References
- Adams, J. (2013). The fourth age of research. Nature, 497(7451), 557–560.
- Boyack, K. W. (2004). Mapping knowledge domains: Characterizing PNAS. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(suppl_1), 5192–5199. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0307509100.
- Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64, 351–374. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-005-0255-6.
- Clarivate (2023). Web of Science Coverage Details. https://clarivate.libguides.com/librarianresources/coverage (Accessed 5 September 2023)
- Coccia M., Bozeman B. (2016). Allometric models to measure and analyze the evolution of international research collaboration, Scientometrics, 108(3), 1065–1084, DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-2027-x
- Coccia, M. (2018). General properties of the evolution of research fields: a scientometric study of human microbiome, evolutionary robotics and astrobiology, Scientometrics, 117(2), 1265–1283, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2902-8
- Coccia, M. (2020). The evolution of scientific disciplines in applied sciences: dynamics and empirical properties of experimental physics, Scientometrics, 124, 451–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03464-y
- Coccia, M., & Wang, L. (2016). Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(8), 2057–2061. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1510820113.
- Coccia M. (2021). Evolution and structure of research fields driven by crises and environmental threats: the COVID-19 research. Scientometrics, 126(12), 9405–9429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04172-x
- Coccia M., Roshani S., Mosleh M. (2021). Scientific Developments and New Technological Trajectories in Sensor Research. Sensors, 21(23), 7803. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21237803
- Coccia, M., Roshani, S., Mosleh, M. (2022). Evolution of Sensor Research for Clarifying the Dynamics and Properties of Future Directions. Sensors, 22(23), 9419. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239419
- Coccia M., Mosleh M., Roshani S., (2022a). Evolution of quantum computing: Theoretical and innovation management implications for emerging quantum industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, DOI (identifier): 10.1109/TEM.2022.3175633.
- Coccia M. (2022). Probability of discoveries between research fields to explain scientific and technological change. Technology in Society, 68, 101874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101874.
- Coccia M. (2019). Intrinsic and extrinsic incentives to support motivation and performance of public organizations. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 6(1): 20–29, http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jeb.v6i1.1795.
- Coccia, M. 2019b. Comparative Institutional Changes. A. Farazmand (ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1277-1.
- Coccia, M., Roshani, S. (2024). The Relation Between Research Funding and Citations in Papers of Nobel Laureates in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine, 2019-2020. Journal of Data and Information Science, 8(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0025.
- Davidson Frame, J., & Carpenter, M. P. (1979). International research collaboration. Social studies of science, 9(4), 481–497. DOI:10.1177/030631277900900405.
- Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB Journal: Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fi.07-9492LSF.
- Fanelli, D., & Glänzel, W. (2013). Bibliometric evidence for a hierarchy of the sciences. PLoS one, 8(6), e66938. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066938.
- Fortunato, S.,Bergstrom, C. T., Börner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojević, S., … & Barabási, A. L. (2018). Science of science. Science, 359(6379), eaao0185. DOI: 10.1126/science. aao0185.
- Grassano, N., Rotolo, D., Hutton, J., Lang, F., & Hopkins, M. M. (2017). Funding data from publication acknowledgments: Coverage, uses, and limitations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4), 999–1017.
- Hicks, D., & Isett, K. R. (2020). Powerful numbers: Exemplary quantitative studies of science that had policy impact. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3), 969–982. Available at: http://works.bepress.com/diana_hicks/54/
- Katz, J. S., & Ronda-Pupo, G. A. (2019). Cooperation, scale-invariance and complex innovation systems: a generalization. Scientometrics, 121(2), 1045–1065. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03215-8.
- Kitcher, P. (2003). Science, truth, and democracy. Oxford University Press.
- Leguendre, P., & Leguendre, L. (2012). Numerical ecology (3rd ed., Vol. 24). Great Britain: Elsevier B. V
- Li, E. Y., Liao, C. H., & Yen, H. R. (2013). Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective. Research Policy, 42(9), 1515–1530. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.012.
- MacLean, M., Davies, C., Lewison, G., & Anderson, J. (1998). Evaluating the research activity and impact of funding agencies. Research Evaluation, 7(1), 7–16. DOI: 10.1093/rev/7.1.7.
- Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis, 79(4), 606–623. DOI: 10.1086/354848.
- Morillo, F. (2020). Is open access publication useful for all research fields? Presence of funding, collaboration and impact. Scientometrics, 125(1), 689–716. DOI:10.1007/s11192-020-03652-w.
- Mosleh, M., Roshani, S., & Coccia, M. (2022). Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science. Scientometrics, 127(4), 1931–1951. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04300-1.
- Newman, M. E. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 101(suppl_1), 5200–5205. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0307545100.
- OECD 2023. Open science. https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/open-science.htm (accessed 18 October 2023)
- Pagliaro, M., Coccia M. (2021). How self-determination of scholars outclasses shrinking public research lab budgets, supporting scientific production: a case study and R&D management implications. Heliyon, 7(1), e05998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05998
- Pao, M. L. (1991). On the relationship of funding and research publications. Scientometrics, 20(1), 257–281. DOI:10.1007/BF02018158.
- Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12. doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
- Price, D. D. S. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(5), 292–306. DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630270505.
- Price, D. J. (1986). Little science, big science... and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Quinlan, K. M., Kane, M., & Trochim, W. M. (2008). Evaluation of large research initiatives: Outcomes, challenges, and methodological considerations. New directions for evaluation, 118, 61–72. DOI: 10.1002/ev.261
- Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(45), 17268–17272. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0806977105.
- Ronda-Pupo, G. A. (2017). The citation-based impact of complex innovation systems scales with the size of the system. Scientometrics, 112(1), 141–151.
- Ronda-Pupo, G. A. (2021). Cuba—US scientific collaboration: Beyond the embargo. Plos one, 16(7), e0255106.
- Ronda-Pupo, G. A., & Katz, J. S. (2016). The power–law relationship between citation-based performance and collaboration in articles in management journals: A scale-independent approach. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(10), 2565–2572. DOI:10.1002/asi.23575.
- Ronda-Pupo, G. A., & Katz, J. S. (2017a). The scaling relationship between citation-based performance and coauthorship patterns in natural sciences. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(5), 1257–1265. DOI:10.1002/asi.23759.
- Ronda-Pupo, G. A., & Katz, J. S. (2017b). The scaling relationship between degree centrality of countries and their citation-based performance on Management Information Systems. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1285–1299.
- Ronda-Pupo, G. A., & Katz, J. S. (2018). The power law relationship between citation impact and multi-authorship patterns in articles in Information Science & Library Science journals. Scientometrics, 114, 919–932. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2612-7.
- Roshani S., Coccia, M. Mosleh M., (2022). Senor technology for opening new pathways in diagnosis and therapeutics of breast, lung, colorectal and prostate cancer. HighTech and Innovation Journal. J. 3 (3) 356–375, https://doi.org/10.28991/HIJ-2022-03-03-010.
- Roshani, S., Bagherylooieh, M. R., Mosleh, M., & Coccia, M. (2021). What is the relationship between research funding and citation-based performance? A comparative analysis between critical disciplines. Scientometrics, 126(9), 7859–7874. DOI:10.1007/s11192-021-04077-9.
- Simonton, D. K. (2004). Psychology’s status as a scientific discipline: Its empirical placement within an implicit hierarchy of the sciences. Review of General Psychology, 8(1), 59–67. DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.59.
- Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., …, Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126, 5113–5142.
- Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American society for Information Science, 50(9), 799–813. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571
- Smith, L. D., Best, L. A., Stubbs, D. A., Johnston, J., & Archibald, A. B. (2000). Scientific graphs and the hierarchy of the sciences: A Latourian survey of inscription practices. Social studies of science, 30(1), 73–94. DOI: 10.1177/030631200030001003.
- Smith, R. J. (2009). Use and misuse of the reduced major axis for line-fitting. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 140(3), 476–486.
- Stephan, P. E. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic literature, 34(3), 1199–1235.
- Storer, N. W. (1967). The hard sciences and the soft: Some sociological observations. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 55(1), 75.
- Wang J., P. Shapira. (2015). Is There a Relationship between Research Sponsorship and Publication Impact? An Analysis of Funding Acknowledgments in Nanotechnology Papers. PLoS ONE 10, e0117727. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117727.
- Web of Science 2023. Web of Science, Search in: Web of Science Core Collection, http://apps.webofknowledge.com/WOS_GeneralSearch_input.do?product=WOS&SID=E5lSYgaLwJn 6kp2iz2G&search_mode=GeneralSearch (Accessed 10 May 2023)
- Yan, E. J, Wu, C. J., & Song, M. (2018). The funding factor: A cross-disciplinary examination of the association between research funding and citation impact. Scientometrics, 115, 369–384. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2583-8.