Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A fresh look at sports PSM-systems Cover

A fresh look at sports PSM-systems

Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance
Volume 14 (2023): Issue 1 (January 2023)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|May 2023
Figures & tables

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Pedagogical interpretation of the sports standard “R-Engine” results.

Figure 2.

Electrode application diagram.

Table 1.

Classification of the studied functional indicators.

IndicatorsResultScore
The intensity of the performed exercise (M, %) *≥ 85A
80-84.9B
75-79.9C
≤ 74.9D
Target heart rate for the transition to completely anaerobic zone (HRM, bpm) *≥ 171A
161-170B
151-160C
≤ 150D
General functional athlete readiness (GFAR, units) *≥ 3.5A
3.0-3.4B
2.5-2.9C
≤ 2.4D
Coefficient of Anaerobic Capacity (CANAC Q, beats)≥ 10.1A
7.5-10B
5.5-7.4C
≤ 5.4D

1 * - classification of Russian Ice Hockey Federation [4].

Table 2.

Results of the study of the General Functional Athlete Readiness with using the method "R-Engine" in all experimental series separately.

Indicators1st series2nd series3rd series4th series5th series
HRstart, bpm102.8 ± 13.6137.1 ± 15.7144.4 ± 17.9148.2 ± 15.1152.1 ± 16.2
HRfinish, bpm158.4 ± 15.7167.9 ± 14.7173.1 ± 11.9173.9 ± 11.6176.8 ± 11.9
RRstart, rpm17.1 ± 6.919.4 ± 4.722.1 ± 5.723.4 ± 4.724.1 ± 6.0
RRfinish, rpm33.7 ± 6.535.1 ± 5.137.6 ± 7.239.5 ± 7.940.0 ± 7.6
M, %66.7 ± 8.465.9 ± 7.267.7 ± 5.967.2 ± 7.168.4 ± 7.0
HRM, bpm129.5 ± 18.1134.7 ± 17.4134.7 ± 17.4140.1 ± 15.7143.4 ± 15.7
GFAR, units2.51 ± 0.702.48 ± 0.632.59 ± 0.642.54 ± 0.602.61 ± 0.57
CANAC Q, beats5.7 ± 1.295.9 ± 0.875.7 ± 1.135.4 ± 0.925.5 ± 0.99
Table 3.

The degree of correlation of functional indicators with CANAC Q in the study.

Indicators1st series2nd series3rd series4th series5th series
M, %r = 0.50r = 0.41r = 0.18r = 0.09r = 0.02
p < 0.01p < 0.01p > 0.05p > 0.05p > 0.05
HRM, bpmr = 0.55r = 0.40r = 0.19r = 0.08r = 0.04
p < 0.01p < 0.01p > 0.05p > 0.05p > 0.05
GFAR, unitsr = 0.53r = 0.51r = 0.38r = 0.29r = 0.33
p < 0.01p < 0.01p < 0.05p > 0.05p > 0.05
Table 4.

Classification of the studied functional indicators.

Functional indicatorsGroup in full (n=80)
HRstart, bpm136.9 ± 23.7
HRfinish, bpm170.0 ± 14.8
RRstart, rpm21.2 ± 6.2
RRfinish, rpm37.1 ± 7.4
CANAC (Q, beats)5.6 ± 1.07
Table 5.

The degree of correlation of functional indicators with CANAC Q.

Functional indicatorsGroup as a whole (n=80)Degree of correlation with CANAC Q
M, %67.2 ± 7.2r = 0.241; p < 0.01
HRM, bpm137.5 ± 17.1r = 0.237; p < 0.01
GFAR, units2.55 ± 0.63r = 0.406; p < 0.01
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2023-0003 | Journal eISSN: 1891-5469
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 13 - 18
Submitted on: Mar 9, 2023
Published on: May 26, 2023
Published by: University of Oslo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
bioimpedance,
rheography,
sport,
heart rate,
respiratory rate,
monitoring,
functional athlete readiness
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Bioengineering and biomedical engineering,
Biomedical electronics,
Life sciences,
Biophysics,
Medicine,
Biomedical engineering,
Physics,
Spectroscopy and metrology

© 2023 Vladimir Savostyanov, Alexander Kobelev, Anton Govorin, published by University of Oslo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 14 (2023): Issue 1 (January 2023)
Previous article
Next article