Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Meloidogyne spp. in Eucalypts - Reproduction and Damage to Seedling Growth Cover

Meloidogyne spp. in Eucalypts - Reproduction and Damage to Seedling Growth

Open Access
|Jan 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Effect of Meloidogyne enterolobii, M. incognita, and M. javanica on root system volume, mass, and length of Eucalyptus grandis seedlings grown in a greenhouse for six months. Values are the mean of 10 seedlings per nematode species. “*” denotes a significant difference relative to the control according to the Mann–Whitney test at 5% significance.

Figure 2:

Effect of Meloidogyne enterolobii, M. incognita, and M. javanica on root system length and volume of eucalypt seedlings grown in a greenhouse for six months. A) Eucalyptus saligna. B, C) hybrid E. grandis × E. urophylla. Values are the means of 10 seedlings per eucalypt species or hybrid, per nematode species. “*” denotes a significant difference relative to the control according to the Mann-Whitney test at 5% significance.

Table 1:

Reproduction factor and host status of Eucalyptus spp. and Corymbia citriodora to Meloidogyne enterolobii, M. incognita, and M. javanica, after cultivation in greenhouse for six months

SpeciesM. enterolobiiM. incognitaM. javanica
E. camaldulensis0.22a (R)b0.52 (R)1.04 (S)
E. cloeziana0.60 (R)0.46 (R)0.62 (R)
E. dunni0.50 (R)0.82 (R)0.74 (R)
E. grandis0.38 (R)0.62 (R)0.42 (R)
E. saligna0.94 (R)4.82 (S)3.44 (S)
E. grandis × E. urophylla1.72 (S)0.48 (R)2.46 (S)
C. citriodora0.94 (R)0.90 (R)0.54 (R)

a Values are the mean of 10 seedlings per eucalypt species or hybrid, per nematode species.

b R denotes resistance, and S denotes susceptibility according to the criteria of Oostenbrink (1966).

Supplementary Figure 1:

A) Eucalypt seedlings cultivated in a greenhouse for assessment of host status to and damage by Meloidogyne incognita, M. javanica, and M. enterolobii. B) Corymbia citriodora. C) Eucalyptus saligna. D) Hybrid E. grandis × E. urophylla. E) E. grandis. F) E. dunni. G) E. cloeziana. H) E. camaldulensis.

Supplementary Table 1:

Mean ± error of shoot height (SH), stem diameter (SD), dry mass of leaves (ML), root-system mass (RSM), root system volume (RSV), and root-system length (RSL) of seedlings of Eucalyptus spp. and Corymbia citriodora when inoculated with Meloidogyne enterolobii, M. incognita or M. javanica, and cultivated in a greenhouse for six months.

TreatmentsSH (cm)SD (mm)ML (g)RSM (g)RSV (cm3)RSL (cm)
Eucalyptus camaldulensis
Meloidogyne enterolobii37.40 ± 0.72a3.38 ± 0.100.76 ± 0.103.06 ± 0.444.0 ± 0.2521.4 ± 0.78
Meloidogyne incognita37.20 ± 0.793.62 ± 0.120.89 ± 0.112.99 ± 0.242.9 ± 0.3721.2 ± 0.84
Meloidogyne javanica34.50 ± 0.573.52 ± 0.110.89 ± 0.113.32 ± 0.312.8 ± 0.5520.20 ± 0.42
Control39.01 ± 0.883.39 ± 0.100.92 ± 0.143.06 ± 0.234.2 ± 0.4121.4 ± 0.55
Corymbia citriodora
Meloidogyne enterolobii33.30 ± 0.533.01 ± 0.070.81 ± 0.074.23 ± 0.154.0 ± 0.3320.0 ± 0.59
Meloidogyne incognita34.06 ± 0.423.03 ± 0.090.70 ± 0.112.53 ± 0.173.8 ± 0.3520.5 ± 0.22
Meloidogyne javanica30.60 ± 0.692.90 ± 0.080.69 ± 0.064.13 ± 0.193.1 ± 0.3120.0 ± 0.47
Control33.33 ± 0.533.26 ± 0.080.81 ± 0.074.15 ± 0.144.5 ± 0.3420.9 ± 0.48
Eucalyptus cloeziana
Meloidogyne enterolobii28.61 ± 0.933.26 ± 0.081.00 ± 0.142.98 ± 0.123.6 ± 0.5518.8 ± 0.28
Meloidogyne incognita27.90 ± 0.973.30 ± 0.111.10 ± 0.263.26 ± 0.223.4 ± 0.3919.2 ± 0.38
Meloidogyne javanica28.70 ± 0.973.25 ± 0.121.07 ± 0.144.98 ± 0.134.9 ± 0.5018.8 ± 0.32
Control32.50 ± 1.003.48 ± 0.091.26 ± 0.124.38 ± 0.143.8 ± 0.4719.2 ± 0.24
Eucalyptus dunni
Meloidogyne enterolobii38.51 ± 0.764.18 ± 0.141.2 ± 0.162.72 ± 0.423.6 ± 0.3818.8 ± 0.23
Meloidogyne incognita37.17 ± 0.844.24 ± 0.120.96 ± 0.153.45 ± 0.473.2 ± 0.3920.3 ± 0.38
Meloidogyne javanica41.00 ± 0.814.27 ± 0.131.0 ± 0.113.07 ± 0.493.0 ± 0.5118.8 ± 0.33
Control41.20 ± 0.704.12 ± 0.121.23 ± 0.114.99 ± 0.444.6 ± 0.3919.7 ± 0.39
Eucalyptus grandis
Meloidogyne enterolobii34.28 ± 0.783.44 ± 0.130.48 ± 0.072.89 ± 0.37*2.50 ± 0.40*19.3 ± 0.49*
Meloidogyne incognita36.78 ± 0.693.81 ± 0.100.83 ± 0.094.96 ± 0.643.40 ± 0.43*20.0 ± 0.29*
Meloidogyne javanica36.56 ± 0.783.97 ± 0.110.45 ± 0.053.08 ± 0.45*2.60 ± 0.39*19.8 ± 0.39*
Control36.52 ± 0.923.84 ± 0.120.60 ± 0.075.14 ± 0.784.40 ± 0.4921.5 ± 0.41
Eucalyptus saligna
Meloidogyne enterolobii24.13 ± 0.623.75 ± 0.111.3 ± 0.164.86 ± 0.942.3 ± 0.6119.0 ± 0.63*
Meloidogyne incognita24.18 ± 0.653.82 ± 0.111.37 ± 0.137.87 ± 1.233.9 ± 0.7620.8 ± 0.45*
Meloidogyne javanica24.85 ± 0.593.49 ± 0.101.05 ± 0.145.73 ± 1.132.4 ± 0.5720.3 ± 0.61*
Control27.52 ± 0.543.58 ± 0.531.25 ± 0.156.74 ± 1.083.1 ± 0.4922.5 ± 0.67
Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla
Meloidogyne enterolobii20.30 ± 0.893.60 ± 0.101.06 ± 0.093.43 ± 0.51.20 ± 0.13*20.3 ± 1.01*
Meloidogyne incognita20.60 ± 0.593.75 ± 0.101.07 ± 0.172.41 ± 0.441.30 ± 0.15*20.6 ± 0.63*
Meloidogyne javanica24.26 ± 0.584.19 ± 0.271.32 ± 0.153.16 ± 0.461.30 ± 0.19*24.2 ± 0.53
Control27.67 ± 0.843.54 ± 0.421.19 ± 0.163.74 ± 0.392.01 ± 0.2024.0 ± 0.66

a Values are the mean of 10 seedlings per eucalypt species or hybrid, per nematode species.

“*” Denotes a significant difference in relation to the control according to the Mann–Whitney test at 5% significance.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0059 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Submitted on: May 11, 2023
Published on: Jan 23, 2024
Published by: Society of Nematologists, Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 José Olívio Lopes Vieira, Renata Cunha Pereira, Mariana Zandomênico Mangeiro, Ricardo Moreira Souza, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.