Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Abusive School Leadership Practices and Teacher Dissenting Voices: Analysis through Nancy Fraser and Miranda Fricker

Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Arar, K. (2020). School Leadership for Refugees’ Education: Social Justice Leadership for Immigrant, Migrants and Refugees. Routledge.
  2. Bashshur, M. R., & Oc, B. (2015). When voice matters: A multilevel review of the impact of voice in organizations. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1530–1554.
  3. Beachum, F.D., Gullo, G.L. (2020). School Leadership: Implicit Bias and Social Justice. In: Papa, R. (eds) Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education. Springer, Cham
  4. Bogotch, I (2022). Educational leadership and social justice: Practice into theory. Journal of School Leadership, 12, 138–156
  5. Cazden, C. B. (2012). A framework for social justice in education. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 1(3), 178–198.
  6. Cazden, C. B. (2017). A framework for social justice in education. In Communicative competence, classroom interaction, and educational equity (pp. 245–258). Routledge.
  7. Dahl, H. M., Stoltz, P., & Willig, R. (2004). Recognition, redistribution and representation in capitalist global society: An interview with Nancy Fraser. Acta Sociologica, 47(4), 374–382.
  8. Drago-Severson, E., & Blum-DeStefano, J. (2019). A developmental lens on social justice leadership: Exploring the connection between meaning making and practice. Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, 3(1), 1.
  9. Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D., & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 331–351.
  10. Fischer, T., Tian, A. W., Lee, A., & Hughes, D. J. (2021). Abusive supervision: a systematic review and fundamental rethink. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(6), 101540.
  11. Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, 3 (MayJune), 1–8. Retrieved from http://newleftreview.org/II/3/nancyfraser-rethinking-recognition.
  12. Fraser, N. (2003). Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, and participation. In N. Fraser & A. Honneth, Redistribution, or recognition? A political philosophical exchange (pp. 1–99). London: Verso.
  13. Fricker, M. (2008). On Miranda Fricker’s Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing: Précis. THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia, 23(1), 69–71.
  14. Fricker, M. (2018). Epistemic injustice and recognition theory: a new conversation—afterword. Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 4(4).
  15. Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. Advances in organizational justice, 1(1–55), 12.
  16. Gewirtz, S. (1998). Conceptualizing social justice in education: Mapping the territory. Journalof Education Policy, 13, 469–484
  17. Goldfarb, K. P., & Grinberg, J. (2002). Leadership for social justice: Authentic participation in the case of a community center in Caracas, Venezuela. Journal of School Leadership,12, 157–173.
  18. Hoobler, J., & Brass, D. (2006). Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1125–1133
  19. Huh, E., & Lee, E. S. (2021). Can abusive supervision create positive work engagement? The interactive moderating role of positive causal attribution and workplace friendship. Management Decision.
  20. Ju, D., Huang, M., Liu, D., Qin, X., Hu, Q., & Chen, C. (2019). Supervisory consequences of abusive supervision: An investigation of sense of power, managerial self-efficacy, and task-oriented leadership behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 154, 80–95.
  21. Keashly, L., Trott, V., & MacLean, L. M. (1994). Abusive behavior in the workplace: A preliminary investigation. Violence and Victims, 9, 341–357.
  22. Khattak, P., & Rizvi, S. T. H. (2021). The effect of abusive supervision and psychopathy on counter productive work behavior: The role of psychological capital. NICE Research Journal, 1–26.
  23. Khumalo, S. S. (2019). Analyzing abusive school leadership practices through the lens of social justice. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(4), 546–555
  24. Liou, D. D., & Liang, J. G. (2021). Toward a theory of sympathetic leadership: Asian American school administrators’ expectations for justice and excellence. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(3), 403–436.
  25. Mackey, J. D., Frieder, R. E., Brees, J. R., & Martinko, M. J. (2017). Abusive Supervision: A Meta-Analysis and Empirical Review. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1940–1965.
  26. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice (Revised ed.). Belknap Press of Harvard University Pres
  27. Saleem, H. (2015). The impact of leadership styles on job satisfaction and mediating role of perceived organizational politics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 563–569.
  28. Shoho, A. R., Merchant, B. M., & Lugg, C. A. (2005). Social justice: Seeking a common language. In F. W. English (Ed.), The Sage handbook of educational leadership: Advances in theory, research and practice (pp. 47–67). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  29. Ng, T. W. (2017). Transformational leadership and performance outcomes: Analyses of multiple mediation pathways. The leadership quarterly, 28(3), 385–417.
  30. Tepper BJ. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43:178–90
  31. Tepper, BJ. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management. 33 (3), 261–89
  32. Tepper, B. J., Simon, L., & Park, H. M. (2017). Abusive supervision. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 123–152.
  33. Theoharis, G. (2007). Social justice educational leaders and resistance: Toward a theory of social justice leadership. Educational administration quarterly, 43(2), 221–258.
  34. Tribe, R., & Bell, D. (2018). Social justice, diversity and leadership. The European Journal of Counselling Psychology, 7(1), 111–125.
  35. Wang, F. (2018). Social justice leadership—Theory and practice: A case of Ontario. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(3), 470–498.
  36. Webster, L., & Mertova, P. (2007). Using narrative inquiry as a research method: An introduction to using critical event narrative analysis in research on learning and teaching. Routledge.
  37. Xu, E., Huang, X., Lam, C. K. & Miao, Q. (2012). Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 531–543
  38. Yao, Y. H., Li, Y. F. & Xia, D. (2014). The Study on the Impact of Abusive Supervision of Leaders on Employees’ Innovation Behavior. Chinese Journal of Management, 11, 1177–1183.
  39. Zhang, Y., Goddard, J. T. & Jakubiec, B. A. E. (2018). Social justice leadership in education: A suggested questionnaire. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 3 (1), 53–86.
  40. Zhang, Y., & Liao, Z. (2015). Consequences of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review. Asia Pacific journal of management, 32(4), 959–987.
Language: English
Page range: 15 - 28
Published on: Dec 6, 2023
Published by: Valahia University of Targoviste
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2023 Shuti Steph Khumalo, published by Valahia University of Targoviste
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.