Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
From a Partner for Cooperation to a Systemic Rival for De-risking: Evolution of the EU’s perception of the rise of China (2016–2020) Cover

From a Partner for Cooperation to a Systemic Rival for De-risking: Evolution of the EU’s perception of the rise of China (2016–2020)

By:   
Open Access
|Dec 2025

Figures & Tables

Table 1:

% in the country who have an unfavorable view of the PRC.

201520162017201820192020
USA55%47%47%60%66%76%
France--49%61%52%54%70%
Germany50%60%53%54%56%71%
Italy57%61%59%60%57%62%
Spain50%56%43%48%53%63%
Poland--42%29%37%34%---
Hungary--44%45%47%37%---
Greece--37%40%48%32%---
Sweden--59%49%53%70%85%
Netherlands--43%42%45%58%73%

[i] Source: Pew Research Center, Laura Silver, Christine Huang and Laura Clancy, “How Global Public Opinion Has Shifted in the Xi Era”, 28 September 2022.

Table 2:

Fox and Godeman’s classification of the EU member states’ attitudes toward the PRC in 2008.

Economics\PoliticsPolitically criticalPolitically supportive
Economically liberalGroup 1
Ideological free traders
Group 3
Accommodating Mercantilists
Economically protectionistGroup 2
Assertive industrialists
Group 4
European Followers

[i] Source: Fox and Godeman, op. cit.: 3–4.

Figure 1:

Matrix by Fox and Godement 2008.

Source: Screenshot from Fox and Godement, op. cit., p. 4.

Table 3:

EU member states’ positions in domestic politics and external relations.

External \ domesticThe RightThe Left
Transatlantic relationship as priorityAtlanticismProgress movement
European integration as priorityEuropean SovereigntismEuropean socialism

[i] Source: the Author.

Figure 2:

Front page headlines in the People’s Daily of 2007 and 2017.

Source: Screenshot of ET Today of 23 October 2007 and 26 October 2017.

Language: English
Page range: 157 - 178
Published on: Dec 31, 2025
Published by: Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Hungdah Su, published by Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.