Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Pathways to school improvement: Discovering network patterns of school principals Cover

Pathways to school improvement: Discovering network patterns of school principals

Open Access
|Aug 2024

References

  1. Adjapong, E. S., Emdin, C., & Levy, I. (2018). Virtual professional learning network: Exploring an educational twitter chat as professional development. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 20(2), 24–39.
  2. Anderson, M. (2017). Transformational leadership in education: A review of existing literature. International Social Science Review, 93(1), 1–13.
  3. Armstrong, E. G., & Barsion, S. J. (2013). Creating “innovator’s DNA” in health care education. Academic Medicine, 88(3), 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318280cb7b
  4. Azorín, C. (2020). Beyond COVID-19 supernova. Is another education coming? Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4), 381-390.
  5. Beauchamp, G., Hulme, M., Clarke, L., Hamilton, L., & Harvey, J. A. (2021). ‘People miss people’: A study of school leadership and management in the four nations of the United Kingdom in the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 375–392.
  6. Bernhardt, V. L. (2018). Data analysis for continuous school improvement (4th Ed.). Routledge.
  7. Bickmore, D. L., Gonzales, M. M., & Roberts, M. B. (2021). Exploring school leaders communities of practice and school improvement. NASSP Bulletin, 105(3), 173–191.
  8. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (2022). Lessons from Networks for School Improvement: School Year 2020–2021. Retrieved from: https://usprogram.gatesfoundation.org/-/media/usp/usp-resources/k12-resources/gatesfoundation_nsibrief-finalpdf.pdf
  9. Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organisational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00087-4
  10. Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organisation Science, 22(5), 1168–1181. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0641
  11. Boudett, K. P., City, E. A., & Murnane, R. J. (Eds.). (2020). Data wise, revised and expanded edition: A step-by-step guide to using assessment results to improve teaching and learning. Harvard Education Press.
  12. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
  13. Carolan, B. (2013). Social network analysis and education: Theory, methods & applications. SAGE Publications.
  14. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  15. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. https://www.crcresearch.org/files-crcresearch/File/coleman_88.pdf
  16. Cullen-Lester, K. L., Maupin, C. K., & Carter, D. R. (2017). Incorporating social networks into leadership development: A conceptual model and evaluation of research and practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 130–152.
  17. Daghfous, A. (2004). Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge-intensive best practices. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 69(2), 21–27.
  18. Daniëls, E., Hondeghem, A., & Dochy, F. (2019). A review on leadership and leadership development in educational settings. Educational Research Review, 27, 110–125.
  19. Daly, A. J., & Finnigan, K. S. (2010). A bridge between worlds: Understanding network structure to understand change strategy. Journal of Educational Change, 11(2), 111–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9102-5
  20. Daly, A. J., & Finnigan, K. S. (2011). The ebb and flow of social network ties between district leaders under high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 39–79. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210368990
  21. Daly, A. J., Liou, Y. H., & Moolenaar, N. M. (2014). The principal connection: Trust and innovative climate in a network of reform. In Trust and School Life (pp. 285–311). Springer.
  22. Daly, A. J., & Moolenaar, N. M. (2011). Leadership and social networks. Social Network Encyclopedia, 1–5.
  23. Demir, E. K. (2021). The role of social capital for teacher professional learning and student achievement: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 33, 100391.
  24. DiPaola, M. F., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2005). Bridging or buffering? The impact of schools’ adaptive strategies on student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(1), 60–71.
  25. Dyer, J., Gregersen, H., & Christensen, C. M. (2019). The innovator’s DNA, updated, with a new preface: Mastering the five skills of disruptive innovators. Harvard Business Press.
  26. Evans, M. P., & Stone-Johnson, C. (2010). Internal leadership challenges of network participation. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 13(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120903288405
  27. Fancera, S. F. (2020). School leadership for professional development: The role of social media and networks. Professional Development in Education, 46(4), 664–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1629615
  28. Ferguson, D. M., Jablokow, K. W., Ohland, M. W., & Purzer, Ş. (2017). Identifying the characteristics of engineering innovativeness. Engineering Studies, 9(1), 45–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2017.1312419
  29. Flatten, T., Adams, D., & Brettel, M. (2015). Fostering absorptive capacity through leadership: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of World Business, 50(3), 519–534.
  30. Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers’ College Press.
  31. Fullan, M. (2023). The principal 2.0: Three keys to maximising impact. John Wiley & Sons.
  32. Gibson, C., Hardy, J. H., & Buckley, M. R. (2014). Understanding the role of networking in organisations. Career Development International, 19(2), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-09-2013-0111
  33. Gonzales, M. M., & Roberts, M. B. (2021). Leading multiple schools: An examination of franchise model school principals. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–16.
  34. Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociology Theory, 1(April), 201–233. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0641
  35. Green, T. L. (2018). School as community, community as school: Examining principal leadership for urban school reform and community development. Education and Urban Society, 50(2), 111–135.
  36. Grissom, J. A., Egalite, A. J., & Lindsay, C. A. (2021). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. The Wallace Foundation.
  37. Guzman, J. (2022). Stakeholders’ participation in school improvement plan and school performance of secondary schools. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 3(July Special Issue), 51–66.
  38. Hadfield, M., Jopling, M., Noden, C., O’Leary, D., & Stott, A. (2006). What does the existing knowledge base tell us about the impact of networking and collaboration? A review of network-based innovations in education in the UK. National College for School Leadership.
  39. Hajisoteriou, C., & Angelides, P. (2014). Facing the ‘challenge’: School leadership in intercultural schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(4), 65–82.
  40. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2016). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
  41. Hargreaves, A., Boyle, A., & Harris, A. (2014). Uplifting leadership: How organisations, teams, and communities raise performance. John Wiley & Sons.
  42. Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172–187.
  43. Harris, A., Azorín, C., & Jones, M. (2023). Network leadership: A new educational imperative? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 26(5), 919–935.
  44. Ismail, A., & Mydin, A. A. (2019, March). The impact of transformational leadership and commitment on teachers’ innovative behaviour. In 4th ASEAN Conference on Psychology, Counselling, and Humanities (ACPCH 2018) (pp. 426–430). Atlantis Press.
  45. Jefferson, M., & Anderson, M. (2017). Transforming schools: Creativity, critical reflection, communication, collaboration. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  46. Ji, Y., & Bai, Y. (2018). Innovation capacity and entrepreneurial intention: The moderating effects of entrepreneurial atmosphere. The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 20(1), 68–84
  47. Johansson, F. (2006). Medici effect: What you can learn from elephants and epidemics. Harvard Business Press.
  48. Jones, M., & Harris, A. (2014). Principals leading successful organisational change: Building social capital through disciplined professional collaboration. Journal of Organisational Change Management, 27, 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-07-2013-0116
  49. Kaplan, L. S. (2015). Introduction to the principalship: Theory to practice. Routledge.
  50. Keuning, T., Geel, M. V., Visscher, A., Fox, J. P., & Moolenaar, N. M. (2016). The transformation of schools’ social networks during a data-based decision-making reform. Teachers College Record, 118(9), 1–33.
  51. Kirtman, L., & Fullan, M. (2016). Key competencies for whole-system change. Solution Tree Press.
  52. Leithwood, K. (2019). Characteristics of effective leadership networks: A replication and extension. School Leadership & Management, 39(2), 175–197.
  53. Leithwood, K., & Azah, V. N. (2016). Characteristics of effective leadership networks. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(4), 409–433.
  54. Lin, N. (1982). Social resources and instrumental action. In P. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 131–145). SAGE Publications.
  55. Lin, N. (1988). Social resources and social mobility: A structural theory of status attainment. In R. Breiger (Ed.), Social mobility and social structure. Cambridge University Press.
  56. Lockton, M. (2019). Chasing joint work: Administrators’ efforts to structure teacher collaboration. School Leadership & Management, 39(5), 496–518.
  57. Mendenhall, A. N., Iachini, A., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2013). Exploring stakeholder perceptions of facilitators and barriers to implementation of an expanded school improvement model. Children & Schools, 35(4), 225–234.
  58. Meyers, C. V., & VanGronigen, B. A. (2019). A lack of authentic school improvement plan development. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(3), 261–278.
  59. Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., & Sleegers, P. J. (2010). Occupying the principal position: Examining relationships between transformational leadership, social network position, and schools’ innovative climate. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 623–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10378689
  60. Moolenaar, N. M., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2015). The networked principal: Examining principals’ social relationships and transformational leadership in school and district networks. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(1), 8–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2014-0031
  61. Moolenaar, N. M., Sleegers, P. J. C., & Daly, A. J. (2012). Teaming up: Linking collaboration networks, collective efficacy, and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.001
  62. Muijs, D. (2015a). Collaboration and networking among rural schools: Can it work and when? Evidence from England. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(2), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2015.1022386
  63. Muijs, D. (2015b). Improving schools through collaboration: A mixed methods study of school-to-school partnerships in the primary sector. Oxford Review of Education, 41(5), 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1047824
  64. Muijs, D., West, M., & Ainscow, M. (2010). Why network? Theoretical perspectives on networking. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450903569692
  65. Oddone, K., Hughes, H., & Lupton, M. (2019). Teachers as connected professionals: A model to support professional learning through personal learning networks. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4082
  66. Porter, A. L., Portillo, E. C., Gallimore, C. E., Zorek, J. A., & Barnett, S. G. (2020). Let external stakeholders be your guide to curricular revision. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(8), ajpe8021
  67. Silva, M., da Silva, S. M., & Araújo, H. C. (2017). Networking in education: From concept to action – An analytical view on the educational territories of priority intervention (TEIP) in Northern Portugal. Improving Schools, 20(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216658566
  68. Stewart, V. (2012). A world-class education: Learning from international models of excellence and innovation. ASCD.
  69. Tobar-Muñoz, H., G. Cárcamo, J., Solarte, H., Ventes, C., & H. Mesa, J. (2020). Videogames and innovation: Fostering innovators’ skills in online-learning environments. Sustainability, 12(21), 9264.
  70. Torres, D. G. (2019). Distributed leadership, professional collaboration, and teachers’ job satisfaction in US schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 111–123.
  71. United States Department of Education. (2020). School improvement grants. Retrieved from: https://www2.ed.gov/programs/sif/index.html
  72. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  73. Walker, M.E., Wasserman, S., & Wellman, B.(1994). Statistical Models for Social Support Networks. In J. Galaskiewicz & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Social Psychology and Diffusion (53–72). SAGE Publications.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jelpp-2024-0001 | Journal eISSN: 1178-8704 | Journal ISSN: 1178-8690
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 21
Published on: Aug 1, 2024
Published by: New Zealand Educational Administration and Leadership Society
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Miguel M. Gonzales, Tiber Garza, Elizabeth Leon-Zaragoza, published by New Zealand Educational Administration and Leadership Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.