References
- Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2015). Evaluating university research: Same performance indicator, different rankings. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 514−525.
- Abramo, G., D’Angelo, A. C., & Murgia, G. (2017). The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 1016−1030.
- Adams, J. (2013). Collaborations: The fourth age of research. Nature, 497(7451), 557−560.
- Andersson, D. E., Gunessee, S., Matthiessen, C. W., & Find, S. (2014). The geography of Chinese science. Environment and Planning A, 46(12), 2950−2971.
- Archambault, É., & Larivière, V. (2011). Scientific publications and patenting by companies: A study of the whole population of Canadian firms over 25 years. Science and Public Policy, 38(4), 269–278.
- Bennett, J. C. (2007). The Anglosphere Challenge: Why the English-Speaking Nations Will Lead the Way in the Twenty-First Century. Lanham, Maryland, USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
- Björkman, B. (2011). Pragmatic strategies in English as an academic lingua franca: Ways of achieving communicative effectiveness? Journal of Pragmatics, 43(4), 950−964.
- Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1954−1962.
- Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Which are the best performing regions in information science in terms of highly cited papers? Some improvements of our previous mapping approaches. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2), 336−345.
- Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., Walch-Solimena, C., & Ettl, C. (2011). Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 537−546.
- Bornmann, L., & Waltman, L. (2011). The detection of “hot regions” in the geography of science-A visualization approach by using density maps. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 547−553.
- Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1989). Some data on the distribution of journal publication types in the science citation index database. Scientometrics, 15(5–6), 325−330.
- Braun, T., & Dióspatonyi, I. (2005). World flash on basic research: The counting of core journal gatekeepers as science indicators really counts. The scientific scope of action and strength of nations. Scientometrics, 62(3), 297−319.
- Braun, T., Zsindely, S., Dióspatonyi, I., & Zádor, E. (2007). Gatekeeping patterns in nano-titled journals. Scientometrics, 70(3), 651−667.
- Butler, Y.G., & Iino, M. (2005). Current Japanese reforms in English language education: The 2003 “action plan”. Language Policy, 4(1), 25−45.
- Campbell, L. (2010). Language Isolates and Their History, or, What’s Weird, Anyway? In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 16−31). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
- Castelvecchi, D. (2015). Physics paper sets record with more than 5,000 authors. Nature News, 15/05/2015. 10.1038/nature.2015.17567
- Csomós, G., & Tóth, G. (2016). Exploring the position of cities in global corporate research and development: A bibliometric analysis by two different geographical approaches. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 516−532.
- Csomós, G. (2018). A spatial scientometric analysis of the publication output of cities worldwide. Journal of Informetrics, 12(2), 547−566.
- de Almeida, E. C. E., & Guimarães, J. A. (2013). Brazil’s growing production of scientific articles-how are we doing with review articles and other qualitative indicators? Scientometrics, 97(2), 287−315.
- de Solla Price, D. (1978). Toward a model for science indicators. In Y. Elkana, J. Lederberg, R. K. Merton, A. Thackray, H. Zuckerman (Eds.), Toward a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators (pp. 69–95). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Docampo, D., & Cram, L. (2014). On the internal dynamics of the Shanghai ranking. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1347−1366.
- Docampo, D., Egret, D., & Cram, L. (2015). The effect of university mergers on the Shanghai ranking. Scientometrics, 104(1), 175−191.
- Frenken, K., Heimeriks, G. J., & Hoekman, J. (2017). What drives university research performance? An analysis using the CWTS Leiden Ranking data. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 859−872.
- Grossetti, M., Eckert, D., Gingras, Y., Jégou, L., Larivière, V., & Milard, B. (2014). Cities and the geographical deconcentration of scientific activity: A multilevel analysis of publications (1987–2007). Urban Studies, 51(10), 2219−2234.
- Gupta, B. M., Kshitij, A., & Verma, C. (2011). Mapping of Indian computer science research output, 1999-2008. Scientometrics, 86(2), 261-283.
- He, T. (2009). International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries. Scientometrics, 80(3), 571−582.
- Hicks, D. (1995). Published papers, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change, 4(2), 401–424.
- Iwai, Y. (2008). The perceptions of Japanese students toward academic English reading: Implications for effective ESL reading strategies. Multicultural Education, 15(4), 45–50.
- Kato, M., & Ando, A. (2017). National ties of international scientific collaboration and researcher mobility found in Nature and Science. Scientometrics, 110(2), 673−694.
- Kealey, T. (1996). The Economic Laws of Scientific Research. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
- Kim, H., Yoon, J. W., & Crowcroft, J. (2012). Network analysis of temporal trends in scholarly research productivity. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 97−110.
- King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. What different countries get for their research spending. Nature, 430, 311–316.
- Kumar, S., & Garg, K. C. (2005). Scientometrics of computer science research in India and China. Scientometrics, 64(2), 121-132.
- Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, É. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68(3), 519−533.
- Lee, L. C., Lin, P. H., Chuang, Y. W., & Lee, Y. Y. (2011). Research output and economic productivity: A Granger causality test. Scientometrics, 89(2), 465−478.
- Leta, J., Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2006). Science in Brazil. Part 2: Sectoral and institutional research profiles. Scientometrics, 67(1), 87-105.
- Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. (2009). Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system. Scientometrics, 78(1), 23-36.
- Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C. S., & Bornmann, L. (2014). The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 606−617.
- Li, J., Qiao, L., Li, W., & Jin, Y. (2014). Chinese-language articles are not biased in citations: Evidences from Chinese-English bilingual journals in Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 912–916.
- Liefner, I., Hennemann, S., & Lu, X. (2006). Cooperation in the innovation process in developing countries: Empirical evidence from Zhongguancun, Beijing. Environment and Planning A, 38(1), 111–130.
- Lin, C. S., Huang, M. H., & Chen, D. Z. (2013). The influences of counting methods on university rankings based on paper count and citation count. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 611−621.
- López-navarro, I., Moreno, A. I., Quintanilla, M. Á., & Rey-Rocha, J. (2015). Why do I publish research articles in English instead of my own language? Differences in Spanish researchers’ motivations across scientific domains. Scientometrics, 103(3), 939-976.
- Lu, K., & Wolfram, D. (2010). Geographic characteristics of the growth of informetrics literature 1987-2008. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 591−601.
- Maisonobe, M., Eckert, D., Grossetti, M., Jégou, L., & Milard, B. (2016). The world network of scientific collaborations between cities: domestic or international dynamics? Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1025−1036.
- Maisonobe, M., Grossetti, M., Milard, B., Jégou, L., & Eckert, D. (2017). The global geography of scientific visibility: a deconcentration process (1999–2011). Scientometrics, 113(1), 479−493.
- Matthiessen, C.W., & Schwarz, A.W. (1999). Scientific centres in Europe: An analysis of research strength and patterns of specialisation based on bibliometric indicators. Urban Studies, 36(3), 453−477.
- Meo, S. A., Al Masri, A. A., Usmani, A. M., Memon, A. N., & Zaidi, S. Z. (2013). Impact of GDP, Spending on R&D, Number of Universities and Scientific Journals on Research Publications among Asian Countries. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e66449
- Miyairi, N., & Chang, H. W. (2012). Bibliometric characteristics of highly cited papers from Taiwan, 2000-2009. Scientometrics, 92(1), 197−205.
- Moin, M., Mahmoudi, M., & Rezaei, N. (2005). Scientific output of Iran at the threshold of the 21st century. Scientometrics, 62(2), 239−248.
- Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213−228.
- Morrison, J. (2014). China becomes world’s third-largest producer of research articles. Nature News, 06/02/2014. 10.1038/nature.2014.14684
- Nature Index (2016). US tops global research performance. Nature Index, 20/04/2016.
https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/us-tops-global-research-performance - Paasi, A. (2005). Globalisation, academic capitalism, and the uneven geographies of international journal publishing spaces. Environment and Planning A, 37(5), 769–789.
- Pan, K. R., Kaski, K., & Fortunato, S. (2012). World citation and collaboration networks: uncovering the role of geography in science. Scientific Reports, 2, 902
- Paul-Hus, A., Mongeon, P., Sainte-marie, M., & Larivière, V. (2017). The sum of it all: Revealing collaboration patterns by combining authorship and acknowledgements. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 80−87.
- Piro, F. N., & Sivertsen, G. (2016). How can differences in international university rankings be explained? Scientometrics, 109(3), 2263−2278.
- Shehatta, I., & Mahmood, K. (2016). Correlation among top 100 universities in the major six global rankings: policy implications. Scientometrics, 109(2), 1231−1254.
- Sud, P., & Thelwall, M. (2016). Not all international collaboration is beneficial: The Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(8), 1849−1857.
- Tardy, C. (2004). The role of English in scientific communication: Lingua franca or Tyrannosaurus rex? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(3), 247−269.
- Tian, P. (2016). China’s diaspora key to science collaborations. Nature Index, 23/06/2016.
https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/chinas-diaspora-key-to-science-collaborations - Uddin, S., Hossain, L., Abbasi, A., & Rasmussen, K. (2012). Trend and efficiency analysis of co-authorship network. Scientometrics, 90(2), 687–699.
- Van Noorden, R. (2010). Cities: Building the best cities for science. Nature, 467(7318), 906−908.
- Van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results: Some simple mathematical considerations concerning the role of self-citations. Scientometrics, 42(3), 423-428.
- Van Weijen, D. (2012). The Language of (Future) Scientific Communication. Research Trends, 31, 11/2012.
https://www.researchtrends.com/issue-31-november-2012/the-language-of-future-scientific-communication/ - Vinkler, P. (2008). Correlation between the structure of scientific research, scientometric indicators and GDP in EU and non-EU countries. Scientometrics, 74(2), 237−254.
- Vinkler, P. (2010). The Evaluation of Research by Scientometric Indicators. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
- Wang, X., Xu, S., Wang, Z., Peng, L., & Wang, C. (2013). International scientific collaboration of China: Collaborating countries, institutions and individuals. Scientometrics, 95(3), 885−894.
- Xie, Y., Zhang, C., & Lai, Q. (2014). China’s rise as a major contributor to science and technology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(26), 9437−9442.
- Zhang, H., & Guo, H. (1997). Scientific research collaboration in China. Scientometrics, 38(2), 309−319.
- Zhou, P., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2009a). Regional analysis on Chinese scientific output. Scientometrics, 81(3), 839−857.
- Zhou, P., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2009b). Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences? Scientometrics, 79(3), 593−621.
- Zhou, Y. (2005). The making of an innovative region from a centrally planned economy: Institutional evolution in Zhongguancun Science Park in Beijing. Environment and Planning A, 37(6), 1113−1134.
- Zou, Y., & Laubichler, M.D. (2017). Measuring the contributions of Chinese scholars to the research field of systems biology from 2005 to 2013. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1615−1631.