Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Nuclear warfare beyond counterforce Cover
Open Access
|Oct 2021

References

  1. Caswel, D. J., Howard, R. A., & Pate’-Cornell, M. E. (2011). Analysis of national strategies to counter a country's. Decision Analysis, 8(1), pp. 30–45. doi: 10.1287/deca.1110.0198.
  2. Cimbala, S. J., & McDermott, R. N. (2015). A new cold war? Missile defenses, nuclear arms reductions, and cyber war. Comparative Strategy, 34(1), pp. 95–111. doi: 10.1080/01495933.2015.994405.
  3. Davis, P. K., Wislon, P. A., Kim, J., & Park, J. (2016). Deterrence and stability for the Korean Peninsula. The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 28(1), pp. 1–23.
  4. Department of Defense. (2006). Deterrence Operations Joint Operating Concept. Plans and Policy Directorate, United States Strategic Command. United States Department of Defense, Washngton, DC. Available at https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/concepts/joc_deterrence.pdf?ver=2017-12-28-162015-337.
  5. Ducote, B. M. (2010). Challenging the Application of PMESII-PT in a Complex Environment. Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, KS. Available at https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA523040.
  6. Ewers, R. (2016). Ensuring Strategic Stability In The Second Nuclear Age. Air War College. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Defense Technical Information Center. Available at https://apps.dtic.mil/docs/citations/AD1037271.
  7. Gallagher, M. A., & Sorice, J. E. (2014). Considering alternative nuclear targeting strategies. Comparative Strategy, 33(5), pp. 451–465. doi: 10.1080/01495933.2014.962964.
  8. Gray, C. S. (2007). Nuclear strategy: What is true, what is false, what is arguable. Comparative Strategy, 9(1), 1–32. doi: 10.1080/01495939008402798.
  9. Hartley, D. S. (2015). DIME/PMESII models. In: Conflict and Complexity. Springer, New York, NY, pp. 111–136.
  10. Hefty, K. E., Dickey, T. M., Gallagher, M. A., & Garcia, F. E. (2015). Modeling a nuclear detonation in a conventionl campaign simulation. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulations: Applications, Methodology, Technology, 13(1), pp. 109–117. doi: 10.1177/1548512915588571.
  11. Hillson, R. (2009). The DIME/PMESII Model Suite Requirements Project. Information Technology Division. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC. Available at https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA525056.
  12. Hollerich, J.-C., & Cantu’, O. (2017). Nuclear Disarmament: Seeking Human Security. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Available at http://www.usccb.org/.
  13. Jo, D.-J., & Gartzke, E. (2007). Determinants of nuclear weapons proliferation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(1), pp. 167–194. doi: 10.1177/0022002706296158.
  14. Kristensen, H. M., & Norris, R. S. (2018). Chinese nuclear forces, 2018. Nuclear Notebook, pp. 289–295. doi: 10.1080/00963402.2018.1486620.
  15. Lawrence, J. D., & Murdock, J. L. (2009). Political, Military, Economic, Social, Infrastructure, Information (PMESII) Effects Forecasting for Course of Action (COA) Evaluation. SRI International Incorporated, Menlo Park, CA. Available at https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA501499.
  16. Lieber, K. A., & Press, D. G. (2017). The new era of counterforce: Technological change and the future of nuclear deterrence. International Security, 41(4), 9–49. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00273.
  17. Long, A., & Green, R. (2015). Stalking the secure second strike: intelligence, counterforce, and nuclear strategy. Journal of Strategic Studies, 38, pp. 38–73. doi: 10.1080/01402390.2014.958150.
  18. Lonsdale, D. J. (2019). The 2018 nuclear posture review: A return to nuclear warfighting? Comparative Strategy, 38(2), pp. 98–117. doi: 10.1080/01495933.2019.1573074.
  19. Lowther, A. B., & Cimbala, S. J. (2017). Missile defenses and strategic nuclear arms control: Technology and policy challenges. In: Lowther, A. B., & Cimbala, S. J. (eds.). Defending Why America's Nuclear Modernization Still Matters. Routledge: New York, pp. 127–144.
  20. Martino, J. P. (1988). A Fighting Chance: TheMoral Use of Nuclear-Weapons. Ignatius Press, San Francisco.
  21. Mazarr, M. J. (2007). Beyond counterforce. Comparative Strategy, 9(2), pp. 147–162. doi: 10.1080/01495939008402806.
  22. Mazarr, M. J. (1991). Targeting policy. In: START and the Future of Deterrence. London: Palgrave MacMillian, pp. 77–105.
  23. Mazarr, M. J. (1995). Going just a little nuclear: Nonproliferation lessons from North Korea. International Security, 20(2), pp. 92–122. doi: 10.2307/2539230.
  24. Morgan, F. E., Orletsky, D. T., Henry, R., Molander, R. C., Ratner, E., Reardon, R., et al. (2015). Confronting Emergent Nuclear-Armed Regional Adversaries. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. Available at https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR974.html.
  25. Office of the Secretary of Defense. (2019). 2019 Missile Defense Review. Washington DC. Available at https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Interactive/2018/11-2019-Missile-Defense-Review/The%202019%20MDR_Executive%20Summary.pdf. [accessed 27 August, 2019].
  26. Rauchhaus, R. (2009). Evaluating the nuclear peace hypothesis: A quantitative approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(2), pp. 258–277. doi: 10.1177/0022002708330387.
  27. Sagan, S. D., & Weiner, A. S. (2021). The rule of law and the role of strategy in U.S. nuclear doctrine. International Security, 45(4), pp. 126–166. doi: 10.1162/isec_a_00407.
  28. Talmadge, C. (2017). Would China go nuclear? Assessing the risk of Chinese nuclear escalation in a conventional war with the United States. International Security, 41(4), pp. 50–92. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00274.
  29. Zala, B. (2019). How the next nuclear arms race will be different from the last one. Bullentin of the Atomic Scientists, pp. 36–43. doi: 10.1080/00963402.2019.1555999.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jms-2021-0012 | Journal eISSN: 1799-3350 | Journal ISSN: 2242-3524
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 9
Submitted on: Sep 21, 2019
Accepted on: Apr 20, 2021
Published on: Oct 9, 2021
Published by: National Defense University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Mark Gallagher, Michael Cevallos, published by National Defense University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.