Innovation and adaptation in public–private partnerships in the military domain under broad-spectrum influencing: Towards a competence-based strategic approach

Figures & Tables

Issue	Manifestation	Strength/Weakness
The undefined role of a private Commitment to certification Centralised administration Fragmentation of R&D&I activities	Not defined in project steering, lack of steering for development outside project work Requirement for existing quality certification recorded in Document PAK 06-03, HD 314 A Finnish Defence Forces development programme led by Defence Command Finland Activities divided into seven different organisations Total share is <2% of defence expenditure Non-utilisation of international financial instruments	Weakness: risk of failure to notice innovations Strength: allocation of limited resources Weakness: the cost of certification for a start-up company Weakness: time required for certification Strength: opportunity for audits Strength: continuous systematic evaluation of processes Weakness: binds the activities to funding periods Strength: helps to systematically consolidate limited resources Weakness: complicates communication between different actors Weakness: fragments financial resources Increases the number of impact points for broadspectrum influencing Strength: units focus on their own area of expertise Weakness: limits research and development work Weakness: forces consolidation of resources and prioritisation of projects Strength: forces consolidation of resources and prioritisation of projects