Military organisations and emerging technologies – How do unmanned systems find a role in future navies?
By:
References
- Adamsky, D. P. (2008). Through the looking glass: The Soviet military-technical revolution and the American revolution in military affairs. Journal of Strategic Studies, 31(2), pp. 257–294. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390801940443." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/01402390801940443.</a>
- Andersson, K. (2020). Notes on military capability concepts and their relevance for analysis of system characteristics. Stockholm: Swedish Defence University. Available at http://fhs.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1473159/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
- Andersson, K., Martin, B., Carina, M., Björn, P., Peter, S., Eva, J., et al. (2015). Military utility: A proposed concept to support decision-making. Technology in Society, 43, pp. 23–32. doi.: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.07.001." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.07.001.</a>
- Antwerpen, C. V., & Bowley, D. K. (2012). An Australian approach to concept development and experimentation: Linking strategy to capability. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63(2), pp. 278–292. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.28." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1057/jors.2011.28.</a>
- Batalden, B. M., Peter, W., Johan, F. R., & Øyvind, H. (2019). Enhanced human-machine interaction by fuzzy logic in semi-autonomous maritime operations. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 784, pp. 46–54. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94346-6_5." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/978-3-319-94346-6_5.</a>
- Baxter, G., & Sommerville, I. (2011). Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering. Interacting with Computers, 23(1), pp. 4–17. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.003." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.003.</a>
- Berkowitz, B. (2014). Sea power in the robotic age. Issues in Science and Technology, 30(2), pp. 33–40.
- Biddle, S. (2004). Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle. Military Power. STU-Stud. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
- British Ministry of Defence. (2020). How defence works (Version 6.0, September 2020). British Ministry of Defence. Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/920219/20200922-How_Defence_Works_V6.0_Sep_2020.pdf.
- Denscombe, M. (2010). Good Research Guide : For Small-Scale Social Research Projects, 4th edn. Open up Study Skills. Open University Press, Maidenhead.
- Department of Defence. (2014). Defence Capability Development Handbook 2014. Australian Government, Department of Defence, Canberra. Available at https://www.defence.gov.au/publications/docs/DefenceCapabilityDevelopmentHandbook(DCDH)2014-internetcopy.pdf.
- Deparment of Defence. (2020). Capability Life Cycle Manual (Version 2.1). Department of Defence, Canberra. Available at https://www.dica.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Capability-Life-Cycle-Manual-v2-1.pdf.
- Department of the Navy. (2021). Department of the Navy Unmanned Campaign Framework. Department of the Navy, Washington DC. Available at https://www.navy.mil/Portals/1/Strategic/20210315UnmannedCampaign_Final_LowRes.pdf.
- Dyson, T. (2019). The military as a learning organisation: Establishing the fundamentals of best-practice in lessons-learned. Defence Studies, 19(2), pp. 107–129. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2019.1573637." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/14702436.2019.1573637.</a>
- Fitzsimmons, M. (2007). Whither capabilities-based planning? Joint Force Quarterly, 44(1st quarter), pp. 101–105. Available at https://ndupress.ndu.edu/portals/68/Documents/jfq/jfq-44.pdf.
- Franssen, M., & Peter, K. (2009). Sociotechnical systems. In: Olsen, J. K. B., Pedersen, S. A., & Hendricks, V. F. (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chicester, pp. 223–226. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444310795.ch40." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1002/9781444310795.ch40.</a>
- Friesl, M., Sackmann, S. A., & Kremser, S. (2011). Knowledge sharing in new organizational entities the impact of hierarchy, organizational context, micro-politics and suspicion. Cross Cultural Management-an International Journal, 18(1), pp. 71–86. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/13527601111104304." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1108/13527601111104304.</a>
- Griffin, S. (2017). Military innovation studies: Multidisciplinary or lacking discipline? Journal of Strategic Studies, 40(1–2), pp. 196–224. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2016.1196358." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/01402390.2016.1196358.</a>
- Grissom, A. (2006). The future of military innovation studies. Journal of Strategic Studies, 29(5), pp. 905–934. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390600901067." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/01402390600901067.</a>
- Hannay, J. E., & Gjørven, E. (2021). Leveraging network-centric strategic goals in capabilities. Journal of Military Studies, 10(1), pp. 90–104. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/jms-2021-0001." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/jms-2021-0001.</a>
- Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10 SPEC ISS.), pp. 997–1010. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1002/smj.332.</a>
- Ho, G., Pavlovic, N., & Arrabito, R. (2011). Human factors issues with operating unmanned underwater vehicles. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 429–33. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551088." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/1071181311551088.</a>
- Jakobsen, P. V. (2017). War Studies Traditionen (På Syddansk Universitet): Hvad, Hvordan, Hvad Nu? Økonomi Og Politik, 90(1), pp. 73–80. Available at https://www.djoef-forlag.dk/openaccess/oep/files/2017/1_2017/1_2017_10.pdf [accessed 3 June, 2021].
- James, A. D. (2016). Emerging Technologies and Military Capability. In Bitzinger, R. A. (ed.), Emerging Critical Technologies and Security in the Asia-Pacific. . Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, pp. 6–21. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137461285_2." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1057/9781137461285_2.</a>
- Johansson, L. (2018). Ethical aspects of military maritime and aerial autonomous systems. Journal of Military Ethics, 17(2–3), pp. 140–155. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2018.1552512." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/15027570.2018.1552512.</a>
- Kelly, J. E. (1978). A reappraisal of sociotechnical systems theory. Human Relations, 31(12), pp. 1069–1099. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/001872677803101204." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/001872677803101204.</a>
- Kollars, N. (2017). Genius and mastery in military innovation. Survival, 59(2), pp. 125–138. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2017.1302193." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/00396338.2017.1302193.</a>
- Larsbrink, G. (2020). Obemannade Och Autonoma System, Ett Marint Paradigmskifte – Del 2. Tidskrift i Sjöväsendet, 3, pp. 249–257. Available at https://www.koms.se/tidskrift/arkiv/nr-3-20/ [accessed 15 February, 2021].
- Liwång, H. (2022). Defense development: The role of co-creation in filling the gap between policy-makers and technology development. Technology in Society, January, 101913. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101913." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101913.</a>
- Maguer, A., Been, R., Tesei, A., Alves, J. Grandi, V., & Biagini, S. (2018). Recent technological advances in underwater autonomy. In 2018 OCEANS - MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Oceans, OCEANS – Kobe 2018, pp. 1–8. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANSKOBE.2018.8558791." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1109/OCEANSKOBE.2018.8558791.</a>
- Maier, M. W. (1998). Architecting principles for systems-of-systems. Systems Engineering, 1(4), 267–284. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6858(1998)1:4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1002/(sici)1520-6858(1998)1:4</a><267::Aid-sys3>3.0.Co;2-d.
- Mansfield, T., Sobrino, P. C., Viñas, A. C., Maglione, G. L., Been, R., and Tremori, A. (2019). Approaches to realize the potential of autonomous underwater systems in concept development and experimentation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 11472 LNCS, pp. 614–626. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14984-0_46." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/978-3-030-14984-0_46.</a>
- NATO ACT. (2021). NATO CD&E Handbook. NATO ACT, Norfolk. Available at https://www.act.nato.int/application/files/1316/1889/0702/NATO-ACT-CDE-Handbook_A_Concept_Developers_Toolbox.pdf [accessed 33 June, 2021].
- NATO Standarization Office. (2021). AAP-06 Edition 2021 NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions. NATO. Available at https://nso.nato.int/nso/nsdd/main/standards?search=aap-06 [accessed 4 February, 2022].
- Pikner, I. (2015). Concept development & experimentation as tool for capability development. International Conference Knowledge-based Organization, 21(1), pp. 88–93. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/kbo-2015-0015." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1515/kbo-2015-0015.</a>
- Prives, L. (2020). A bold revolution: Bringing commercial research and development advancements to U.S. Military innovation [women to watch]. IEEE Women in Engineering Magazine, 2020. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/MWIE.2020.2977524." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1109/MWIE.2020.2977524.</a>
- Project Group SubTechSweden. (2019). NRIA-U 2019, National Research and Innovation Agenda for Undervater Technology, Last Modidied. SubTechSweden. Available at http://subtechsweden.se/agenda-nria-u-2019/. [accessed 7 January, 2021].
- Rogers, R. (2012). The legal regime governing AUV operations how far and how wide. 2012 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, AUV 2012, pp. 1–5. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/AUV.2012.6380745." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1109/AUV.2012.6380745.</a>
- Scala, N. M., & Howard, J. P. (2020). Preface. In Scala, N. M., & Howard, J. P. (eds.), Handbook of Military and Defense Operations Research. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. ix–x.
- Schaefer, K. E., Hill, S. G., & Jentsch, F. G. (2019). Trust in human-autonomy teaming: A review of trust research from the US Army Research Laboratory Robotics Collaborative Technology Alliance. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 784, pp. 102–114. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94346-6_10." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/978-3-319-94346-6_10.</a>
- Schmitt, M. N., & Goddard, D. S. (2016). International law and the military use of unmanned maritime systems. International Review of the Red Cross, 98(902), pp. 567–592. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383117000339." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/S1816383117000339.</a>
- Smith, C. J., & Oosthuizen, R. (2012). Applying systems engineering principles towards developing defence capabilities. In 22nd Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering, INCOSE 2012 and the 8th Biennial European Systems Engineering Conference 2012, EuSEC 2012, 2: pp. 1056–1070. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2012.tb01383.x." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1002/j.2334-5837.2012.tb01383.x.</a>
- Sparrow, R., & Lucas, G. (2016). When robots rule the waves? Naval War College Review, 69(4), pp. 49–78. Available at https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol69/iss4/7 [accessed 7 January, 2021].
- Teeneti, C. R., Truscott, T. T., Beal, D. N., & Pantic, Z. (2019). Review of wireless charging systems for autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, pp. 1–20. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2019.2953015." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1109/JOE.2019.2953015.</a>
- Thaba, J. M. (2020). Technology Support for Military Capability Based Acquisition.” In 26th International Association for Management of Technology Conference, IAMOT 2017 Vienna, 987–1000. International Association for Management of Technology (IAMOT).
- Till, G. (2018). “Navies and Technology.” In Seapower?: A Guide for the Twenty-First Century, edited by Geoffrey Till, 4th edn., 147–82. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
- Trist, E. (1981). “The Evolution of Socio-Technical Systems: A Conceptual Framework and an Action Research Program.” Issues in the Quality of Working Life, A Series of Occasional Papers No. 2 June 1981. Ontario Ministry of Labour, Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre.
- Veldhuis, G. A., de Reus, N. M., & Keijser, B. M. J, (2018). Concept development for comprehensive operations support with modeling and simulation. Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, 17(1), pp. 99–116. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1548512918814407." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/1548512918814407.</a>
- Vermaas, P., Kroes, P. van de Poel, I., Franssen, M., & Houkes, W. (2011). A philosophy of technology: From technical artefacts to sociotechnical systems. Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology and Society, 6. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2200/s00321ed1v01y201012ets014." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2200/s00321ed1v01y201012ets014.</a>
- Walker, G. H., Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., & Jenkins, D. P. (2008). A review of sociotechnical systems theory: A classic concept for new command and control paradigms. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 9(6), pp. 479–499. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220701635470." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/14639220701635470.</a>
- Webster, L., Morris, B. A., & Dwyer, D. M. (2019). A Framework for Assessing the Impact of Integrating New Equipment onto Naval Vessels. In RINA, Royal Institution of Naval Architects - IMC 2019: Pacific International Maritime Conference, Sydney.
- Weiss, M. (2018). How to become a first mover? Mechanisms of military innovation and the development of drones. European Journal of International Security, 3(2), pp. 187–210. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2017.15." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/eis.2017.15.</a>
- Werin, O., & Wedin, L. (2020). VÅR marin för ett tryggt sverige och ett starkt Europa – Marin Strategi 2030. Kungl Krigsvetenskapsakademin, Stockholm.
- Wibben, A. T. R. (2018). Why we need to study (US) militarism: A critical feminist lens. Security Dialogue, 49(1–2), pp. 136–148. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010617742006." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/0967010617742006.</a>
- Wilcox, L. (2009). Gendering the cult of the offensive. Security Studies, 18(2), pp. 214–240. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410902900152." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/09636410902900152.</a>
- Williams, A. (2015). Defining autonomy in systems: Challenges and solutions. In Williams, A., & Scharre, P. (eds.), Autonomous Systems: Issues for Defence Policymakers. NATO ACT, Norfolk, Virginia, pp. 27–62. Available at https://www.act.nato.int/images/stories/media/capdev/capdev_02.pdf [accessed 15 February, 2021].
Language: English
Page range: 37 - 48
Submitted on: Jun 28, 2021
Accepted on: May 30, 2022
Published on: Sep 14, 2022
Published by: National Defense University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2022 Therese Tärnholm, Hans Liwång, published by National Defense University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.