Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Diplogasteroides sp., a Cryptic Population of the Haslacheri Group (Diplogastridae), and Parasitorhabditis terebranus (Rhabditidae) from Korea Cover

Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Diplogasteroides sp., a Cryptic Population of the Haslacheri Group (Diplogastridae), and Parasitorhabditis terebranus (Rhabditidae) from Korea

Open Access
|May 2023

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Photomicrographs of Diplogasteroides sp. (A-C, F, and G) and Parasitorhabditis terebranus (D, E, and H-J). Diplogasteroides sp. A, B: Variation in female anterior body region; C: Female tail; F and G: Variation in male tail and copulatory apparatus shape. Parasitorhabditis terebranus D, E, and H: Variation in female anterior body region; I: Male tail with copulatory apparatus; J: Female tail; (Scale bars: A-J = 10 μm).

Figure 2:

Illustrations of Diplogasteroides sp. (A-H): A: Female whole body; B: Male whole body; C: Male tail region including copulatory apparatus and the arrangement of genital papillae; D-F: Variation in shape of gubernaculum; G: Female tail region; H: Female anterior region, including the shape of pharynx. Abbreviations: Genital papillae arrangement from ventral side (v + number); lateral/dorsal sides (v3d; ad; pd); phasmid (ph); and deirid (d).

Table 1.

Comparison of morphometries of Diplogasteroides sp. and Parasitorhabditis terebranus from Korea with topotype populations.a

CharacterDiplogasteroides sp.D. haslacheriParasitorhabditis terebranus
Korea (Current study)Rühm (1956), and Kanzaki et al. (2002)Korea (Current study)USA (Massey, 1974)
♀♀♂♂♀♀b♂♂♀♀♂♂♀♀♂♂
N2020??2020??
L1061,3±106.9
(855.3-1258.3)
909.O±82.8
(777.6-1068.1)
825-1005750-825109δ.4±78.6
(922.4-1244.4)
1015.8±96.9
(841.0-1195.6)
770-810750
A29.4±2.1
(25.1-32.3)
29.2±0.8
(27.7-30.5)
26.126.2-26.826.4±2.9
(20.5-30.0)
26.0±2.2
(21.1-29.4)
19.7-20.119.5
B6.2±0.5
(5.4-7.5)
5.8±0.4
(5.2-6.3)
5.6-6.15.1-5.25.5±0.4
(4.6-6.1)
5.2±0.4
(4.6-6.1)
4.2-4.34.1
C11.7±0.8
(9.8-13.1)
I4.9±0.9
(13.2-16.2)
9.4-9.612.4-15.327.1±2.2
(22.8-30.2)
27.4±2.3
(22.1-30.5)
26.2-27.327.3
c’4.2±0.3
(3.5-4.7)
2.5±0.2
(2.2-2.9)
5.02.41.9±0.2
(1.6-2.1)
1.7±0.1
(1.4-1.9)
--
V51.6±1.1
(50.3-53.2)
-50.3-52.3-93.3±0.5
(91.9-93.9)
-93-
Lip height----3.3±0.1
(3.0-3.6)
3.1 ±0.2
(2.8-3.5)
--
Lip diameter11.9±0.5
(10.6-12.6)
11.9±0.6
(11.0-12.6)
--12.6±0.7
(11.6-14.0)
12.1 ±0.7
(11.0-13.5)
--
Stoma11.1±0.8
(9.8-12.3)
11.0±0.7
(9.0-11.8)
--20.9±1.4
(18.5-23.0)
20.3±1.1
(18.0-22.0)
21-
Anterior to median bulb valve98.2±6.3
(87.6-112.7)
90.4±5.3
(82.4-102.2)
--107.2±7.4
(95.8-120.2)
101,4±5.1
(93.3-112.9)
--
Excretory pore1340±8.3
(123.0-155.4)
126.8±5.7
(114.8-138.0)
--1540±8.7
(135.0-162.7)
153.6±8.6
(136.0-164.0)
--
Pharynx length171.4±11.9
(154.1-194.2)
156.3±8.6
(145.0-170.0)
--201.0±9.3 (191.3-223.0)194.3±8.1
(181.3-208.5)
--
Maximum body diameter36.2±3.5
(29.0-42.1)
31.7±3.0
(27.4-37.7)
--41.9±4.7
(36.0-51.5)
39.1±2.7
(33.3-43.0)
--
Vulval body diameter38.1±3.6
(33.6-43.6)
---35.2±2.9
(30.8-42.6)
---
Vulva to anus length----32.5±2.6
(28.0-38.0)
---
Vulva to tail tip----73.1±3.5
(64.0-77.9)
---
Anal / cloacal body diameter21.5±1.4
(19.2-24.8)
24.2±1.6
(22.0-27.0)
--21.4±1.5
(18.9-24.5)
21.8±1.6
(19.8-24.9)
--
Tail length90.5±9.5
(73.0-104.6)
60.8±4.6
(50.0-69.5)
--40.6±3.0
(36.0-45.8)
37.0±2.5
(31.5-41.0)
--
Spicules-35.5±2.1
(30.0-38.0)
-27-30-36.6±1.7
(33.0-38.6)
-34
Gubernaculum-17.9±1.5
(15.7-21.0)
-15-17-16.5±0.6
(15.2-18.0)
-17
Tail spike length-19.1 ±2.3
(16.0-23.4)
------

[i] aAII measurements are in micrometers and in the form mean ± standard deviation (range).

[ii] bDip¦ogasteroides has¦acheri and Parasitorhabditis terebranus topotype populations.

Figure 3:

Illustrations of Parasitorhabditis terebranus (A-G): A: Male whole body; B: Female whole body; C: Female anterior region; D and F: Female tail region including variation in vulval lip shape; E: Male tail in right lateral view, with arrangement of bursal rays; G: Male tail in ventral view, with arrangement of bursal rays.

Figure 4:

Bayesian tree inferred under the GTR + I + G model from I8S-rRNA sequences of Diplogasteroides spp., Parasitorhabditis spp., and other closely related species from other genera. Posterior probability values exceeding 50% are given on appropriate clades. The studied population is indicated in bold. Outgroup taxon: Rhabditoides inermiformis and Leptolaimus donsi.

Figure 5:

Bayesian tree inferred under the GTR + I + G model from D2-D3 expansion segment of 28S-rRNA partial sequences of Diplogasteroides spp., Parasitorhabditis spp., and other closely related species from other genera. Posterior probability values exceeding 50% are given on appropriate clades. The studied population is indicated in bold. Outgroup taxon: Rhabditoides regina.

Figure 6:

Bayesian tree inferred under the GTR + I + G model from COI partial sequences of Diplogasteroides spp., Parasitorhabditis spp., and members of closely related genera. Posterior probability values exceeding 50% are given on appropriate clades. The studied population is indicated in bold. Outgroup taxon: Ascaridia columbae.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 29, 2023
Published on: May 23, 2023
Published by: Society of Nematologists, Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Abraham Okki Mwamula, Sang Myeong Lee, Young Hak Jung, Ho-wook Lee, Yi Seul Kim, Young Ho Kim, Dong Woon Lee, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.