Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Value of Optical Coherence Tomography Parameters in Estimating Non-Critical Lesions in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Cover

The Value of Optical Coherence Tomography Parameters in Estimating Non-Critical Lesions in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

Open Access
|Mar 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

OCT with 3D reconstruction. Severe malposition of the stent requiring 1:1 noncompliant balloon post dilatation.

Figure 2.

ROC curve for OCT-derived MLA to predict FFR < 0.8. Sensibility 83.1%, specificity 68.6%, accuracy 74.8%.

Figure 3.

ROC curve for PAS to predict FFR < 0.8. Sensibility 60.0%, specificity 80.2%, accuracy 71.5%.

Figure 4.

Comparative analysis of RMA and LMA.

Figure 5.

ROC curve for MLA in the LAD. Sensibility 78.3%, specificity 75.8%, accuracy 77.2%.

Figure 6.

ROC curve for PAS in the LAD. Sensibility 91.3%, specificity 51.5%, accuracy 74.7%.

Figure 7.

ROC curve for MLA in the RCA. Sensibility 90.1%, specificity 77.8%, accuracy 81.6%.

Figure 8.

ROC curve for PAS in the RCA. Sensibility 100.0%, specificity 33.3%, accuracy 52.6%.

Figure 9.

ROC curve for MLA in the CX. Sensibility 100.0%, specificity 48.0%, accuracy 59.4%.

Figure 10.

ROC curve for PAS in the CX. Sensibility 85.7%, specificity 76.0%, accuracy 78.1%.

j_jce-2026-0003_utab_010

AUCTest result variable(s): %AS average reference
AreaStd. ErroraAsymptotic Sig.bAsymptotic 95% CI
0.8230.0940.0100.638–1.000

j_jce-2026-0003_utab_005

Paired-sample area difference under the ROC curves
Test result pair(s)AsymptoticAUC differenceStd. error differenceAsymptotic 95% CI
RMA-1.5720.116-0.0490.269-0.111–0.012
MLA x

j_jce-2026-0003_utab_004

Area under the ROC curve
Test result variable(s)AreaStd. ErroraAsymptotic Sig.bAsymptotic 95% CI
%RMA0.7610.0390.0000.685–0.837
MLA x0.8100.0350.0000.741–0.879

j_jce-2026-0003_utab_007

AUCTest result variable(s): %AS average reference
AreaStd. ErroraAsymptotic Sig.bAsymptotic 95% CI
0.9260.0520.0000.823–1.000

j_jce-2026-0003_utab_006

AUCTest result variable(s): %PAS
AreaStd. ErroraAsymptotic Sig.bAsymptotic 95% CI
0.7520.0550.0000.644–0.861

j_jce-2026-0003_utab_001

AUC,Test result variable(s): MLA
AreaStd. ErroraAsymptotic Sig.bAsymptotic 95% CI
0.8100.0350.0000.741–0.879

Demographics, FFR, OCT and angiographic findings

nMinMaxMeans.d.FFR ≤ 0.8s.d.FFR > 0.8s.d.p value
FFR1510.410.980.810.100.720.070.880.04<0.001
Age15136.0081.0060.4110.4261.0010.1959.9710.630.55
OCT proximal area1512.8320.568.843.048.452.959.133.090.17
OCT distal area1511.7918.386.792.776.232.667.222.800.03
Average area1512.6819.477.822.557.342.378.172.640.04
Lesion length1516.2065.6031.3313.2035.5514.5228.1411.180.001
MLA1510.755.512.211.061.610.622.671.09<0.001
%AS average reference 21.5192.0070.9711.8076.978.0466.4412.19<0.001
Proximal reference diameter 1.905.113.270.571.250.281.590.36<0.001
Distal reference diameter 1.514.842.860.582.760.562.980.580.02
Average reference diameter 1.844.973.080.503.000.483.170.510.03
Minimum diameter1510.842.531.440.371.250.281.590.36<0.001
%Diameter stenosis (vs. average reference diameter) 26.1883.6946.7810.1950.3510.1742.058.15<0.001
FFR ≤ 0.8 6543% 65 86
VesselLAD8053.30% 47 (72.3%) 33 (38.4%) <0.001
RCA3825.30%
LCX3321.85%
Male 12784.10% 56 (86.2%) 71 (82.6%) 0.55
Smoker 4630.50% 23 (35.4%) 23 (26.7%) 0.253
Hypertension 11676.80% 45 (69.2%) 71 (82.6%) 0.055
Dyslipidemia 12180310% 50 (76.9%) 71 (82.6%) 0.341
Diabetes mellitus 4731.10% 20 (30.8%) 27 (31.4%) 0.93

j_jce-2026-0003_utab_003

AUCTest result variable(s): MLA x
AreaStd. ErroraPAsymptotic 95% CI
0.8350.0450.0000.747–0.922

j_jce-2026-0003_utab_002

AUCTest result variable(s): PAS
AreaStd. ErroraAsymptotic Sig.bAsymptotic 95% CI
0.7610.0390.0000.685–0.836

j_jce-2026-0003_utab_009

AUCTest result variable(s): MLA x
AreaStd. ErroraAsymptotic Sig.bAsymptotic 95% CI
0.8660.0690.0040.731–1.000

j_jce-2026-0003_utab_008

AUCTest result variable(s): MLA x
AreaStd. ErroraAsymptotic Sig.bAsymptotic 95% CI
0.9160.0460.0000.826–1.000

Univariate predictors for FFR ≤ 0_8

Bp valueExp(B) (95% CI)
LAD location1.4340.0004.19 (2.09-8.41)
OCT proximal reference area0.0770.1730.93 (0.83-1.03
OCT distal reference area0.1400.0340.87 (0.76-0.99)
Average reference area0.1380.0500.87 (0.76-1)
Lesion length0.0450.0011.05 (1.02-1.07
MLA1.5380.0000.21 (0.12-0.38)
PAS vs. RA0.1100.0001.12 (1.07-1.17)
PAS vs. proximal reference0.1030.0001.11 (1.06-1.16)
PAS vs. distal reference0.0710.0001.07 (1.04-1.11)

Multivariate predictors for FFR ≤ 0_8

BWaldp valueExp(B) (95% CI)
MLA-2.31727.3690.0000.099 (0.041 - 0.235)
LAD location2.34520.1610.00010.434 (3.749 – 29.04)
Lesion length0.0456.3610.0121.046 (1.01 – 1.084)
OCT distal reference area0.2415.2150.0221.273 (1.035 – 1.566)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jce-2026-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2457-5518 | Journal ISSN: 2457-550X
Language: English
Page range: 29 - 37
Submitted on: Jan 26, 2025
|
Accepted on: Mar 2, 2026
|
Published on: Mar 27, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Bogdan Dragoescu, Liviu Stan, Vlad Ploscaru, Lucian Calmac, Cosmin Mihai, Mugur Marinescu, Nicoleta Popa Fotea, Daniel Tonu, Alexandra Dumitru, Diana Stanciulescu, Alexandru Scafa-Udriste, published by Asociatia Transilvana de Terapie Transvasculara si Transplant KARDIOMED
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.