7 ± 0.44.4 ± 0.93.9 ± 0.55.9 ± 1.77.8 ± 1.05.9 ± 0.85.8 ± 1.6
‘Freedom’6.0 ± 0.65.4 ± 1.65.6 ± 0.15.5 ± 0.66.8 ± 0.86.5 ± 0.85.0 ± 0.44.9 ± 0.5
‘Gerlinde’7.2 ± 0.34.9 ± 0.46.9 ± 0.56.6 ± 0.46.6 ± 1.86.0 ± 1.45.8 ± 0.85.5 ± 1.5
‘Gold Milenium’6.7 ± 0.63.3 ± 0.47.6 ± 0.27.0 ± 0.06.8 ± 1.17.5 ± 0.37.3 ± 0.37.7 ± 0.0
‘Gold Star’6.7 ± 0.85.1 ± 0.15.5 ± 0.35.8 ± 0.66.3 ± 1.86.9 ± 0.66.4 ± 0.15.9 ± 0.2
‘Medea’6.0 ± 0.84.4 ± 1.36.6 ± 1.06.6 ± 0.36.1 ± 1.56.9 ± 0.16.8 ± 0.16.5 ± 0.5
‘Melfree’5.5 ± 0.74.3 ± 1.16.0 ± 0.45.8 ± 0.66.4 ± 1.57.1 ± 0.85.5 ± 1.85.1 ± 2.1
‘Novamac’5.9 ± 0.74.2 ± 1.14.6 ± 0.74.7 ± 1.06.4 ± 1.74.4 ± 1.45.4 ± 1.25.5 ± 0.8
‘Rajka’6.6 ± 0.55.8 ± 1.57.0 ± 0.57.1 ± 0.76.1 ± 1.86.3 ± 0.96.2 ± 1.16.4 ± 1.3
‘Rebella’6.3 ± 1.44.7 ± 1.45.5 ± 1.25.2 ± 1.95.0 ± 1.23.3 ± 0.64.9 ± 0.64.7 ± 0.4
‘Regine’5.3 ± 0.95.1 ± 0.63.4 ± 0.13.3 ± 0.16.3 ± 0.36.6 ± 0.83.1 ± 1.03.6 ± 1.2
‘Reglindis’6.0 ± 1.04.7 ± 1.45.1 ± 1.65.1 ± 2.05.2 ± 2.86.9 ± 1.34.5 ± 2.14.5 ± 1.5
‘Renora’6.3 ± 0.73.9 ± 0.74.7 ± 1.04.0 ± 0.66.2 ± 1.17.0 ± 0.85.0 ± 0.55.3 ± 0.5
‘Retina’6.2 ± 0.52.8 ± 0.55.7 ± 0.65.6 ± 0.96.1 ± 1.57.0 ± 0.86.6 ± 0.66.4 ± 1.7
‘Rewena’6.7 ± 1.35.5 ± 0.94.6 ± 1.34.7 ± 1.16.5 ± 1.15.9 ± 0.73.7 ± 0.23.7 ± 0.4
‘Rosana’6.1 ± 1.75.2 ± 0.65.1 ± 0.85.1 ± 0.46.5 ± 1.16.1 ± 1.45.5 ± 1 05.8 ± 1.1
‘Rubinola’6.8 ± 0.97.7 ± 0.56.4 ± 1.17.4 ± 0.46.7 ± 0.44.3 ± 0.85.6 ± 0.65.9 ± 0.7
‘Sawa’6.4 ± 1.55.1 ± 1.15.9 ± 1.75.7 ± 1.67.0 ± 1.36.2 ± 1.75.3 ± 1.55.3 ± 1.1
‘Selena’6.6 ± 0.44.4 ± 1.45.7 ± 1.75.3 ± 1.66.5 ± 1.66.3 ± 0.46.8 ± 0.46.5 ± 0.6
‘Topaz’6.8 ± 1.15.2 ± 1.55.9 ± 0.75.8 ± 0.96.7 ± 0.66.2 ± 1.55.5 ± 1.05.8 ± 0.6

Cultivar differences in soluble solids and acidity of directly pressed apple juice without enzymation (average for 3 seasons)

CultivarCODEOriginSoluble solids [%]Acidity [g·L−1]Soluble solids/acidity
‘Ahrista’AHRGermany11.38 ± 0.835.45 ± 1.3820.9
‘Angold’ANGCzech Republic12.85 ± 1.275.17 ± 1.9724.9
‘Antonovka’ANTRussia10.03 ± 1.5510.35 ± 0.899.7
‘Ariwa’ARISwitzerland12.14 ± 0.415.21 ± 0.8623.3
‘Champion’CHACzech Republic13.41 ± 0.613.1 ± 1.1143.3
‘Enterprise’ENTUSA13.50 ± 0.337.22 ± 1.7518.7
‘Florina’FLOFrance12.54 ± 1.305.13 ± 1.2124.4
‘Free Redstar’FRSPoland12.19 ± 1.286.22 ± 2.2719.6
‘Freedom’FRMUSA12.41 ± 0.917.18 ± 1.6317.3
‘Gerlinde’GERGermany12.75 ± 1.187.12 ± 2.6117.9
‘Gold Milenium’GOMPoland13.28 ± 0.194.43 ± 1.1130.0
‘Gold Star’GSCzech Republic11.62 ± 0.624.78 ± 1.1624.3
‘Medea’MDAPoland12.52 ± 0.686.01 ± 2.8320.8
‘Melfree’MELPoland13.34 ± 0.965.76 ± 1.8023.2
‘Novamac’NOMCanada11.79 ± 0.607.19 ± 0.3416.4
‘Rajka’RAJCzech Republic13.00 ± 1.565.59 ± 1.4823.3
‘Rebella’RBLGermany12.91 ± 1.507.73 ± 2.4516.7
‘Regine’RGNGermany13.90 ± 1.138.26 ± 2.0216.8
‘Reglindis’REGGermany12.67 ± 0.7811.07 ± 2.1711.4
‘Renora’RNRGermany13.24 ± 0.679.25 ± 1.3014.3
‘Retina’RETGermany12.45 ± 0.824.77 ± 1.7626.1
‘Rewena’REWGermany12.59 ± 0.809.22 ± 2.4613.7
‘Rosana’ROSCzech Republic11.54 ± 0.667.84 ± 2.7414.7
‘Rubinola’RBNCzech Republic13.36 ± 1.006.1 ± 0.7021.9
‘Sawa’SAWPoland13.07 ± 0.477.41 ± 1.5717.6
‘Selena’SELCzech Republic11.28 ± 0.733.94 ± 1.4228.6
‘Topaz’TOPCzech Republic13.82 ± 0.627.81 ± 2.0417.7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/johr-2021-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2353-3978 | Journal ISSN: 2300-5009
Language: English
Page range: 23 - 34
Submitted on: Jun 1, 2020
Accepted on: Feb 1, 2021
Published on: Apr 14, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Monika Mieszczakowska-Frąc, Witold Płocharski, Dorota Kruczyńska, Jarosław Markowski, published by National Institute of Horticultural Research
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.