Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Predictive classification and regression models for bioimpedance vector analysis: Insights from a southern Cuban cohort Cover

Predictive classification and regression models for bioimpedance vector analysis: Insights from a southern Cuban cohort

Open Access
|Aug 2025

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1:

Confusion matrix of trained models: a) Health status, b) BIVA status, c) quartile and d) centile responses.
Confusion matrix of trained models: a) Health status, b) BIVA status, c) quartile and d) centile responses.

Fig. 2:

Feature importance of trained models: a) Health status, b) BIVA Status, c) quartile and d) centile responses.
Feature importance of trained models: a) Health status, b) BIVA Status, c) quartile and d) centile responses.

Fig. 3:

Response vs predicted plot of the selected responses.
Response vs predicted plot of the selected responses.

Fig. 4:

observable and predictions of Zc, θc, Xcc and Rc across various categories: Health Status (Cancer, Healthy), Sex, Quartile (1, 2, 3, 4), Centile (50, 75,95 and 100%), and BIVA status (11, 12, 13, 14, 21, 22, 23, 31, 32, 33, 41, 42, 43, 44).
observable and predictions of Zc, θc, Xcc and Rc across various categories: Health Status (Cancer, Healthy), Sex, Quartile (1, 2, 3, 4), Centile (50, 75,95 and 100%), and BIVA status (11, 12, 13, 14, 21, 22, 23, 31, 32, 33, 41, 42, 43, 44).

Fig. 5:

Schematic representation of BIA vector analysis (BIVA), presenting the maximum and minimum values of Zc, θc, Xcc and Rc (relative to their respective medians).
Schematic representation of BIA vector analysis (BIVA), presenting the maximum and minimum values of Zc, θc, Xcc and Rc (relative to their respective medians).

Response models and their respective metrics for the classification of health status and location variables_ The column Class includes Health Status (Cancer, Healthy), Quartile (1, 2, 3, 4), Centile (50, 75, 95, and 100%), and BIVA status (11, 12, 13, 14, 21, 22, 23, 31, 32, 33, 41, 42, 43, 44)_

ResponseModelAccuracyClassPrecisionRecallF1-score
Health statusFine Tree92.80%Cancer0.9120.9510.931
Healthy0.9470.9050.926
BIVA statusFine Tree99.50%111.0001.0001.000
121.0001.0001.000
131.0001.0001.000
141.0001.0001.000
211.0001.0001.000
221.0001.0001.000
230.8570.7500.800
311.0001.0001.000
321.0001.0001.000
330.8890.9410.914
411.0001.0001.000
421.0001.0001.000
431.0001.0001.000
441.0001.0001.000
QuartileLinear SVM100%11.0001.0001.000
21.0000.9830.991
30.9901.0000.995
41.0001.0001.000
CentileRUS Boosted Tree97%50%0.9880.9840.986
75%0.9590.9530.956
95%0.9480.9380.943
100%0.9571.0000.978

Accuracy parameters of each model_

ResponseModelR2RMSEMSEMAE
Zc (Ω)Linear1.0000.351(Ω2)0.123 (Ω)0.233 (Ω)
θc (°)Linear0.9800.237 (°2)0.056 (°)0.166 (°)
Xcc (Ω)Linear SVM0.9902.378 (Ω2)5.652 (Ω)1.674 (Ω)
Rc (Ω)Linear SVM1.0004.216 (Ω2)17.773 (Ω)3.223 (Ω)
Language: English
Page range: 89 - 98
Submitted on: Jan 10, 2025
Published on: Aug 4, 2025
Published by: University of Oslo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Jose Luis García Bello, Taira Batista Luna, My Phuong Pham-Ho, Minh Tho Nguyen, Alcibíades Lara Lafargue, Héctor Manuel Camué Ciria, Yohandys A. Zulueta, published by University of Oslo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.