The Eurasian security system: a preliminary framework for understanding the emerging Sino–Russian relationship
By:
References
- Albert, M., & Buzan, B. (2011). Securitization, sectors and functional differentiation. Security Dialogue, 42(4/5) Special issue on The Politics of Securitization (August–October 2011), pp. 413–425.
- Andrijauskas, K. (2022). An Analysis of China's Economic Coercion Against Lithuania. Council on Foreign Relations. Available at https://www.cfr.org/blog/analysis-chinas-economic-coercion-against-lithuania [accessed 6 September, 2022].
- Bertalanffy, L. (1986). General System Theory. Foundations, Development, Applications. George Braziller, New York.
- Bousquet, A., & Curtis, S. (2011). Beyond models and metaphors: Complexity theory, systems thinking and international relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 24(1), pp. 43–62.
- Braumoeller, B. F. (2012). The Great Powers and the International System: Systemic Theory in Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Bueger, C., & Gadinger, F. (2015). The play of international practice. International Studies Quarterly. 2015(59), pp. 449–460.
- Bull, H. (2002). The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics, 4th edn. Columbia University Press, New York.
- Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Carlson, BG. (2022). China-Russia cooperation in nuclear deterrence. In: Kirchberger, S., Sinjen, S., & Wörmer, N. (eds.), Russia-China Relations: Emerging Alliance or Eternal Rivals? Springer, Cham, pp. 141–161.
- Cederman, L. E. (2010). Complexity and change in world politics: Resurrecting systems theory. In: Albert, M., Cederman, L. E., & Wendt, A. (eds.), New Systems Theories of World Politics. Palgrave, New York, pp. 127–157.
- Charon, P., & Jeangène Vilmer, J. B. (2021). Chinese Influence Operations – A Machiavellian Moment. Institute for Strategic Research (IRSEM), Paris.
- Chaudoin, S., & Milner, H. V., & Pang, X. (2015, Spring). International systems and domestic politics: Linking complex interactions with empirical models in international relations. International Organization, 69, pp. 275–309.
- Cheng, D. (2011). Chinese lessons from the Gulf Wars. In: Scobell, A., Lai, D., & Kamphausen, R. (eds.), Chinese Lessons from other People's Wars. Strategic Studies Institute, Carlisle PA, pp. 152–199.
- Cunningham, E., Saich, T., & Turiel, J. (2020). Understanding CCP Resilience: Surveying Chinese Public Opinion Through Time. Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation. Available at https://ash.harvard.edu/publications/understanding-ccp-resilience-surveying-chinese-public-opinion-through-time [accessed 6 September, 2022].
- Deyermond, R. (2018). The collective security treaty organization. In: Tsyganov, A. P. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Russian Foreign Policy. Routledge, London & New York, pp. 421–429.
- Donaldson, R. H., & Nadkarni, V. (2019). The Foreign Policy of Russia. Changing Systems, Enduring Interests, 6th edn. Routledge, New York & London.
- Donnelly, J. (2012). The elements of the structures of international systems. International Organization, 66 Fall 2012, pp. 609–643.
- Donnelly, J. (2019). systems, levels, and structural theory: Waltz's theory is not a systemic theory (and why that matters for international relations today). European Journal of International Relations, 25(3), pp. 904–930.
- Doshi, R. (2021). The Long Game: China's Grand Strategy to Displace American Order. Oxford University Press, New York.
- Elliot, M. (2018). What is the source of ethnic tensions in China. In: Rudolph, J. (ed.), The China Questions: Critical Insights into a Rising Power. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 33–42.
- Evers, M. (2020). Just the facts: Why norms remain relevant in an age of practice. International Theory, 2020(12), pp. 220–230.
- Fravel, M. T. (2019). Active Defense: China's Military Strategy since 1949. Princeton University Press, Princeton & Oxford.
- Gaddis, J. L. (1996). History, science and the study of international relations. In: Woods, N. (ed.), Explaining International Relations Since 1945. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 32–48.
- Gaddis, J. L. (2005). Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of American National Security Policy During the Cold War. Oxford University Press, New York.
- Gough, I., Runciman, G., Mace, R., Hodgson, G., & Rustin, M. (2008). Darwinian evolutionary theory and the social sciences. Twenty-First Century Society, 3(1), pp. 65–86.
- Greitens, S. C., Lee, M., & Yazici, E. (2020). Counterterrorism and preventive repression: China's changing strategy in Xinjiang. International Security, 44(3), pp. 9–47.
- Haas, M. de. (2001). An analysis of Soviet, CIS and Russian military doctrines 1990–2000. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 14(4), pp. 1–34.
- Haas, M. de. (2019). Russian-Chinese security cooperation: The bear and the Dragon. In: Kanet, R. E. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Russian Security. Routledge, London & New York, pp. 332–341.
- Hanén, T. (2017). Yllätysten edessä: Kompleksisuusteoreettinen tulkinta yllättävien ja dynaamisten tilanteiden johtamisesta. Julkaisusarja 1: Tutkimuksia nro 11. Väitöskirja. Maanpuolustuskorkeakoulu, Helsinki.
- Holland, J. (1995). Hidden Order. How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Helix Books, New York.
- Huntington, Samuel P. (2002). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. London: Free Press.
- ШОС. (2009). Соглашение между правительствами государств-членов Шанхайской организации сотрудничества о сотрудничестве в области обеспечения международной информационной безопасности. 16 июня 2009 года. Екатеринбурr. Available at https://base.garant.ru/2571379/ [accessed 29 March, 2019]
- Jackson, W. D. (2002). Encircled again: Russia's military assesses threats in a Post-Soviet world. Political Science Quarterly, 1(3), pp. 373–400.
- Jackson, P. T. (2006). Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of The West. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
- Jackson, P., & Nexon, D. (1999). Relations before States: Substance, process and the study of world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 5(3), pp. 291–332.
- Jackson, P., & Nexon, D. (2019). Reclaiming the social: Relationalism in anglophone international studies. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(5), pp. 582–600.
- Jakóbowski, J., & Kłysiński, K. (2021). The Non-Strategic Partnership: Belarus-China Relations. Centre for Eastern Studies. Available at https://www.osw.waw.pl/sites/default/files/OSW-Studies_The-non-strategic-partnership_net-1.pdf [accessed 6 September, 2022].
- Jiang, Z. (1993). 国际形势和军事战略方针. Speech at the Central Military Commission in 13.1.1993. Available at: http://www.reformdata.org/1993/0113/5616.shtml [accessed 19 October, 2021]
- Joint Statement of the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China on the International Relations Entering a New Era and the Global Sustainable Development. Website of the President of Russia, 4.2.2022. Available at http://en.kremlin.ru/supplement/5770 [accessed 2 May, 2022]
- Jonsson, O. (2019). The Russian Understanding of War: Blurring the Lines between War and Peace. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC.
- Jüris, F. (2021). Chinese security interests in the Arctic: From Sea Lanes to scientific cooperation. In: Gaens, B., Jüris, F., & Raik, K. (eds.), Nordic-Baltic Connectivity with Asia via the Arctic: Assessing Opportunities and Risks. International Centre for Defence and Security, Tallinn, pp. 126–147.
- Kanet, R. E., & Piet, R. (eds.). (2014). Shifting Priorities in Russia's Foreign and Security Policy. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Surrey.
- Katzenstein, P. (1996). The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics. Columbia University Press, New York.
- Katzenstein, P. (2010). A World of plural and pluralist civilizations multiple actors, traditions, and practices. In: Katzenstein, P. (ed.), Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives. Routledge, New York, pp. 1–40.
- Kennedy, P. M. (1987). The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. Vintage Books, New York.
- Kirchberger, S., Sinjen, S., & Wörmer, N. (eds.). (2022). Russia-China Relations. Emerging Alliance or Eternal Rivals? Springer, Cham.
- Kukkola, J. (2020). Digital Soviet Union. The Russian National Segment of Internet as a Closed National Network Shaped by Strategic Cultural Ideas. Doctoral Dissertation. National Defence University Series 1: Research Publications No. 40. National Defence University, Helsinki.
- Kurth, N. (2018). Asia-pacific and China. In: Tsyganov, A. P. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Russian Foreign Policy. Routledge, London & New York, pp. 254–268.
- Lewis, J., & Xue, L. (2006). Imagined Enemies: China Prepares for Uncertain War. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
- Lim, Y. H. (2014). China's Naval Power: An Offensive Realist Approach. Ashgate, Farnham.
- Mackinder, H. J. (1904). The geographical pivot of history. The Geographical Journal, 23(4), pp. 421–437.
- Mankoff, J. (2012). Russian Foreign Policy: The Return of Great Power Politics. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Lanham.
- Nikitina, Y. (2014). The “Color Revolutions” and “Arab Spring” in Russian official discourse. Connections. 14(1), pp. 87–104.
- Orsini, A., Le, Prestre, P., Haas, P. M., Brosig, M., Pattberg, P., Widerberg, O., Gomez-Mera, L., Morin, J. F., Harrison, N. E., Geyer, R., & Chandler, D. (2020). Forum: complex systems and international governance. International Studies Review, 2020(22), pp. 1008–1038.
- Pan, C. (2020). Enfolding wholes in parts: Quantum holography and international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 26(S1), pp. 14–38.
- Pouliot, V. (2008). The logic of practicality: A theory of practice of security communities. International Organization, 62(2), pp. 257–288.
- Puranen, M., & Kukkola, J. (2021). Sino–Russian relations already bear signs of a military alliance. The National Interest. 20.4.2021. Available at https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/sino-russian-relations-already-bear-signs-military-alliance-183120 [accessed 2 September, 2022]
- Putin, V. ‘On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians’ Kremlin.ru 12.7.2021. Available at http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/66181 [accessed 3 September, 2022]
- Pynnöniemi, K. (2018). Russia's national security strategy: Analysis of conceptual evolution. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 31(2), pp. 240–256.
- Ramani, S. (2021). Russia and China in Africa: Prospective Partners or Asymmetric Rivals? South African Institute of International Affairs. Available at https://saiia.org.za/research/russia-and-china-in-africa-prospective-partners-or-asymmetric-rivals/ [accessed 6 September, 2022]
- Renz, B. (2018). Russia's Military Revival. Polity Press, Cambridge.
- Santa Fe Institute. (n.d.). Glossary. Retrieved November 6, 2015, Available at https://www.complexityexplorer.org/explore/glossary [accessed 2 May, 2022]
- Scartozzi, C. (2018). New taxonomy for international relations: Rethinking the international system as a complex adaptive system. Journal on Policy and Complex Systems, 4(1), pp. 109–133.
- Šćepanović, J. (2022). The Sheriff and the Banker? Russia and China in Central Asia. War on the Rocks. 13.6.2022. Available at https://warontherocks.com/2022/06/the-sheriff-andthe-banker-russia-and-china-in-central-asia/ [accessed 6 September, 2022]
- Sheldon-Duplaix, A. (2022). Russia-China naval partnership and its significance. In: Kirchberger, S., Sinjen, S., & Wörmer, N. (eds.), Russia-China Relations: Emerging Alliance or Eternal Rivals? Springer, Cham, pp. 101–120.
- Soldatov, A., & Borogan, I. (2015). The Red Web. The Struggle between Russia's Digital Dictators and The New Online Revolutionaries. Public Affairs, New York.
- Spykman, N. (1944). Geography of the Peace. Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York.
- Thomas, T. (2020). The Chinese Way of War: How Has it Changed? The Mitre, McLean, VA.
- Tikk, E., & Kerttunen, M. (2018). Parabasis. Cyber-diplomacy in Stalemate. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, 2018. Available at https://nupi.brage.unit.no/nupi-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2569401/NUPI_Report_5_18_Tikk_Kerttunen.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [accessed 6 May, 2019].
- Turner, S. (2011). China and Russia after the Russian-Georgian War. Comparative Strategy, 30(1), pp. 50–59.
- Waltz, Keneth (1979). Theory of International Politics. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
- Weitz, R. (2021). Assessing Chinese-Russian military exercises: Past progress and future trends. Center for Strategic and International Studies. Available at https://www.csis.org/analysis/assessing-chinese-russian-military-exercises-past-progress-and-future-trends [accessed 2 July, 2022].
- Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Wuthnow, J. (2017). China's new ‘Black Box’: Problems and prospects for the central national security commission. The China Quarterly, 232, pp. 886–903.
Language: English
Page range: 63 - 76
Submitted on: May 16, 2022
Accepted on: Sep 9, 2022
Published on: Oct 29, 2022
Published by: National Defense University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2022 Juha Kukkola, Matti Puranen, published by National Defense University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.