Have a personal or library account? Click to login
What is the Optimal Way to Assess Meloidogyne spp. Reproduction in Greenhouse Pot Experiments? Cover

What is the Optimal Way to Assess Meloidogyne spp. Reproduction in Greenhouse Pot Experiments?

Open Access
|May 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Meloidogyne incognita reproduction factor (RF = initial density/final density) on tomato as influenced by life stage, inoculation density, and/or pot size. Letters of significance were determined using the Tukey ad-hoc test of treatments. (A) Reproduction factor values by pot size. Darkening shade of the bars delineates the increasing pot size from 100 g to 3,000 g. (B) Reproduction factor values by life stage and inoculation density, regardless of pot size.
Meloidogyne incognita reproduction factor (RF = initial density/final density) on tomato as influenced by life stage, inoculation density, and/or pot size. Letters of significance were determined using the Tukey ad-hoc test of treatments. (A) Reproduction factor values by pot size. Darkening shade of the bars delineates the increasing pot size from 100 g to 3,000 g. (B) Reproduction factor values by life stage and inoculation density, regardless of pot size.

Figure 2

Meloidogyne incognita reproduction factor (initial density/final density) on tomato over time when inoculated with J2 or eggs. Letters of significance were determined using the Tukey ad-hoc test of treatments.
Meloidogyne incognita reproduction factor (initial density/final density) on tomato over time when inoculated with J2 or eggs. Letters of significance were determined using the Tukey ad-hoc test of treatments.

Figure 3

Reproduction factor (initial density/final density) values of three Meloidogyne species over time on tomato. Letters of significance were determined using the Tukey ad-hoc test of treatments. (A) M. hapla, (B) M. incognita, and (C) M. chitwoodi.
Reproduction factor (initial density/final density) values of three Meloidogyne species over time on tomato. Letters of significance were determined using the Tukey ad-hoc test of treatments. (A) M. hapla, (B) M. incognita, and (C) M. chitwoodi.

Summary of experiments and the variables assessed_

Variables assessed
Life stageaTakedown wkbPot size (g)Inoculation densitycSpecies
Experiment 1Eggs, J28100, 500, 3,0000.5, 1, 2M. incognita
Experiment 2Eggs, J25, 6, 7, 85001M. incognita
Experiment 3Eggs5, 6, 7, 85001M. chitwoodi, M. hapla, M. incognita

Summary of previous Meloidogyne species reproduction assay studies_

StudySpeciesPot sizeaInoculation densitybAssay duration (degree day or time)Experimental temperatureReproduction factor or Gall ratingc
Pinkerton et al. (1991)M. chitwoodi19 L150 eggs/250 cm31,750 DD21°C to 22°C20
Pinkerton et al. (1991)M. chitwoodi19 L150 eggs/250 cm32,000 DD21°C to 22°C120
Ferris et al. (1993)M. chitwoodi473 mL1,275 J210 wkN/A16.07
Ferris et al. (1993)M. chitwoodi473 mL1,000 J290 dN/A2.6–16.5
Mojtahedi et al. (1988)M. chitwoodi and M. hapla10 cm d5,000 eggs55 d22°C to 28°C47.3
Santo and O’Bannon (1981)M. chitwoodi and M. hapla18 cm d1,000 or 10,000 eggs13 wk15, 20, 25, and 30°CM. chitwoodi: (6.9–442.8) M. hapla: (0.45–34)
Gaspard et al. (1990)M. incognita172 cm3800 J2 to 1,500 J21 mon500 DD20-300.4
Gaspard et al. (1990)M. incognita172 cm3800 J2 to 1500 J23 mon500 DD20-300.4
Ploeg and Maris (1999)M. incognita1 L2,000 J2Varied16.2, 19.5, 25.0, 30.0, and 35.4°C.0.02–1.6
Singh and Khurma (2008)M. incognita2 L0, 200, 400, and 600 J28 wkN/A(avg # galls 13,19,26) (avg # egg masses 6, 11, and 17)
Silva et al. (2019)M. incognita2500 cm35,000 eggs8 wk25°C17.2
Cristóbal-Alejo et al. (2021)M. incognita5 kg2,500 eggs and 1,625 J292 d30 ± 2°C1700 eggs/g of root, 45 females per gram of root, 150 galls per plant
Yeon et al. (2021)M. incognita9.5 cm d10,000 eggs6 wk25 ± 5°C3.9 RF/9 gall index
Vega-Callo et al. (2021)M. incognita and M. hapla3 kg5,000 eggs and J26 mon25 ± 5°CM. incognita: (8.4) M. hapla (2.53)
Kankam and Adomako (2014)Meloidogyne spp.1 L500, 1,000, and 2,000 J212 wk23.4–34.5°C1.2–1.7
Wram and Zasada (2020)M. incognita, M. chitwoodi, and M. hapla 1,500 J215 wk26/18°C d/nightM. incognita: (61.2), M. chitwoodi: (25.5) M. hapla (32.2)
El-Sherif et al. (2007)M. incognita850 g250,500, and 1,000 eggs45 d23 ± 4°C1.1–1.5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2022-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 20, 2021
Published on: May 18, 2022
Published by: Society of Nematologists, Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Olivia Filialuna, Catherine Wram, Inga Zasada, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.