Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluation of fumigant and non-fumigant nematicides for management of Rotylenchulus reniformis on sweetpotato Cover

Evaluation of fumigant and non-fumigant nematicides for management of Rotylenchulus reniformis on sweetpotato

Open Access
|Jan 2023

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Nematicide active ingredients, application rates, application methods, and application timing for the sweetpotatoes field experiments conducted at LSU AgCenter Northeast Research Station in 2021 and 2022. DBP refers to days before planting.

ProductActive IngredientProduct Application RateApplication Rate (a.i.)Application MethodApplication Timing
Telone II1,3-dichloropropene74.8 L/ha84.9 kg/haShank21 DBP
VelumFluopyram500 ml/ha238 g/haIn-furrow2 DBP
VydateOxamyl18.7 L/ha4.28 kg/haIn-furrow2 DBP
SalibroFluazaindolizine2.24 L/ha1.12 kg/haIn-furrow2 DBP
AgLogicAldicarb16.8 kg/ha2.52 kg/haIn-furrow2 DBP
MajesteneBacterial metabolites18.7 L/ha-In-furrow2 DBP
NimitzFluensulfone8.18 L/ha3.92 kg/haIn-furrow2 DBP
Table 2.

2021 effect of soil treatment on the abundance of reniform nematode (Rotylenchulus reniformis) in soil planted with sweetpotato at the LSU AgCenter Northeast Research Station in 2021. Soil treatments sharing the same letter within a column do not differ significantly (P > 0.05), according to Tukey's HSD test.

Pre-FumAt PlantMid-SeasonHarvest
Control4,1251,188a5,575a5,875a
1,3-dichloropropene3,000188b350b1,963b
Fluopyram4,6251,750a1,825b2,575b
Oxamyl1,0001,438a888b3,148ab
Fluazaindolizine4,6251,500a3,170ab3,395ab
Aldicarb5,5001,063a1,950b2,200b
Majestene1,6251,250a2,468ab2,968ab
Fluensulfone3,5001,625a3,188ab3,438ab
P-value0.1930.014<0.0010.004
Table 3.

2022 effect of soil treatment on the abundance of reniform nematode (Rotylenchulus reniformis) in soil planted with sweetpotato at the LSU AgCenter Northeast Research Station in 2022. Soil treatments sharing the same letter within a column do not differ significantly (P > 0.05), according to Tukey's HSD test.

Pre-FumAt PlantMid-SeasonHarvest
Control1,4251,500a3,000ab5,300
1,3-dichloropropene1,000300b1,175b3,015
Fluopyram1,6501,250a1,500ab3,800
Oxamyl1,2751,425a2,600ab4,775
Fluazaindolizine975925ab3,150ab4,050
Aldicarb1,6751,275a1,525ab2,375
Majestene1,4001,125a3,500a4,325
Fluensulfone1,150975ab2,025ab4,400
P-value0.4320.0290.0080.529
Table 4.

2021 effect of soil treatment on the yield of US#1, canner, and jumbo grade sweetpotato harvest at the LSU AgCenter Northeast Research Station. Soil treatments sharing the same letter within a column do not differ significantly (P > 0.05), according to Tukey's HSD test.

U.S.#1CannerJumboTotal Marketable Yield
Control6.8ab7.40.114.2
1,3-dichloropropene9.2a6.51.016.7
Fluopyram8.9ab9.10.418.4
Oxamyl5.5b7.90.814.3
Fluazaindolizine6.2ab8.30.515.0
Aldicarb5.5b8.01.915.4
Majestene9.6a8.10.318.0
Fluensulfone7.0ab8.40.615.9
P-value0.0170.8920.4930.425
Table 5.

2022 effect of soil treatment on the yield of US#1, canner, and jumbo grade sweetpotato harvest at the LSU AgCenter Northeast Research Station. Soil treatments sharing the same letter within a column do not differ significantly (P > 0.05), according to Tukey's HSD test.

U.S.#1CannerJumboTotal Marketable Yield
Control7.4b3.41.812.6
1,3-dichloropropene9.7ab4.43.017.1
Fluopyram9.0ab3.71.013.6
Oxamyl12.0a2.80.715.5
Fluazaindolizine9.4ab3.63.516.5
Aldicarb11.1a3.71.716.5
Majestene9.2ab3.62.315.1
Fluensulfone5.3b3.32.310.9
P-value0.0170.9080.3960.498
Table 6.

Effect of soil treatment and experimental repetition on the final abundanceof reniform nematode (Rotylenchulus reniformis) in soil and storage root weight of sweetpotato planted into potted field soil from the LSU AgCenter Northeast Research Station. Soil treatments sharing the same letter within a column do not differ significantly (P > 0.05), according to Tukey's HSD test.

FactorLevelRotylenchulus reniformis per 500 ml soilStorage Root Weight (g)
Soil TreatmentUntreated31,060a15.5b
Pasteurized3,515c19.0ab
Fluopyram15,790b18.7b
Oxamyl29,350ab17.6b
Fluazaindolizine15,540b18.1b
Aldicarb36,890a22.2ab
Majestene29,110ab30.6a
Fluensulfone29,400ab16.7a
Experiment118825b25.1a
235465a14.5b
P-valueSoil Treatment<0.0010.005
Experiment<0.001<0.001
Interaction0.1220.073
Table 7.

Effect of soil treatment and experimental repetition on the final abundance of reniform nematode (Rotylenchulus reniformis) in soil and storage root weight of sweetpotato planted into potted field soil from the LSU AgCenter Macon Ridge Research Station. Soil treatments sharing the same letter within a column do not differ significantly (P > 0.05), according to Tukey's HSD test.

FactorLevelRotylenchulus reniformis per 500 ml soilStorage Root Weight (g)
Soil TreatmentUntreated13,790a29.8
Pasteurized2,155c32.1
Fluopyram10,560ab21.8
Oxamyl8,340ab30.5
Fluazaindolizine10,295ab36.0
Aldicarb6,575b31.1
Majestene11,055ab30.7
Fluensulfone6,890b28.4
Experiment19,43532.0
28,02528.0
P-valueSoil Treatment0.0450.530
Experiment0.1360.188
Interaction0.7490.701
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0061 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 28, 2023
Published on: Jan 24, 2023
Published by: Society of Nematologists, Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Tristan T. Watson, Caleb S. Hamm, J. Cole Gregorie, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.