References
- Barjak, F. (2006). The role of the Internet in informal scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10), 1350-1367. DOI: 10.1002/asi.20454
- Bhardwaj, R. K. (2017). Academic social networking sites: Comparative analysis of ResearchGate, Academia.edu, Mendeley and Zotero. Information and Learning Science, 118(5/6), 298-316. DOI: 10.1108/ils-03-2017-0012
- Borrego, Á. (2017). Institutional repositories versus ResearchGate: The depositing habits of Spanish researchers. Learned publishing, 30(3), 185-192. DOI: 10.1002/leap.1099
- Copiello, S. (2019). Research Interest: Another undisclosed (and redundant) algorithm by ResearchGate. Scientometrics, 120(1), 351-360. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03124-w
- Copiello, S., & Bonifaci, P. (2018). A few remarks on ResearchGate score and academic reputation. Scientometrics, 114(1), 301-306. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2582-9
- Copiello, S., & Bonifaci, P. (2019). ResearchGate Score, full-text research items, and full-text reads: A follow-up study. Scientometrics, 119(2), 1255-1262. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03063-6
- Ebrahimzadeh, S., Rezaei Sharifabadi, S., Karbala Aghaie Kamran, M., & Dalkir, K. (2020). Triggers and strategies related to the collaborative information-seeking behaviour of researchers in ResearchGate. Online Information Review, 44 (5), 1077-1096. DOI: 10.1108/oir-12-2019-0380
- Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2015). Errors in DOI indexing by bibliometric databases. Scientometrics, 102(3), 2181-2186. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1503-4
- Garvey, W. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1972). Communication and information processing within scientific disciplines: Empirical findings for psychology. Information Storage and Retrieval, 8, 123-136. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-023344-4.50011-8
- Hammarfelt, B., de Rijcke, S., & Rushforth, A. D. (2016). Quantified academic selves: The gamification of research through social networking services. Information Research, 21(2). Retrieved from https://informationr.net/ir/21-2/SM1.html
- Huang, M. H., & Chang, Y. W. (2008). Characteristics of research output in social sciences and humanities: From a research evaluation perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1819-1828. DOI: 10.1002/asi.20885
- Jamali, H. R. (2017). Copyright compliance and infringement in ResearchGate full-text journal articles. Scientometrics, 112(1), 241-254. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2291-4
- Jeng, W., DesAutels, S., He, D., & Li, L. (2017). Information exchange on an academic social networking site: A multidiscipline comparison on ResearchGate Q&A. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 638-652. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23692
- Jordan, K. (2014). Academics and their social networks: Exploring the role of academic social networking sites. First Monday, 19(11). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v19i11.4937
- Jordan, K. (2019). From social networks to publishing platforms: A review of the history and scholarship of academic social network site. Frontiers in Digital Humanities, 6. DOI: 10.3389/fdigh.2019.00005
- Khurana, P., Ganesan, G., Kumar, G., & Sharma, K. (2023). A bibliometric analysis to unveil the impact of digital object identifiers (DOI) on bibliometric indicators. In Singh, P. K., Wierzchoń, S. T., Tanwar, S., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., Ganzha, M. (Eds). Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (pp. 859-869). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-1142-2_67
- Kirilova, S., & Zoepfl, F. (2025). Metrics fraud on ResearchGate. Journal of Informetrics, 19(1). DOI: 10.1016/j. joi.2024.101604
- Konkiel, S. (2014). Is ResearchGate’s new DOI feature a game-changer?. OurResearch blog. Retrieved from https://blog.ourresearch.org/researchgate-doi
- Kraker, P., & Lex, E. (2015). A critical look at the ResearchGate score as a measure of scientific reputation. Proceedings of the quantifying and analysing scholarly communication on the web workshop (ASCW’15). Retrieved from https://zenodo.org/records/35401
- Lee, J., Oh, S., Dong, H., Wang, F., & Burnett, G. (2019). Motivations for self‐archiving on an academic social networking site: A study on ResearchGate. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(6), 563-574. DOI: 10.1002/asi.24138
- Lepori, B., Thelwall, M., & Hoorani, B. H. (2018). Which US and European Higher Education Institutions are visible in ResearchGate and what affects their RG score?. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 806-818. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.07.001
- Li, L., He, D., Zhang, C., Geng, L., & Zhang, K. (2018). Characterizing peer-judged answer quality on academic Q&A sites: A cross-disciplinary case study on ResearchGate. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(3), 269-287. DOI: 10.1108/ajim-11-2017-0246
- Liu, X. Z., & Fang, H. (2018). Which academic papers do researchers tend to feature on ResearchGate?. Information Research, 23(1). Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/23-1/paper785.html
- Manca, S. (2018). ResearchGate and Academia. edu as networked socio-technical systems for scholarly communication: A literature review. Research in Learning Technology, 26. DOI: 10.25304/rlt.v26.2008
- Martín-Martín, A., Orduña-Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Author-level metrics in the new academic profile platforms: The online behaviour of the Bibliometrics community. Journal of informetrics, 12(2), 494-509.
- Mason, S., & Sakurai, Y. (2021). A ResearchGate-way to an international academic community?. Scientometrics, 126(2), 1149-1171. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03772-3
- Meier, A., & Tunger, D. (2018). Survey on opinions and usage patterns for the ResearchGate platform. Plos One, 13(10). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204945
- Mikki, S., Zygmuntowska, M., Gjesdal, Ø. L., & Al Ruwehy, H. A. (2015). Digital presence of Norwegian scholars on academic network sites – where and who are they?. PloS One, 10(11). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142709
- Muscanell, N., & Utz, S. (2017). Social networking for scientists: an analysis on how and why academics use ResearchGate. Online information review, 41(5), 744-759. DOI: 10.1108/oir-07-2016-0185
- Nicholas, D., Clark, D., & Herman, E. (2016a). ResearchGate: reputation uncovered. Learned Publishing, 29(3), 173-182. DOI: 10.1002/leap.1035
- Nicholas, D., Herman, E., & Clark, D. (2016b). Scholarly Reputation Building: How does ResearchGate Fare?. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, 6(2). Retrieved from https://journals.sfu.ca/ijkcdt/index.php/ijkcdt/article/view/85
- Nicholas, D., Herman, E., Jamali, H., Rodríguez‐Bravo, B., Boukacem‐Zeghmouri, C., Dobrowolski, T., & Pouchot, S. (2015). New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation. Learned Publishing, 28(3), 169-183. DOI: 10.1087/20150303
- Orduna-Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2017). Performance behavior patterns in author-level metrics: A disciplinary comparison of Google Scholar Citations, ResearchGate, and ImpactStory. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 2. DOI: 10.3389/frma.2017.00014
- Orduña-Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2020). ResearchGate and the Academic Social Network Sites: New Environments for New Bibliometrics?. In Ball, R. (ed.). Handbook Bibliometrics (pp. 265-280). De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110646610-027
- Orduna-Malea, E., Martin-Martin, A., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2016). ResearchGate as a source for scientific evaluation: Revealing its bibliometric applications. Profesional de la información, 25(2), 303-310. DOI: 10.3145/epi.2016.mar.18
- Orduna-Malea, E., Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2017). Do ResearchGate Scores create ghost academic reputations?. Scientometrics, 112(1), 443-460. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2396-9
- Ortega, J. L. (2015). Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites: The case of CSIC’s members. Journal of informetrics, 9(1), 39-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.004
- Ortega, J. L. (2016). Social network sites for scientists: A quantitative survey. Chandos. DOI: 10.1016/c2015-0-00021-1
- Ortega, J. L. (2017). Towards a homogenization of academic social sites: A longitudinal study of profiles in Academia.edu, Google Scholar Citations and ResearchGate. Online Information Review, 41(6), 812-825. DOI: 10.1108/oir-01-2016-0012
- Petersen, A. M., Fortunato, S., Pan, R. K., Kaski, K., Penner, O., Rungi, A., Riccaboni, R., Stanley, H. E., & Pammolli, F. (2014). Reputation and impact in academic careers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(43), 15316-15321. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1323111111
- Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC methods programme. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.1018.4643
- Priem, J. (2013). Beyond the paper. Nature, 495(7442), 437-440. DOI: 10.1038/495437a
- Prieto-Gutierrez, J. J. (2019). Ten years of research on ResearchGate: A scoping review using Google Scholar (2008-2017). European Science Editing, 45(3), 60-64. DOI: 10.20316/ese.2019.45.18023
- Raffaghelli, J. E., & Manca, S. (2023). Exploring the social activity of open research data on ResearchGate: Implications for the data literacy of researchers. Online Information Review, 47(1), 197-217. DOI: 10.1108/oir-05-2021-0255
- ResearchGate (2014, August 13). Celebrating five million members with free DOIs [Web blog]. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/blog/post/celebrating-five-million-members-with-free-dois
- ResearchGate (2021, April 12). Science hasn’t slowed, it’s just moved online: How the COVID-19 pandemic continues to change how research is happening in 2021[Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=klTF5yK7rxU
- Silagadze, Z. K. (2023). On arXiv moderation system. Journal of Informetrics, 17(3). DOI: 10.1016/j. joi.2023.101433
- Singh, V. K., Srichandan, S. S., & Lathabai, H. H. (2022). ResearchGate and Google Scholar: How much do they differ in publications, citations and different metrics and why?. Scientometrics, 127(3), 1515-1542. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04264-2
- Tennant, J. P., & Ross-Hellauer, T. (2020). The limitations to our understanding of peer review. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 5. DOI: 10.1186/s41073-020-00092-1
- Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2017a). ResearchGate articles: Age, discipline, audience size, and impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(2), 468-479. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23675
- Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2017b). ResearchGate versus Google Scholar: Which finds more early citations?. Scientometrics, 112(2), 1125-1131. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2400-4
- Van Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: scientists and the social network. Nature, 512(7513), 126-129. DOI: 10.1038/512126a
- Van Noorden, R. (2017). Publishers threaten to remove millions of papers from ResearchGate. Nature News. DOI: 10.1038/nature.2017.22793
- Vera-Baceta, M. A., Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2019). Web of Science and Scopus language coverage. Scientometrics, 121(3), 1803-1813. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03264-z
- Xu, S., Hao, L., An, X., Zhai, D., & Pang, H. (2019). Types of DOI errors of cited references in Web of Science with a cleaning method. Scientometrics, 120(3), 1427-1437. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03162-4
- Yan, W., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Research universities on the ResearchGate social networking site: An examination of institutional differences, research activity level, and social networks formed. Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 385-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.002
- Yan, W., Zhang, Y., & Bromfield, W. (2018). Analyzing the follower–followee ratio to determine user characteristics and institutional participation differences among research universities on ResearchGate. Scientometrics, 115(1), 299-316. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2637-6
- Yan, W., Zhang, Y., Hu, T., & Kudva, S. (2021). How does scholarly use of academic social networking sites differ by academic discipline? A case study using ResearchGate. Information Processing & Management, 58(1). DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102430
- Yu, M. C., Wu, Y. C. J., Alhalabi, W., Kao, H. Y., & Wu, W. H. (2016). ResearchGate: An effective altmetric indicator for active researchers?. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1001-1006. DOI: 10.1016/j. chb.2015.11.007
- Zhu, J., Hu, G., & Liu, W. (2019). DOI errors and possible solutions for Web of Science. Scientometrics, 118(2), 709-718. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2980-7