References
- Agasisti, T. (2011). Performances and spending efficiency in higher education: A European comparison. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 19(2), 199–224.
- Agasisti, T., & Bianco, A.D. (2009). Measuring efficiency of higher education institutions. International Journal of Management & Decision Making, 10(5–6), 443–465(23).
- Agasisti, T., & Johnes, G. (2009). Beyond frontiers: Comparing the efficiency of higher education decision-making units across more than one country. Education Economics, 17(1), 59–79.
- Agasisti, T., & Pohl, C. (2012). Comparing German and Italian public universities: Convergence or divergence in the higher education landscape? Managerial & Decision Economics, 33(2), 71–85.
- Asmild, M., Paradi, J.C., Aggarwall, V., & Schaffnit, C. (2004). Combining DEA window analysis with the Malmquist index approach in a study of the Canadian banking industry. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(1), 67–89.
- Avkiran, N.K. (2001). Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian Universities through data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 35, 57–80.
- Barra, C., Lagravinese, R., & Zotti, R. (2018). Does econometric methodology matter to rank universities? An analysis of Italian higher education system. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 62, 104–120.
- Barra, C., & Zotti, R. (2016). Measuring efficiency in higher education: An empirical study using a bootstrapped data envelopment analysis. International Advances in Economic Research, 22(1), 11–33.
- Barros, C.P., Guironnet, J.P., & Peypoch, N. (2011). Productivity growth and biased technical change in French higher education. Economic Modelling, 28(1–2), 641–646.
- Caves, D.W., Christensen, L.R., & Diewert, W.E. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input output, and productivity. Econometrica, 50, 1393–1414.
- Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver Software (Second Edition). New York: Springer.
- Edvardsen, D.F., Førsund, F.R., & Kittelsen, S.A.C. (2017). Productivity development of norwegian institutions of higher education 2004–2013. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(4), 399–415.
- De França, J.M.F., de Figueiredo, J.N., & dos Santos Lapa, J. (2010). A DEA methodology to evaluate the impact of information asymmetry on the efficiency of not-for-profit organizations with an application to higher education in Brazil. Annals of Operations Research, 173(1), 39–56.
- Development Planning Division (MOE, PRC), China Education Statistical Yearbook, People’s Education Press, Beijing, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014.
- Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., & Roos, P. (1989). Productivity developments in Swedish hospitals: A malmquist output index approach. In: Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology and applications. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin A, Seiford L (eds.) Quorum Books.
- Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C.A.K. (1994). Production frontiers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Margaritis, D. (2006). Productivity growth and convergence in the European Union. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 25(1–2), 111–141.
- Glass, J.C., McCallion, G., McKillop, D.G., Rasaratnama, S., & Stringer, K.S. (2006). Implications of variant efficiency measures for policy evaluations in UK higher education. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 40, 119 -142.
- Johnes, G. (2013). Efficiency in English higher education institutions revisited: a network approach. Economics Bulletin, 33, 2698–2706.
- Liu, X., & Zhi, T. (2012). China is catching up in science and innovation: the experience of the Chinese academy of sciences. Science & Public Policy, 37(5), 331–342.
- Luo, L.P., & Wang, D.H. (2007). A review of the Chinese higher education evaluation center. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 4(7), 92–93.
- Malmquist, S. (1953). Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de Estadistica, 4, 209–242.
- Merton, R.K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: a chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 635–659.
- Merton, R.K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 56–63.
- Odeck, J. (2000). Assessing the relative efficiency and productivity growth of vehicle inspection services: an application of DEA and Malmquist indices. European Journal of Operational Research, 126(3), 501–514.
- OECD (2018), Gross domestic spending on R&D (indicator). DOI: 10.1787/d8b068b4-en
- Pastor, J.T., & Lovell, C. A.K. (2005). A global Malmquist productivity index. Economic Letter, 88, 266–271.
- Quan, W., Chen, B., & Shu, F. (2017). Publish or impoverish: An investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999–2016). Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(5), 486–502.
- Research group of competitiveness analysis of Chinese basic research of National Science Library. (2015). Blue Book of Basic Research Competitiveness for China in 2015. Beijing. (in Chinese). Retrieved from https://wenku.baidu.com/view/47b52fbf6bd97f192379e964.html
- Rousseau, S., & Rousseau, R. (1997). Data envelopment analysis as a tool for constructing scientometric indicators. Scientometrics, 40(1), 45–56.
- Schmoch, U., & Schubert, T. (2009). Sustainability of incentives for excellent research – The German case. Scientometrics, 81, 195–218.
- Schmoch, U., Schubert, T., Jansen, D., Heidler, R., & Görtz, R.V. (2010). How to use indicators to measure scientific performance: A balanced approach. Research Evaluation, 19(1), 2–18.
- Schubert, T. (2009). Empirical observations on new public management to increase efficiency in public research - Boon or bane? Research Policy, 38, 1225–1234.
- Schubert, T. (2014). Are there scale economies in scientific production? On the topic of locally increasing returns to scale. Scientometrics, 99, 393–408.
- Shephard, R.W. (1970). Theory of costs and production functions. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
- Singh, S., & Ranjan, P. (2017). Efficiency analysis of non-homogeneous parallel sub-unit systems for the performance measurement of higher education. Annals of Operations Research, (1), 1–26. doi: 10.1007/s10479-017-2586-0
- Thanassoulis, E., Kortelainen, M., Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (2011). Costs and efficiency of higher education institutions in England: A DEA analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(7), 1282–1297.
- Tone, K. (2004). Malmquist productivity index: Efficiency change over time. In: Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Zhu, J., Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis, Norwell Mass., Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Wolszczak-Derlacz, J. (2017). An evaluation and explanation of (in)efficiency in higher education institutions in Europe and the US with the application of two-stage semi-parametric DEA. Research Policy, 46(9), 1595–1605.
- Worthington, A.C., & Lee, B.L. (2008). Efficiency, technology and productivity in Australian universities, 1998–2003. Economics of Education Review, 27, 285–298.
- Yang, G.L., Rousseau, R., Yang, L.Y., & Liu, W.B. (2014). A study on directional returns to scale. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 628–641.
- Yong, S.L. (1996). ‘Technology transfer’ and the research university: A search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research Policy, 25(6), 843–863.
- Zhang, D.Q., Banker, R.D., Li, X.X., & Liu, W.B. (2011). Performance impact of research policy at the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Research Policy, 40, 875–885.