Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Money-in-the-Utility-Function: Model Simulations and Money Demand Estimation in the Case of the Republic of Macedonia Cover

Money-in-the-Utility-Function: Model Simulations and Money Demand Estimation in the Case of the Republic of Macedonia

South East European Journal of Economics and Business
Volume 9 (2014): Issue 2 (December 2014)
By: Mile Ivanov,  Mihail Petkovski and  Elena Naumovska  
Open Access
|Mar 2015

References

  1. Andres, J. D., Lopez-Salido, J. D., Valles, J. 2006. Money in an Estimated Business Cycle Model of the Euro Area. The Economic Journal 116 (511): 457-477.10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01088.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Babic, A. 2000. The monthly transaction money demand in Croatia. Croatian National Bank Working paper W-5, Zagreb, Croatia: Croatian National Bank.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Brooks, C. 2002. Introductory Econometrics for Finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Brzoza-Brzenina, M. 2011. Money in the utility model. Class Lecture from Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Buch, C. M. 2001. Money demand in Hungary and Poland. Applied Economics 33(8): 989-999.10.1080/00036840122107
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Cagan, P. 1972. The Channels of monetary effects on interest rates. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Chen, S. 2007. Evidence of the long-run neutrality of money: the case of South Korea and Taiwan. Economics Bulletin 3: 1-18.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Chowdhury, A. R. 1994. Factors determining the income velocity of money in a developing economy. Applied Economics Letters 1(4): 58-62.10.1080/135048594358221
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Colley, T. F. and LeRoy, S. F. 1985. Atheoretical Macroeconometrics: A Critique. Journal of Monetary Economics 16: 283-308.10.1016/0304-3932(85)90038-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Crowder, W. J. and Sonora, R.J. 2002. Intra-National Evidence of the Fisher Effect. Working Paper, Arlington, TX: University of Texas at Arlington.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Cziraky, D. and Gillman, M. 2006. Money Demand in an EU Accession Country: A VECM Study of Croatia. Bulletin of Economic Research 58(2): 105-127.10.1111/j.0307-3378.2006.00237.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Dickey, D. A. and Fuller, W. A. 1979. Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74 (366): 427-431.10.2307/2286348
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Dobnik, F. 2011. Long-run Money Demand in OECD Countries: Cross-Member Cointegration. Ruhr Economic Papers 237: 1-29.10.2139/ssrn.1753661
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Dreger, C., Reimers, H. and Roffia, B. 2007. Long-Run Money Demand in the New EU Member States with Exchange Rate Effects. Eastern European Economics 45(2): 75-94.10.2753/EEE0012-8775450204
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Enders, W. 2009. Applied Econometric Time Series. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Fetai, B. 2008. Optimal strategy of monetary and fiscal policy in function of maintaining macroeconomics stability in the Republic of Macedonia, Ph.D Diss., University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Fidrmuc, J. 2009. Money Demand and Disinflation in Selected CEECs during the Accession to the EU. Applied Economics 41(10): 1259-1267.10.1080/00036840601019323
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Fisher, M. E. and Seater. J. J. 1993. Long Run Neutrality and Superneutrality in an ARIMA Framework. American Economic Review 83: 402-415.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Friedman, M. 1968. The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review 57: 1-17.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Geweke, J. F. 1986. The Superneutrality of Money in the United States: An Interpretation of the Evidence. Econometrica 54(1): 1-21.10.2307/1914154
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Hafer, R.W. and Jansen, D. W. 1991. The demand for money in the United States: evidence from cointegration tests. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 23(2):155-168.10.2307/1992774
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Heer, B. 2004. Non-superneutrality of money in the Sidrauski model with heterogeneous agents. Economics Bulletin 5(8): 1-6.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Hsing, Y. 2007. Impacts of Financial Stock Prices and Exchange Rates on the Demand for Money in Poland. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 2 (1): 7-1310.2478/v10033-007-0010-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Ireland, P. N. 2004. Money’s Role In The Monetary Business Cycle. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 36(6): 969-983.10.1353/mcb.2005.0010
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Judd, P .J. and Motley, B. 1984. The Great velocity decline of 1982:1983: a comparative analysis of M1 and M2. Economic Review Number 3, San Francisco, California: Federal Bank of San Francisco.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. King, R. and Watson, W. M. 1992. Testing Long Run Neutrality, NBER Working Papers 4156, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w4156
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Kjosevski, J. 2013. The Determinants and Stability of Money Demand in the Republic of Macedonia. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci, časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu - Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, Journal of Economics and Business 31(1): 35-54.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Kollarova, V. and Carsky, R. 2007. The estimation of money demand in the Slovak Republik. Biatec 15(8): 1-8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Komarek, L. and Melecky, M. 2001. Demand for Money in the Transition Economy: The Case of the Czech Republic 1993-2001. The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series 614, Coventry, UK: University of Warwick.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Kydland, F. E. and Prescott, E. C. 1982. Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations. Econometrica 50(6): 1345-1370.10.2307/1913386
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Mulligan, C.B. and Sala-I-Martin, X. 1992. U.S Money Demand: surprising cross-sectional Estimates. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2: 285-343. National bank of the Republic of Macedonia, 2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Methodological explanations: Monetary and interest rates statistics, Skopje, Macedonia: NBRM.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Nell, K. S. 1999. The Stability of Money Demand in South Africa, 1965-1997. Studies in Economics 9905, Canterbury, Kent: University of Kent.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Payne, J. 2003. Post stabilization estimates of money demand in Croatia: error correction model using the bounds testing approach. Applied Economics 35(16): 1723-1727.10.1080/0003684032000152871
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Petkovska, B. 2008. Estimation of the investment function for the Republic of Macedonia. NBRM Working Paper, Skopje: National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Petrevski, G. and Jovanovski, K. 2010. Demand for money in Macedonia. South East Europe Review for Labour and Social Affairs Vol. 13(1): 121-136.10.5771/1435-2869-2010-1-121
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Phillips, P. C. B. and Perron, P. 1988. Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika 75 (2): 335-346.10.1093/biomet/75.2.335
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Schabert, A. and Stoltenberg, C. 2005. Money Demand and Macroeconomic Stability Revisited. Working Paper Series 0458, Frankfurt: European Central Bank.10.2139/ssrn.677437
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Sriram, S.S. 1999. Survey of literature on demand for money: theoretical and empirical work with special reference to Error-Correction models. IMF Working paper WP/99/64, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.10.5089/9781451848540.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Sidrauski, M. 1967. Rational choice and patterns of growth in a monetary economy. The American Economic Review 57(2): 534-544.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Siliverstovs, B. 2008. Dynamic modelling of the demand for money in Latvia. Baltic Journal of Economics 8(1): 53-74.10.1080/1406099X.2008.10840445
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Siliverstovs, B. 2007. Money Demand in Estonia. Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 675, Berlin: German Institute for Economic Research.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Skrabic, B., Tomic-Plazibat, N. 2009. Evidence of the Longrun Equilibrium between Money Demand Determinants in Croatia. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences 4(16): 1177-1181.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Slavova, S. 2003. Money demand during hyperinflation and stabilization: Bulgaria, 1991-2000. Applied Economics 35(11): 1303-1316.10.1080/003684032000095398
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Stock, J. H. and Watson, M. W. 1989. Interpreting the evidence on money-income causality. Journal of Econometrics 40(1): 161-181.10.1016/0304-4076(89)90035-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Telatar, E. and Cavusoglu, T. 2005. Long-Run Monetary Neutrality: Evidence from High Inflation Countries. Ekonomicky časopis - Economic Journal 9: 895-910.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Tillers, I.2004. Money demand in Latvia. Working paper 3/2004, Riga, Latvia: Bank of Latvia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Uhlig, H. 1995. A toolkit for analyzing nonlinear dynamic stochastic models easily. Discussion Paper 1091, Minneapolis, MN: Federal Reserve bank of Minneapolis.10.21034/dp.101
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Valadkhani, A. and Alludin, M. 2003. Demand for M2 in developing countries: An empirical panel investigation. Discussion papers 149, Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Wallace, F. H. 1999. Long Run Neutrality of Money in the Mexican Economy. Applied Economics Letters 6: 637-40.10.1080/135048599352402
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Wallace, F. H. 2005. Long Run Money Neutrality: The Case of Guatemala. Revista Latinoamericana de Desarrollo Economico 5: 127-138.10.35319/lajed.20055255
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Walsh, C. 2010. Monetary Theory and Policy, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Weber, A.A. 1994. Testing Long-Run Neutrality: Empirical Evidence for G-7 Countries with Special Emphasis on Germany. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 41:67-117.10.1016/0167-2231(94)00014-X
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Wong, M.C.S. 2013. Dynamic optimization: An introduction, Houston, TX: University of Houston.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jeb-2014-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2233-1999
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 7 - 20
Published on: Mar 13, 2015
Published by: University of Sarajevo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
money- in-the-utility function,
demand for money,
cointegration
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Political economics, other,
Business management,
Business management, other

© 2015 Mile Ivanov, Mihail Petkovski, Elena Naumovska, published by University of Sarajevo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 9 (2014): Issue 2 (December 2014)Next article