Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Belonolaimus longicaudatus management using metam potassium and fluensulfone in potato Cover

Belonolaimus longicaudatus management using metam potassium and fluensulfone in potato

Open Access
|Jul 2023

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Chemistries and rates for nematicide treatments.

Treatment abbreviationProductActive ingredientLiters product/bedded haakg a.i./bedded haMethod
1. UTCUntreated controlNone---
2. MP-AMetam KLRbMetam potassium562390Fumigation
3. MP+FLMetam KLRMetam potassium562390Fumigation (tank mix)
NIMITZcFluensulfone7.03.36
4. FL-ANIMITZFluensulfone7.03.36Ground spray
5. 1,3-DTelone IId1,3-dichloropropene7588.3Fumigation

a Bedded acreage was 75% of broadcast acreage. In this trial, the bedded acreage was considered the acreage to which treatments were applied. Further details of treatment applications are described in the materials and methods.

b Metam KLR (Taminco, Allentown, PA)

c NIMITZ (ADAMA, Research Triangle Park, NC)

d Telone II (Dow Agrosciences LLC, Zionsville, IN)

Table 2.

Schedule for data collection and trial establishment. Numbers in parentheses are days before (negative) or after (positive) planting.

EventYear 1 (2019–2020)Year 2 (2020–2021)
Preplant soil sampling18 Dec (−38)14 Dec (−30)
Nematicide application2 Jan (−25)18 Dec (−26)
Beds tilled and re-formed13 Jan (−14)5 Jan (−8)
Planting27 Jan (0)13 Jan (0)
Stand count 126 Feb (30)18 Feb (36)
Stand count 24 Mar (37)26 Feb (44)
Vigor rating 126 Feb (30)18 Feb (36)
Vigor rating 24 Mar (37)26 Feb (44)
Vigor rating 318 Mar (52)3 Mar (50)
Vigor rating 412 Mar (59)
Midseason soil sampling4 Mar (37)26 Feb (44)
Harvest soil sampling8 May (103)14 Apr (92)
Harvest11 May (106)21 Apr (99)
Table 3.

Environmental conditions during the weeks before and after nematicide application for trials in 2019–2020 and 2020–2021

Time Perioda2019–20202020–2021
Temperature (°C)Temperature (°C)
RainfallbSoilcAirRainfallSoilAir
2 WBA7.5416.916.00.5316.312.0
1 WBA1.0218.618.30.6916.715.2
Day of application016.816.5014.97.3
1 WAA0.5316.414.02.5415.513.3
2 WAA0.0018.421.10.2514.313.9
3 WAA0.0017.013.10.2315.914.2
4 WAAd0.0316.113.20.2014.211.2
5 WAA1.4216.315.40.1313.311.3
6 WAA0.0817.317.52.5116.115.8
7 WAA0.8618.518.10.5113.411.1
8 WAA1.9317.114.06.7316.718.1
9 WAA0.2016.916.45.6618.217.7
10 WAA0.0817.317.52.5116.115.8

a WBA and WAA are weeks before nematicide application and weeks after nematicide application, respectively.

b Rainfall (cm) is total for the respective week or day of nematicide application.

c Temperatures are mean for the week or day.

d Potatoes were planted during 4 weeks after application, at 25 or 26 days after application in 2020 and 2021, respectively.

Figure 1:

Potato plant stand as affected by nematicide application in 2020 and 2021. Timing indicated in days after planting (DAP). Bars and brackets represent means (N=6) and standard errors, respectively. “UTC”, “MP-A”, “MP+FL”, “FL-A”, and “1,3-D” represent untreated control, metam potassium alone, metam potassium mixed with fluensulfone, fluensulfone alone, and 1,3-dichloropropene nematicide treatments, respectively. Within each subfigure, means with different letters are significantly different (Fisher’s protected LSD, α=0.05).

Figure 2:

Potato plant vigor and phytotoxicity during production 2020 as affected by nematicide application. Timing indicated in days after planting (DAP). Plant vigor is a visual rating on a 0–100 scale with 100 best. Bars and brackets represent means (N=6) and standard errors, respectively. “UTC”, “MP-A”, “MP+FL”, “FL-A”, and “1,3-D” represent untreated control, metam potassium alone, metam potassium mixed with fluensulfone, fluensulfone alone, and 1,3-dichloropropene nematicide treatments, respectively. Within each subfigure, means with different letters are significantly different (Fisher’s protected LSD, α=0.05).

Figure 3:

Reduced stand and plant vigor in metam+fluensulfone treatment (right) compared with untreated control (left) at 36 days after planting in 2020.

Figure 4:

Symptoms of phytotoxicity on emerging potato shoots in treatments with metam potassium alone or in combination with fluensulfone at 36 days after planting in 2020. There is browning at tips of shoots and leaf unfolding is delayed.

Figure 5:

Potato plant vigor during production in 2021 as affected by nematicide application. Timing indicated in days after planting (DAP). Plant vigor is a visual rating on a 0–100 scale with 100 best. Bars and brackets represent means (N=6) and standard errors, respectively. “UTC”, “MP-A”, “MP+FL”, “FL-A”, and “1,3-D” represent untreated control, metam potassium alone, metam potassium mixed with fluensulfone, fluensulfone alone, and 1,3-dichloropropene nematicide treatments, respectively. Within each subfigure, means with different letters are significantly different (Fisher’s protected LSD, α=0.05).

Figure 6:

Marketable and total yield as affected by nematicide application in 2020 and 2021. Marketable yield is USDA size A tubers without defects. Total yield includes marketable yield and culls due to size or quality. Bars and brackets represent means (N=6) and standard errors, respectively. “UTC”, “MP-A”, “MP+FL”, “FL-A”, and “1,3-D” represent untreated control, metam potassium alone, metam potassium mixed with fluensulfone, fluensulfone alone, and 1,3-dichloropropene nematicide treatments, respectively. Within each subfigure, means with different letters are significantly different (Fisher’s protected LSD, α=0.05).

Table 4.

Potato tuber yield (kg/ha) by grade and nematicide treatment.a

GradeCbBA1A2A3Size cullsc
Nematicide Treatment2020
Untreated control8051,4084,965 b, c13,243 b, c4512,213
Metam potassium6378493,904 c10,613 c3031,486
Metam+Fluensulfone8391,1476,014 a, b, c14,429 a, b, c4681,986
Fluensulfone7731,8327,954 a, b17,112 a, b5472,606
1,3-dichlorpropene1,0391,9698,948 a18,884 a543,008
Nematicide Treatment2021
Untreated control1,394 a, b1,914 b6,9347,782 c03,308 b
Metam potassium1,267 b1,940 b7,26611,596 a03,208 b
Metam+Fluensulfone1,145 b1,763 b6,8459,066 b, c02,908 b
Fluensulfone1,272 b1,998 b6,7297,577 c03,270 b
1,3-dichlorpropene1,585 a2,511 a7,64510,886 a, b04,095 a

a Different letters in the same column indicate significantly different means based on Fisher’s protected LSD at α = 0.05.

b Tuber grades of C, B, A1, A2, and A3 include harvest potatoes with diameters of 1.3–3.7, 3.8–4.7, 4.8–6.3, 6.4–8.3, and 8.4–10.2 cm respectively. Grades A1, A2, and A3 are considered marketable.

c Size culls include grade C and B tubers

Table 5.

Weight (kg/ha) of tubers culled due to quality defects by category in 2021 season.a

Nematicide TreatmentRottedGreenGrowth crackMisshapenTotal quality cullsbGrand total cullsc
Untreated control469 a, b72 c4433051,2894,598 b
Metam potassium237 b, c457 a5752911,5614,768 b
Metam+Fluensulfone291 a, b, c299 a, b335419673,874 c
Fluensulfone145 c65 c9411681,3194,590 b
1,3-dichlorpropene545 a74 b, c1,127371,7825,877 a

a Different letters in the same column indicate significantly different means based on Fisher’s protected LSD at α = 0.05. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, tuber defect culls were not measured in 2020

b Total quality culls is the sum of tubers in the rotted, green, growth crack, and misshapen categories.

c Grand total culls is the sum of size and quality culls.

Figure 7:

Sting nematode soil population densities at preplant (before fumigation), midseason (37 to 44 days after planting), and harvest in 2020 and 2021 as affected by nematicide treatments. Bars and brackets represent means (N=6) and standard errors, respectively. “UTC”, “MP-A”, “MP+FL”, “FL-A”, and “1,3-D” represent untreated control, metam potassium alone, metam potassium mixed with fluensulfone, fluensulfone alone, and 1,3-dichloropropene nematicide treatments, respectively. Within each subfigure, means with different letters are significantly different (Fisher’s protected LSD, α=0.05). effects for a given season (ANOVA, P < 0.05).

Figure 8:

Stunt nematode soil population densities at preplant (before fumigation), midseason (37 to 44 days after planting), and harvest in 2020 and 2021 as affected by nematicide treatments. Bars and brackets represent means (N=6) and standard errors, respectively. “UTC”, “MP-A”, “MP+FL”, “FL-A”, and “1,3-D” represent untreated control, metam potassium alone, metam potassium mixed with fluensulfone, fluensulfone alone, and 1,3-dichloropropene nematicide treatments, respectively. Within each subfigure, means with different letters are significantly different (Fisher’s protected LSD, α=0.05).

Figure 9:

Free-living nematode soil population densities at preplant (before fumigation), midseason (37 to 44 days after planting), and harvest in 2020 and 2021 as affected by nematicide treatments. Bars and brackets represent means (N=6) and standard errors, respectively. “UTC”, “MP-A”, “MP+FL”, “FL-A”, and “1,3-D” represent untreated control, metam potassium alone, metam potassium mixed with fluensulfone, fluensulfone alone, and 1,3-dichloropropene nematicide treatments, respectively. Within each subfigure, means with different letters are significantly different (Fisher’s protected LSD, α=0.05).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0028 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 23, 2023
Published on: Jul 6, 2023
Published by: Society of Nematologists, Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Zane J. Grabau, Chang Liu, Pablo A. Navia Gine, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.