Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Improved estimation of left ventricular volume from electric field modeling Cover

Improved estimation of left ventricular volume from electric field modeling

Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance
Volume 12 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)
By: Leonie Korn,  Stephan Dahlmanns,  Steffen Leonhardt and  Marian Walter  
Open Access
|Dec 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Electric field distribution of to spheres with opposite charges Q (red) and -Q (blue). The measurement electrodes (green) are distanced by L. Background tissue (σba = 0) is assumed.
Electric field distribution of to spheres with opposite charges Q (red) and -Q (blue). The measurement electrodes (green) are distanced by L. Background tissue (σba = 0) is assumed.

Figure 2

Electric field distribution by applying the voltages -V0 (red) on a sphere and V0′=+V0 $V_{0}^{\prime }=+{{V}_{0}}$on a spare charge plate (blue). The measurement electrodes (green) are distanced by L. Muscle tissue (σm) with a thickness of b and background tissue (σba) are modeled.
Electric field distribution by applying the voltages -V0 (red) on a sphere and V0′=+V0 $V_{0}^{\prime }=+{{V}_{0}}$on a spare charge plate (blue). The measurement electrodes (green) are distanced by L. Muscle tissue (σm) with a thickness of b and background tissue (σba) are modeled.

Figure 3

Left: electric field distribution of the injection at the outer electrodes with distance d. Middle: electric field distribution of the injection at the inner electrodes with distance L. Right: electric field distribution considering both the injection and the measurement field according to lead field theory.
Left: electric field distribution of the injection at the outer electrodes with distance d. Middle: electric field distribution of the injection at the inner electrodes with distance L. Right: electric field distribution considering both the injection and the measurement field according to lead field theory.

Figure 4

Left: five cylindrical glass containers representing simplistic volumes to test the measurement system and calculation methods. 1: radius 13.3 mm, 2: radius 17.5 mm, 3: radius 32.8 mm, 4: radius 38.6 mm, 5: radius 50.4 mm. Right: close-up on the measurement catheter and a possible cascaded measurement configuration.
Left: five cylindrical glass containers representing simplistic volumes to test the measurement system and calculation methods. 1: radius 13.3 mm, 2: radius 17.5 mm, 3: radius 32.8 mm, 4: radius 38.6 mm, 5: radius 50.4 mm. Right: close-up on the measurement catheter and a possible cascaded measurement configuration.

Figure 5

a) Left ventricular in-vitro phantoms made from silicone (left: carbon, right: pure), b) C-arm with manual test bench to measure phantom dimension, c) Cross-sectional areas obtained from CT measurements at the center electrode pair, adapted from [32].
a) Left ventricular in-vitro phantoms made from silicone (left: carbon, right: pure), b) C-arm with manual test bench to measure phantom dimension, c) Cross-sectional areas obtained from CT measurements at the center electrode pair, adapted from [32].

Figure 6

Estimated radii using the classical Wei, the plate, and the lead ACM compared to the known radii of the cylinders (Data). Left: conductivity of saline solution σ1 = 1.69 S/m, right: conductivity of saline solution σ2 = 0.62 S/m.
Estimated radii using the classical Wei, the plate, and the lead ACM compared to the known radii of the cylinders (Data). Left: conductivity of saline solution σ1 = 1.69 S/m, right: conductivity of saline solution σ2 = 0.62 S/m.

Figure 7

Estimated radii by the ACMs (Wei, Plate, Lead) obtained from the conductances measured inside the in-vitro phantoms compared to reference radii (Data). Left: insulating phantom of pure silicone, right: silicone phantom enriched with carbon.
Estimated radii by the ACMs (Wei, Plate, Lead) obtained from the conductances measured inside the in-vitro phantoms compared to reference radii (Data). Left: insulating phantom of pure silicone, right: silicone phantom enriched with carbon.

Measured volumes inside the silicone ventricle from CT measurements_ Cross-sectional areas obtained between the center electrode pair_ Estimated equivalent center radius_

StepVolume (mL)Area (mm2)Radius (mm)
1117.901248.8419.94
2107.121022.5518.04
397.96855.5016.50
487.20683.1514.75
576.84506.8312.70
669.46401.1211.30
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2021-0015 | Journal eISSN: 1891-5469
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 125 - 134
Submitted on: Jun 16, 2021
|
Published on: Dec 27, 2021
Published by: University of Oslo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Left ventricular volume,
Electric field distribution,
LVAD
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Bioengineering and biomedical engineering,
Biomedical electronics,
Life sciences,
Biophysics,
Medicine,
Biomedical engineering,
Physics,
Spectroscopy and metrology

© 2021 Leonie Korn, Stephan Dahlmanns, Steffen Leonhardt, Marian Walter, published by University of Oslo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 12 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)Next article