Measuring Scientific Productivity in China Using Malmquist Productivity Index

Song, Yaoyao; Schubert, Torben; Liu, Huihui; Yang, Guoliang

doi:10.2478/jdis-2019-0003

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to investigate the scientific productivity of China’s science system.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper employs the Malmquist productivity index (MPI) based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA).

Findings

The results reveal that the overall efficiency of Chinese universities increased significantly from 2009 to 2016, which is mainly driven by technological progress. From the perspective of the functions of higher education, research and transfer activities perform better than the teaching activities.

Research limitations

As an implication, the indicator selection mechanism, investigation period and the MPI model can be further extended in the future research.

Practical implications

The results indicate that Chinese education administrative departments should take actions to guide and promote the teaching activities and formulate reasonable resource allocation regulations to reach the balanced development in Chinese universities.

Originality/value

This paper selects 58 Chinese universities and conducts a quantified measurement during the period 2009–2016. Three main functional activities of universities (i.e. teaching, researching, and application) are innovatively categorized into different schemes, and we calculate their performance, respectively.

References

Agasisti, T. (2011). Performances and spending efficiency in higher education: A European comparison. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 19(2), 199–224.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Agasisti, T., & Bianco, A.D. (2009). Measuring efficiency of higher education institutions. International Journal of Management & Decision Making, 10(5–6), 443–465(23).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Agasisti, T., & Johnes, G. (2009). Beyond frontiers: Comparing the efficiency of higher education decision-making units across more than one country. Education Economics, 17(1), 59–79.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Agasisti, T., & Pohl, C. (2012). Comparing German and Italian public universities: Convergence or divergence in the higher education landscape? Managerial & Decision Economics, 33(2), 71–85.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Asmild, M., Paradi, J.C., Aggarwall, V., & Schaffnit, C. (2004). Combining DEA window analysis with the Malmquist index approach in a study of the Canadian banking industry. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(1), 67–89.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Avkiran, N.K. (2001). Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian Universities through data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 35, 57–80.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barra, C., Lagravinese, R., & Zotti, R. (2018). Does econometric methodology matter to rank universities? An analysis of Italian higher education system. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 62, 104–120.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barra, C., & Zotti, R. (2016). Measuring efficiency in higher education: An empirical study using a bootstrapped data envelopment analysis. International Advances in Economic Research, 22(1), 11–33.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barros, C.P., Guironnet, J.P., & Peypoch, N. (2011). Productivity growth and biased technical change in French higher education. Economic Modelling, 28(1–2), 641–646.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Caves, D.W., Christensen, L.R., & Diewert, W.E. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input output, and productivity. Econometrica, 50, 1393–1414.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver Software (Second Edition). New York: Springer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Edvardsen, D.F., Førsund, F.R., & Kittelsen, S.A.C. (2017). Productivity development of norwegian institutions of higher education 2004–2013. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(4), 399–415.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
De França, J.M.F., de Figueiredo, J.N., & dos Santos Lapa, J. (2010). A DEA methodology to evaluate the impact of information asymmetry on the efficiency of not-for-profit organizations with an application to higher education in Brazil. Annals of Operations Research, 173(1), 39–56.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Development Planning Division (MOE, PRC), China Education Statistical Yearbook, People’s Education Press, Beijing, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., & Roos, P. (1989). Productivity developments in Swedish hospitals: A malmquist output index approach. In: Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology and applications. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin A, Seiford L (eds.) Quorum Books.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C.A.K. (1994). Production frontiers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Margaritis, D. (2006). Productivity growth and convergence in the European Union. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 25(1–2), 111–141.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Glass, J.C., McCallion, G., McKillop, D.G., Rasaratnama, S., & Stringer, K.S. (2006). Implications of variant efficiency measures for policy evaluations in UK higher education. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 40, 119 -142.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Johnes, G. (2013). Efficiency in English higher education institutions revisited: a network approach. Economics Bulletin, 33, 2698–2706.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liu, X., & Zhi, T. (2012). China is catching up in science and innovation: the experience of the Chinese academy of sciences. Science & Public Policy, 37(5), 331–342.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Luo, L.P., & Wang, D.H. (2007). A review of the Chinese higher education evaluation center. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 4(7), 92–93.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Malmquist, S. (1953). Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de Estadistica, 4, 209–242.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Merton, R.K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: a chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 635–659.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Merton, R.K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 56–63.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Odeck, J. (2000). Assessing the relative efficiency and productivity growth of vehicle inspection services: an application of DEA and Malmquist indices. European Journal of Operational Research, 126(3), 501–514.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
OECD (2018), Gross domestic spending on R&D (indicator). DOI: 10.1787/d8b068b4-en
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pastor, J.T., & Lovell, C. A.K. (2005). A global Malmquist productivity index. Economic Letter, 88, 266–271.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Quan, W., Chen, B., & Shu, F. (2017). Publish or impoverish: An investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999–2016). Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(5), 486–502.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Research group of competitiveness analysis of Chinese basic research of National Science Library. (2015). Blue Book of Basic Research Competitiveness for China in 2015. Beijing. (in Chinese). Retrieved from https://wenku.baidu.com/view/47b52fbf6bd97f192379e964.html
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rousseau, S., & Rousseau, R. (1997). Data envelopment analysis as a tool for constructing scientometric indicators. Scientometrics, 40(1), 45–56.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schmoch, U., & Schubert, T. (2009). Sustainability of incentives for excellent research – The German case. Scientometrics, 81, 195–218.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schmoch, U., Schubert, T., Jansen, D., Heidler, R., & Görtz, R.V. (2010). How to use indicators to measure scientific performance: A balanced approach. Research Evaluation, 19(1), 2–18.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schubert, T. (2009). Empirical observations on new public management to increase efficiency in public research - Boon or bane? Research Policy, 38, 1225–1234.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schubert, T. (2014). Are there scale economies in scientific production? On the topic of locally increasing returns to scale. Scientometrics, 99, 393–408.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shephard, R.W. (1970). Theory of costs and production functions. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Singh, S., & Ranjan, P. (2017). Efficiency analysis of non-homogeneous parallel sub-unit systems for the performance measurement of higher education. Annals of Operations Research, (1), 1–26. doi: 10.1007/s10479-017-2586-0
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thanassoulis, E., Kortelainen, M., Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (2011). Costs and efficiency of higher education institutions in England: A DEA analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(7), 1282–1297.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tone, K. (2004). Malmquist productivity index: Efficiency change over time. In: Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Zhu, J., Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis, Norwell Mass., Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wolszczak-Derlacz, J. (2017). An evaluation and explanation of (in)efficiency in higher education institutions in Europe and the US with the application of two-stage semi-parametric DEA. Research Policy, 46(9), 1595–1605.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Worthington, A.C., & Lee, B.L. (2008). Efficiency, technology and productivity in Australian universities, 1998–2003. Economics of Education Review, 27, 285–298.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yang, G.L., Rousseau, R., Yang, L.Y., & Liu, W.B. (2014). A study on directional returns to scale. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 628–641.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yong, S.L. (1996). ‘Technology transfer’ and the research university: A search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research Policy, 25(6), 843–863.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang, D.Q., Banker, R.D., Li, X.X., & Liu, W.B. (2011). Performance impact of research policy at the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Research Policy, 40, 875–885.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article