Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Meloidogyne incognita Management Using Fumigant and Non-fumigant Nematicides on Sweet Potato Cover

Meloidogyne incognita Management Using Fumigant and Non-fumigant Nematicides on Sweet Potato

By: Chang Liu and  Zane Grabau  
Open Access
|Jul 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Nematicide effects on Meloidogyne incognita J2 soil abundances at preplant, midseason, and harvest in 2018 trials. Within each subfigure, means with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) based on Fisher’s protected LSD. “Fluaz. 1.12” and “Fluaz. 2.24” indicate fluazaindolizine at 1.12 kg a.i./ha and 2.24 kg a.i./ha, respectively. “Fluop.” Indicates fluopyram.

Figure 2

Nematicide effects on Meloidogyne incognita J2 soil abundances at preplant, midseason, and harvest in 2019 trials. Within each subfigure, means with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) based on Fisher’s protected LSD. “Fluaz. 1.12” and “Fluaz. 2.24” indicate fluazaindolizine at 1.12 kg a.i./ha and 2.24 kg a.i./ha, respectively. “Fluop.” Indicates fluopyram.

Figure 3

Nematicide effects on Meloidogyne incognita J2 soil abundances at preplant, midseason, and harvest in 2020 trials. Within each subfigure, means with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) based on Fisher’s protected LSD. “Fluaz. 1.12” and “Fluaz. 2.24” indicate fluazaindolizine at 1.12 kg a.i./ha and 2.24 kg a.i./ha, respectively. “Fluop.” Indicates fluopyram.

Figure 4

Nematicide effects on free-living nematode soil abundances at preplant, midseason, and harvest in 2018 trial. Within each subfigure, means with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) based on Fisher’s protected LSD. “Fluaz. 1.12” and “Fluaz. 2.24” indicate fluazaindolizine at 1.12 kg a.i./ha and 2.24 kg a.i./ha, respectively. “Fluop.” Indicates fluopyram.

Figure 5

Nematicide effects on free-living nematode soil abundances at preplant, midseason, and harvest in 2019 trial. Within each subfigure, means with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) based on Fisher’s protected LSD. “Fluaz. 1.12” and “Fluaz. 2.24” indicate fluazaindolizine at 1.12 kg a.i./ha and 2.24 kg a.i./ha, respectively. “Fluop.” Indicates fluopyram.

Figure 6

Nematicide effects on free-living nematode soil abundances at preplant, midseason, and harvest in 2020 trial. Within each subfigure, means with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) based on Fisher’s protected LSD. “Fluaz. 1.12” and “Fluaz. 2.24” indicate fluazaindolizine at 1.12 kg a.i./ha and 2.24 kg a.i./ha, respectively. “Fluop.” Indicates fluopyram.

Figure 7

Nematicide effects on total sweet potato tuber yield in 2018, 2019, and 2020 trials. Within each subfigure, means with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) based on Fisher’s protected LSD. “Fluaz. 1.12” and “Fluaz. 2.24” indicate fluazaindolizine at 1.12 kg a.i./ha and 2.24 kg a.i./ha, respectively. “Fluop.” Indicates fluopyram.

Figure 8

Nematicide effects on marketable sweet potato tuber yield in 2018, 2019, and 2020 trials. Within each subfigure, means with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) based on Fisher’s protected LSD. “Fluaz. 1.12” and “Fluaz. 2.24” indicate fluazaindolizine at 1.12 kg a.i./ha and 2.24 kg a.i./ha, respectively. “Fluop.” Indicates fluopyram.

Schedule for data collection and trial maintenance in 2018–2020_

Task201820192020
Preplant soil sampleMay 16 (37 DBP)aMay 4 (40 DBP)May 18 (24 DBP)
FumigationMay 22 (31 DBP)May 13 (31 DBP)May 22 (20 DBP)
Nematicide broadcast spray applicationsbJune 11 (11 DBP)June 4 (9 DBP)June 3 (8 DBP)
Sweet potato plantedJune 22June 13June 11
Midseason soil sampleAugust 23 (64 DAP)August 16 (64 DAP)August 3 (53 DAP)
Harvest soil sampleOctober 4 (106 DAP)October 31 (139 DAP)November 6 (149 DAP)
Sweet potato harvestOctober 23 (127 DAP)November 1 (140 DAP)November 11 (154 DAP)

Sweet potato tuber yield (Mg/ha) by grade category and tuber gall rating as affected by nematicide treatments in 2019 and 2020_a

TreatmentUSDA 1 (Mg/ha)bUSDA 2 (Mg/ha)Defects (Mg/ha)Size outliers (Mg/ha)Percent defectscTuber galling (%)d
2019
Control1.03 b2.3116.20.47 b840.41
Fluazaindolizine2.76 ab2.6016.290.87 ab741.06
1.12 kg/ha
Fluazaindolizine2.40 b4.8417.560.94 ab680.03
2.24 kg/ha
Fluazaindolizine4.46 a4.7016.822.49 a600.21
1.12 kg/ha + oxamyl
1,3-D1.59 b4.1720.990.85 ab760.67
Fluopyram0.85 b4.3016.061.03 ab731.14
Oxamyl2.51 b4.9714.920.27 b670.57
2020
Control1.73 b1.93 b11.020.2773 a7.14 ab
Fluazaindolizine1.57 b2.80 b13.710.2575 a8.51 a
1.12 kg/ha
Fluazaindolizine1.84 b2.24 b12.840.3476 a6.18 ab
2.24 kg/ha
Fluazaindolizine1.99 b2.62 b11.450.2969 ab8.22 a
1.12 kg/ha + oxamyl
1,3-D7.64 a8.33 a20.160.2055 b0.60 c
Fluopyram1.84 b2.04 b17.030.2781 a3.93 bc
Oxamyl1.99 b1.86 b13.350.2778 a6.50 ab

Nematicide application treatment rates and application methods in 2018–2020 trials_

TreatmentProductActive ingredientProduct application rateApplication rate (a.i.)Application method
1Untreated control
2SalibroaFluazaindolizine2.24 L/ha1.12 kg/haBroadcast spray
3SalibroFluazaindolizine4.48 L/ha2.24 kg/haBroadcast spray
4Salibro + Vydate LbFluazaindolizine + oxamyl2.24 L/ha + 9.35 L/ ha1.12 kg/ha + 2.14 kg/haBroadcast spray
5Telone IIb1,3-D74 L/ha84 kg/haBroadcast shank fumigation
6Velum PrimecFluopyram499 mL/ha238 g/haBroadcast spray (2018–2019) Drench (2020)
7Vydate LOxamyl9.35 L/ha2.14 kg/haBroadcast spray
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2022-0026 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 14, 2022
|
Published on: Jul 29, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Chang Liu, Zane Grabau, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.