Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Clinical and radiological assessment of joints in people with haemophilia in Assam, Northeast India: a cross-sectional study Cover

Clinical and radiological assessment of joints in people with haemophilia in Assam, Northeast India: a cross-sectional study

Open Access
|Feb 2023

Figures & Tables

A study among PwH attending a clinic in Assam, India, recommends combining clinical and radiological tools (e.g. using HJHS and FISH with HEAD-US) as a cheap and reliable option for assessing joint health consistently in resource-constrained settings
A study among PwH attending a clinic in Assam, India, recommends combining clinical and radiological tools (e.g. using HJHS and FISH with HEAD-US) as a cheap and reliable option for assessing joint health consistently in resource-constrained settings

Figure 1

Distribution of target joints in study participants with severe, moderate and mild factor deficiency (n=57)
Distribution of target joints in study participants with severe, moderate and mild factor deficiency (n=57)

Figure 2

Correlation between Petersson score and Annual Bleeding Rate (ABR) (n=67)
Correlation between Petersson score and Annual Bleeding Rate (ABR) (n=67)

Figure 3

Correlation between Petersson score and age (years) (n=67)
Correlation between Petersson score and age (years) (n=67)

Figure 4

Correlation between Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) and HEAD-US score (n=67)
Correlation between Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) and HEAD-US score (n=67)

Figure 5

Correlation between Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) and Pettersson score (n=67)
Correlation between Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) and Pettersson score (n=67)

Figure 6

Correlation between Functional Independence Score (FISH) and HEAD-US score (n=67)
Correlation between Functional Independence Score (FISH) and HEAD-US score (n=67)

Figure 7

Comparison of mean HEAD-US, FISH, Pettersson and HJHS scores with factor activity level (n=67)
Comparison of mean HEAD-US, FISH, Pettersson and HJHS scores with factor activity level (n=67)

Figure 8

Comparison of mean ABR, AJBR and ATJBR with factor activity level (n=67)
Comparison of mean ABR, AJBR and ATJBR with factor activity level (n=67)

Figure 9

Comparison of mean age, ABR, number of target joints, FISH and HJHS in inhibitor and non-inhibitor groups (n=67)
Comparison of mean age, ABR, number of target joints, FISH and HJHS in inhibitor and non-inhibitor groups (n=67)

Participant demographics (n=67)

NUMBER (N)PERCENTAGE (%)
Age
12–193146.27%
20–292537.31%
30–39811.94%
40–4934.48%
>5000
Gender
Male6597.01%
Female22.99%
Haemophilia type
Haemophilia A5785.07%
Haemophilia B913.43%
Acquired haemophilia11.49%
Haemophilia severity*
Severe3856.72%
  Haemophilia A3247.76%
  Haemophilia B68.96%
Moderate1116.42%
  Haemophilia A913.43%
  Haemophilia B22.99%
Mild1725.37%
  Haemophilia A1623.88%
  Haemophilia B11.49%

Mean and median values of HEAD-US, Pettersson, FISH and HJHS scores and annual bleed rate (ABR) in study participants with severe, moderate and mild factor deficiency (n=67)

SEVERE HAEMOPHILIAMODERATE HAEMOPHILIAMILD HAEMOPHILIA
MeanMedianSDRange.MeanMedianSDRange.MeanMedianSDRange.
HEAD-US7.426.505.0170–253.092.002.590–81.001.001.060–3
Pettersson11.5310.508.010–395.363.005.140–181.592.001.660–5
FISH23.9524.004.554–3228.0929.002.9522–3229.6530.002.8722–32
HJHS18.7616.0011.570–5910.826.0012.820–463.882.006.210–24
ABR18.7115.5011.982–506.366.004.060–125.445.003.371–12
Language: English
Page range: 11 - 19
Published on: Feb 23, 2023
Published by: Haemnet Ltd
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Bhabani Sankar Dhal, Anupam Dutta, Arijit Das, Dhrubajyoti Borpatragohain, Adity Sharma, Arnav Kashyap, published by Haemnet Ltd
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.