The Scientometric Measurement of Interdisciplinarity and Diversity in the Research Portfolios of Chinese Universities
By:
References
- Abramo, G., Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo, & Zhang, L. (2018). A comparison of two approaches for measuring interdisciplinary research output: The disciplinary diversity of authors vs the disciplinary diversity of the reference list. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1182–1193.
- Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to pearson's correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 550–560.
- Brewer, D.J., Gates, S.M., & Goldman, C.A. (2001). In Pursuit of Prestige: Strategy and Competition in U.S. Higher Education. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers, Rutgers University.
- Buchan, I. (2002). Calculating the Gini coefficient of inequality. https://www.nibhi.org.uk/Training/Statistics/Gini%20coefficient.doc.
- Carley, S., Porter, A.L., & Leydesdorff, I.R.L. (2017). Visualization of disciplinary profiles: Enhanced science overlay maps. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(3), 68–111.
- Dixon, P.M., & Weiner, J. (1987). Mitchell-Olds T, Woodley R. Boot-strapping the Gini coefficient of inequality. Ecology, 68, 1548–1551.
- Egghe, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). The Relation between Pearson's correlation coefficient r and Salton's cosine measure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(5), 1027–1036.
- Frenken, K., Oort, F. van, & Verburg, T.N. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697.
- Griliches, Z. (1994). Productivity, R&D and the Data constraint. American Economic Review, 84(1), 1–23.
- Halffman, W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Is inequality among universities increasing? Gini coefficients and the elusive rise of Elite Universities. Minerva, 48(1), 55–72.
- Herfindahl, O.C. (1950). Concentration in the U.S. steel industry. New York: Columbia University.
- Hirschman, A.O. (1945). National power and the structure of foreign trade. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Kessler, M.M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14, 10–25.
- Leinster, T., & Cobbold, C.A. (2012). Measuring diversity: The importance of species similarity. Ecology, 93(3), 477–489.
- Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(5), 601–613.
- Leydesdorff, L. (2015). Can technology life-cycles be indicated by diversity in patent classifications? The crucial role of variety. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1441–1451.
- Leydesdorff, L., & Ivanova, I. (2021). The Measurement of “Interdisciplinarity” and “Synergy” in Scientific and Extra-Scientific Collaborations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(1), 387–402. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24416
- Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2011). Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 87–100.
- Le ydesdorff, L., & Schank, T. (2008). Dynamic animations of journal maps: Indicators of structural changes and interdisciplinary developments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1810–1818.
- Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C.S., & Bornmann, L. (2018). Betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplinarity—A tribute to Eugene Garfield. Scientometrics, 114(2), 567–592.
- Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C.S., & Bornmann, L. (2019). Diversity measurement: Steps towards the measurement of interdisciplinarity? Journal of Informetrics, 13(3), 904–905.
- Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C.S., & Bornmann, L. (2019). Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals: Rao-Stirling Diversity, Relative Variety, and the Gini coefficient. Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 255–264.
- Leydesdorff, L. & Zhou, P. (2007). Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents. Scientometrics, 70(3), 693–713.
- Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C.S., & Zhang, L. (2021). Are University Rankings Statistically Significant? A Comparison among Chinese Universities and with the USA. Journal of Digital and Information Science and Technology JDIST; arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.08591.
- Liu, X. (2018). The ‘double first class’ initiative under top-level design. ECNU review of education. 1(1), 147–152.
- Lorenz, M. (1905). Methods of Measuring the Concentration of Wealth. Publications of the American Statistical Association, 9(70), 209–219.
- Mills, J.A., & Zandvakili, A. (1997). Statistical inference via bootstrapping for measures of inequality. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 12, 133–150.
- Nijssen, D., Rousseau, R., & Hecke, P.V. (1998). The Lorenz curve: A graphical representation of evenness. 13(1), 33–38.
- Pfeffer, J., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2013). txt2pajek: Creating Pajek Files from Text Files. Technical Report, 110, CMU-ISR-13.
- Porter, A.L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719–745.
- Powell, W.W., & DiMaggio, P.J. (Eds.). (2012). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Pratt, A.D. (1977). A measure of class concentration in bibliometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 28(5), 285–292.
- Rafols, I. (2014). Knowledge integration and diffusion: Measures and mapping of diversity and coherence. In Measuring Scholarly Impact (pp. 169–190). Springer, Cham.
- Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2007). How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors. Scientometrics, 70(3), 633–650.
- Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263–287.
- Rafols, I., Porter, A.L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1871–1887.
- Rousseau, R. (1992). Concentration and diversity measures in informetric research. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Antwerp.
- Rousseau, R. (2018). The repeat rate: From Hirschman to Stirling, Scientometrics, 116(1), 645–653.
- Rousseau, R. (2019). On the Leydesdorff-Wagner-Bornmann proposal for diversity measurement. Journal of Informetrics, 13(3), 906–907.
- Salton, G., & McGill, M.J. (1983). Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. Auckland, etc: McGraw-Hill.
- Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423.
- Simpson, E.H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163(4148), 688–688.
- Stirling, A. (1998). On the economics and analysis of diversity. Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), Electronic Working Papers Series, Paper, 28, 1–156.
- Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4(15), 707–719.
- Wagner, C.S., Bornmann, L., Cai, X., & Leydesdorff, L. (in preparation). Isomorphism as an Ordering Dynamic in the Growth of China's Science System.
- Waltman, L., Eck, N.J., & Noyons, E.C.M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635.
- Whitley, R.D. (1984). The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Zhang, L., Rousseau, R., & Glänzel, W. (2016). Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(5), 1257–1265.
- Zhang, L., Sun, B., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Chen, L., & Huang, Y. (2018). Interdisciplinarity and collaboration: On the relationship between disciplinary diversity in departmental affiliations and reference lists. Scientometrics, 117(1), 271–291.
- Zhang, L., Sun, B., Jiang, L., & Huang, Y. (2021). On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and impact: Distinct effects on academic and broader impact, Research Evaluation, rvab007. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvab007
Language: English
Page range: 13 - 35
Submitted on: Jan 17, 2021
Accepted on: Jun 1, 2021
Published on: Jun 24, 2021
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2021 Lin Zhang, Loet Leydesdorff, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.