Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessing the consistency between the anthropometric method and bioelectrical impedance analysis when calculating the Heath-Carter somatotype in people without obesity: a cross-sectional study Cover

Assessing the consistency between the anthropometric method and bioelectrical impedance analysis when calculating the Heath-Carter somatotype in people without obesity: a cross-sectional study

Open Access
|Aug 2025

References

  1. Tuteljyan, V.A., Nikityuk, D.B. and Burlyaeva, E.A. (), The use of the method of complex anthropometry in sports and clinical practice: guidelines, 2018; Moscow: Sport, 64 p.
  2. Vybornaya K.V., Semenov M.M., Radzhabkadiev R.M., Korosteleva M.M., Nazarenko A.S., Nikityuk D.B. Otsenka sostava tela, somatotipolog icheskogo profilya i pokazateley osnovnogo obmena chlenov molodezhnoy sbornoy komandy Rossiyskoy Federatsii po akademicheskoy greble v aspekte polovogo dimorfizma [Assessment of body composition, somatic profile and basal metabolic rate indicators in mem bers of the Russian Federation youth national rowing team regarding sexual dimorphism]. Journal of New Medical Technologies. 2024;1:50–54. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24412/1609-2163-2024-1-50-54.
  3. Carter J.E.L. The Heath-Carter anthropometric somatotype. Instruction manual. San Diego State University. San Diego. CA. 2002;4:26.
  4. Heath B.H., Carter J.E.L. A modified somatotype method. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1967;27(1):57–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330270108
  5. Wan C.S., Ward L.C., Halim J. et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate body composition, and change in adiposity, in overweight and obese adolescents: comparison with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:249. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-249
  6. Shaikh M.G., Crabtree N.J., Shaw N.J., Kirk J.M.: Body fat estimation using bioelectrical impedance. Horm Res. 2007;68:8–10. https://doi.org/10.1159/000098481
  7. Sipatrova A.G., Godina E.Z., Permiakova E.Yu., Anisimova A.V., Zubko A.V., Rudnev S.G. Bioimpedance assessment of body composition using ABC-01 ‘Medas’ and DIAMANT-AIST instruments: a comparison. Lomonosov Journal of Anthropology (LJA) (Moscow University Anthropology Bulletin). 2023;2:70–81. (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32521/2074-8132.2023.2.070-081
  8. Semenov M.M., Vybornaya K.V., Radzhabkadiev R.M., et al. Assessment of body types of patients with grade I–III obesity according to the Heath-Carter scheme using various formulas. Bulletin of Restorative Medicine. 2022;21(6):78–90. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2022-21-6-78-90
  9. Chaplygina E.V., Elizarova E.S., Sankova I.V., et al. Assessment of the anatomical components of the somatotype using the methods of somatotyping and bioimpedance analysis. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2022;3:111. https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.31765.
  10. International Society for Advancement of Kinanthropometry. International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment. International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry; Potchefstroom, South Africa: 2001.
  11. Smirnov A.V., Kolesnikov V.A., Nikolaev D.V., Eryukova T.A. ABC-01 “Medass”: analizator otsenki balansa vodnykh sektorov organizma s programmnym obespecheniem (rukovodstvo poľzovatelya). M.: NTTs Medass. 2009. 38 s.
  12. Kolesnikov V.A., Rudnev S.G., Nikolaev D.V., et al. On the new protocol for assessing the somatotype according to the Heath-Carter scheme in the software of the bioimpedance body composition analyzer. Bulletin of Moscow University. Episode 23: Anthropology. 2016;4:4–13.
  13. Rudnev S.G., Negasheva M.A., Godina E.Z. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2019. 1272 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1272/1/012001
  14. Eston R., Reilly T. Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology - laboratory manual. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge; 2009. p. 33. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203868744
  15. Ackland T. Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology laboratory manual, 2nd edition. Volume 1: Anthropometry; Volume 2: Exercise physiology. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(5):308. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2004.005777
  16. Winter E.M., Eston R.G., Lamb K.L. Statistical analyses in the physiology of exercise and kinanthropometry. J Sports Sci. 2001;19(10):761–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404101317015429
  17. Wentz L.M., Webb P.S., Burks K. A Comprehensive Method of Assessing Body Composition Using Kinanthropometry in Human Performance Training. J Spec Oper Med. 2022;22(2):37–41. https://doi.org/10.55460/VFOY-ZEG6
  18. Sakibaev K.S., Nikityuk D.B., Alekseyeva N.T., Klochkova S.V., Tashmatova N.M. Characteristics of muscle mass in women of different constitutions. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2019;12(12):6193–6197. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2019.01075.8
  19. Nuruev M., Sakibaev K., Dzholdosheva G., Maksimova K., Kanymgul A.K. Features of circumference sizes in women of different constitutional groups. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging. 2023;43(1):40–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12791
Language: English
Page range: 99 - 106
Submitted on: Jan 15, 2025
|
Published on: Aug 4, 2025
Published by: University of Oslo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Kyialbek Sakibaev, Alexander Meshtel, Tatyana Grichanova, Kylychbek Suiunov, Abdyrakhman Eshiev, Sagynbek Dzholdubaev, Nazgul Tashmatova, Mirlan Nuruev, Aiperi Alimbekova, Akmaral Argynbaeva, Uulkan Manas Kyzy, Bekbolot Keneshbaev, Kulpunai Karimova, published by University of Oslo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.