Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Comparison of the mean body composition of male university students measured with two different bioimpedance devices (Mean±SD)_
| Bioimpedance Analyzer | Body Fat (%) | Muscle Mass (%) | Basal Metabolic Rate (kcal) | Body Mass Index (kg/m2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMRON | 17.55±1.23 | 41.69±0.74 | 1641.55±22.88 | 22.65±0.59 |
| BIODY | 16.87±1.03 | 45.24±0.60 | 1737.25±15.14 | 22.52±0.56 |
| P-value (p =) | 0.67 | 0.001 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
General Measurements of the Population_
| Variable | Women | Men |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 20.8 ± 2.13 | 22.20 ± 3.24 |
| Body weight (kg) | 56.52 ± 7.30 | 66.94 ± 7.61 |
| Height (cm) | 156.10 ± 4.55 | 172.55 ± 4.52 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 74.42 ± 7.98 | 78.90 ± 6.75 |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 94.77 ± 4.48 | 93.80 ± 4.68 |
Comparison of the mean body condition of female university students measured with different bioimpedance devices (Mean±SD)_
| Bioimpedance Analyzer | Body Fat (%) | Muscle Mass (%) | Basal Metabolic Rate (kcal) | Body Mass Index (kg/m2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMRON | 35.12±1.43 | 26.14±0.79 | 1248.65±18.83 | 23.25±0.71 |
| BIODY | 30.10±0.97 | 35.52±0.51 | 1359.50±12.23 | 23.19±0.70 |
| P-value (p =) | 0.006 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.95 |