Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Morphological and molecular characterization of Paractinolaimus uljinensis n. sp. (Nematoda: Actinolaimidae) from Korea, with an updated compendium of the genus

Open Access
|Oct 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Line drawings of Paractinolaimus uljinensis n. sp. (A–G): A: Female whole body; B: Male whole body; C: Female reproductive system; D: Female anterior region; E: Female rectum and prerectum region; F: Female tail; G: The expanded part of pharynx (the glandularium).
Line drawings of Paractinolaimus uljinensis n. sp. (A–G): A: Female whole body; B: Male whole body; C: Female reproductive system; D: Female anterior region; E: Female rectum and prerectum region; F: Female tail; G: The expanded part of pharynx (the glandularium).

Figure 2:

Line drawings of Paractinolaimus uljinensis n. sp. (A–K): A: Posterior region of male, including copulatory apparatus, the arrangement of ventromedian supplements and copulatory hump. (Arrows indicate the position of submedian papillae); B: Male tail region; C: Lateral guiding piece; D, E, F: Variation in shape and arrangement of pre/postvulval papillae; G, J, K: Variation in shape of cardia and basal shield; H: Head region; I: Junction between intestine and prerectum with a conical or tongue-like structure.
Line drawings of Paractinolaimus uljinensis n. sp. (A–K): A: Posterior region of male, including copulatory apparatus, the arrangement of ventromedian supplements and copulatory hump. (Arrows indicate the position of submedian papillae); B: Male tail region; C: Lateral guiding piece; D, E, F: Variation in shape and arrangement of pre/postvulval papillae; G, J, K: Variation in shape of cardia and basal shield; H: Head region; I: Junction between intestine and prerectum with a conical or tongue-like structure.

Figure 3:

Photomicrographs of Paractinolaimus uljinensis n. sp. (A–G). A: Female anterior region; B: Posterior region of male, including copulatory apparatus and the arrangement of ventromedian supplements; C: Region of copulatory hump; D: Anterior and middle part of female tail; E: Whole female tail; F: Vulval region with pre/postvulval papillae conformation; G: Female posterior region, including the prerectum and rectum. (Scale bars: A, B, C, F, and G = 30 μm; D = 50 μm; E = 100 μm).
Photomicrographs of Paractinolaimus uljinensis n. sp. (A–G). A: Female anterior region; B: Posterior region of male, including copulatory apparatus and the arrangement of ventromedian supplements; C: Region of copulatory hump; D: Anterior and middle part of female tail; E: Whole female tail; F: Vulval region with pre/postvulval papillae conformation; G: Female posterior region, including the prerectum and rectum. (Scale bars: A, B, C, F, and G = 30 μm; D = 50 μm; E = 100 μm).

Figure 4:

Photomicrographs of Paractinolaimus uljinensis n. sp. (A–K). A, B, C: Variation in female anterior region; D: Shape of cardia and basal shield; E: Junction between intestine and prerectum with a conical or tongue-like structure; F: Region of copulatory hump; G, H: Variation in shape and configuration of advulval papillae; I, J: Variation in shape of male tail; K: Posteriormost part of female tail. (Scale bars: A, D–K = 20 μm; B, C = 10 μm).
Photomicrographs of Paractinolaimus uljinensis n. sp. (A–K). A, B, C: Variation in female anterior region; D: Shape of cardia and basal shield; E: Junction between intestine and prerectum with a conical or tongue-like structure; F: Region of copulatory hump; G, H: Variation in shape and configuration of advulval papillae; I, J: Variation in shape of male tail; K: Posteriormost part of female tail. (Scale bars: A, D–K = 20 μm; B, C = 10 μm).

Figure 5:

Bayesian tree inferred under the GTR + I + G model from 18S-rRNA gene sequences of Dorylaimid species. Posterior probability values exceeding 50% are given on appropriate clades. The studied population is indicated in bold text. Outgroup taxa: Paravulvus hartingii and Nygolaimus cf. parvus.
Bayesian tree inferred under the GTR + I + G model from 18S-rRNA gene sequences of Dorylaimid species. Posterior probability values exceeding 50% are given on appropriate clades. The studied population is indicated in bold text. Outgroup taxa: Paravulvus hartingii and Nygolaimus cf. parvus.

Figure 6:

Bayesian tree inferred under the GTR + I + G model from LSU D2-D3 partial sequences of Dorylaimid species. Posterior probability values exceeding 50% are given on appropriate clades. The studied population is indicated in bold text. Outgroup taxa: Mononchus tunbridgensis and Anatonchus tridentatus.
Bayesian tree inferred under the GTR + I + G model from LSU D2-D3 partial sequences of Dorylaimid species. Posterior probability values exceeding 50% are given on appropriate clades. The studied population is indicated in bold text. Outgroup taxa: Mononchus tunbridgensis and Anatonchus tridentatus.

Main morphometric characters of Paractinolaimus species (updated from Vinciguerra et al_ (2013))_ Measurements in μm, except L in mm_ (* measurements obtained from original drawings)_

SpeciesSexLacc’VOdont.Pre/postvul. papillaeSpic.Ventr. suppl.Reference
acutus2.1–2.436–4310–1210–1244–4625–271, 2 Khan and Park (1999)
aruprus2.25–2.4030–3288.145–4823–26none Khan et al. (1994)
baldus2.646118.7*5227none Thorne (1967)
2.949840.7* 27 10–11
cattienus2.38–2.4340–518.2–10.19.6–12.747.8–48.618–19none Gusakov and Gagarin (2015)
2.22391480.6 19 4812
chandicus2.1–2.344–5414–175*51–5227–29none Khan and Jairajpuri (1994)
2.143880.9* 27 6011
chiki2.6–2.963–6415–176.5–6.848–4920–21none Dhanam et al. (1994)
decraemerae2.8–3.236–4813–165.5–6.746–5125–291, 1 Pedram et al. (2010)
2.132680.6 27 7616
dhanachandi1.937106.75223 Khan and Jairajpuri (1994)
elongatus3.1–3.462–6516–175.3–5.549–5331–33none Khan and Jairajpuri (1994)
3–3.156–68116–1180.6–0.7 31–33 58–6218–21
filipjevi3.3436.812.1*4535 Schneider (1935)
girini2–2.328–2918.7–22.4354–5624 Sukul (1967)
2.12871 24 13
indicus1.5–1.931–3715–371.4–5.553–5620–22none Khan and Ganguly (1988)
intermedius2.5–2.836–5313–176–746–5427present Altherr (1968)
2.6–3.636–6070–115 63–6514–19
ishibashi3.0–3.351–558.3–9.96.2–6.849–5227–281, 1 Khan et al. (2008)
longidrilus3–3.735–4510–145.3–7.146–5032–331–2, 1–2 Eveleigh (1982)
3.546910.8 33 8319
macrolaimus4.55011.547 none de Man (1880)
3.75085 16–24
3.1–3.340–4211.1–11.8 46–51 none Loof (1961)
2.7–4.342–609.0–148–1244–5027–30present Andrássy (2009)
2.5–3.746–5790–120 27–30 16–19
magistris1.93451–531–1.153–5428–30none Vinciguerra et al. (2013)
2–2.342–4560–760.8 31–35 53–6014–15
micoletzkyi1.929242.35428none Coomans et al. (1990)
2.440820.7 29 6911
microdentatus3.4–3.543–5312–147.6–8.551–5331–35none Andrássy (1964)
2.9–3.438–5996–100 31–35 67–7018–24
occalescens2.637106*51 Schneider (1937)
1.927640.8 9
pachydermis2.133–347.6–88–8.544–4526–270, 1 Khan and Araki (2001)
parietinus1.8–2.427–389.0–145.8*49–5425none Eroshenko (1977)
1.7–2.425–3450–74 7016
persicus2.3–2.632–35.511.7–16.93.3–5.947.6–51.625–28none Panahi et al. (2019)
2.1–2.6840.388.30.7 28–29 71–75.517–18
rafiqi4.4–5.372–8920–274.4–6.550–5233–352–3, 2–3 Khan and Jairajpuri (1998)
5.0–5.285–87198–2090.9* 32–33 60*21
robustus3431111*5023none Thorne (1967)
2.84771 23 10
sahandi3.5–4.774–8816–224.5–7.547–5427–321–4, 1–3 Pedram et al. (2011)
3.2–4.470–93116–1660.6–0.7 27–31 62–8115–17
shamimi1.4–1.546–523.7–4.219–2041–4212–15none Gantait et al. (2006)
spanithelus2.8–3.935–5313–185.0–6.345–4929–330, 0–1 Eveleigh (1982)
3.436761 30 6712
tuberculatus2.3–2.539–447.2–8.88.8–10.246–4724–28none Choi and Khan (2000)
1.9–2.234–3968–780.7* 24–27 66–6915–19
uljinensis n. sp.2.5–3.040.2–47.96.9–8.510.1–14.242.5–47.723.5–27.03–9, 3–9 This study
2.2–2.840.2–48.982.9–121.40.6–0.9 23.5–27.0 60–70.512–15
vigor23414 5328none Thorne (1967)
vulvapapillatus1.63496.964223, 3 Khan et al. (1994)
1.4–1.528–3257–630.8 19–20 42–459
xosorum1.6629183.2*5213 Heyns and Argo (1969)

Morphometrics of Paractinolaimus uljinensis n_ sp_ from Korea_

CharacterHolotype ♀♀♀♂♂
n 3028
L2743.02764.0 ± 134.0 (2500.0–2980.0)2449.0 ± 170.0 (2183.0–2833.0)
a44.644.1 ± 2.1 (40.2–47.9)43.1 ± 2.4 (40.2–48.9)
b5.04.9 ± 0.2 (4.5–5.2)4.4 ± 0.3 (3.8–4.9)
c7.57.7 ± 0.4 (6.9–8.5)103.7 ± 9.4 (82.9–121.4)
c’12.211.7 ± 0.9 (10.1–14.2)0.7 ± 0.1 (0.6–0.9)
V45.645.5 ± 1.3 (42.5–47.7)_
G1%17.616.6 ± 1.6 (13.7–20.7)_
G2%18.017.9 ± 1.5 (14.6–21.5)_
Lip height7.57.6 ± 0.4 (7.0–8.5)7.6 ± 0.5 (7.0–8.5)
Lip diam.19.519.6 ± 0.6 (18.5–20.5)19.6 ± 0.5 (19.0–20.5)
Anterior to guiding ring19.519.2 ± 0.7 (17.5–20.5)19.0 ± 0.5 (17.5–20.0)
Odontostyle26.525.2 ± 1.0 (23.5–27.0)25.1 ± 0.8 (23.5–27.0)
Odontophore24.023.4 ± 0.9 (22.0–25.0)23.3 ± 0.8 (22.0–25.0)
Total spear50.548.5 ± 1.5 (45.5–51.0)48.3 ± 1.3 (46.5–52.0)
Anterior to nerve ring156.5158.7 ± 6.0 (147.0–173.0)158.7 ± 6.0 (146.0–172.0)
Pharynx length546.0562.4 ± 20.7 (502.0–598.0)562.9 ± 19.2 (518.0–597.0)
Glandularium length329.0341.9 ± 15.5 (307.5–368.0)348.1 ± 16.4 (313.5–384.5)
Cardia length22.024.7 ± 3.6 (17.5–30.5)24.5 ± 3.0 (19.0–29.5)
Maximum body diam.61.562.8 ± 3.1 (55.5–67.5)56.8 ± 2.0 (53.5–61.5)
Prerectum116.0122.9 ± 18.7 (86.5–169.5)200.3 ± 20.1 (174.0–246.5)
Rectum49.548.6 ± 5.2 (40.0–56.0)58.6 ± 2.5 (52.5–63.0)
Anal / cloacal body diam.30.031.0 ± 1.6 (26.5–33.0)33.1 ± 1.6 (30.0–36.0)
Tail length365.0361.3 ± 25.8 (324.0–435.0)23.8 ± 2.0 (21.0–29.0)
Spicules__64.5 ± 2.5 (60.0–70.5)
No. of ventromedian supplements__12–15
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2024-0040 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 23, 2024
Published on: Oct 23, 2024
Published by: Society of Nematologists, Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Abraham Okki Mwamula, Yi Seul Kim, Dong Woon Lee, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.