Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Coronary Angioplasty and Stenting in Acute Coronary Syndromes Using Very Low Contrast Volume and Radiation Dosage Improves Renal and Cardiovascular Outcomes Cover

Coronary Angioplasty and Stenting in Acute Coronary Syndromes Using Very Low Contrast Volume and Radiation Dosage Improves Renal and Cardiovascular Outcomes

Open Access
|Jun 2022

References

  1. 1. Schoos MM, Sejersten M, Baber U, et al. Outcomes of patients calling emergency medical services for suspected acute cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115:13-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.09.042.10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.09.042
  2. 2. Chris P Gale. Acute coronary syndrome in adults: scope of the problem in the UK. British Journal of Cardiology. 2017;24:S3-S9. DOI: 10.5837/bjc.2017.s01.10.5837/bjc.2017.s01
  3. 3. Komiyama K, Nakamura M, Tanabe K, et al. In-hospital mortality analysis of Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome using the Tokyo CCU Network database: Applicability of the GRACE risk score. J Cardiol. 2018;71:251-258. DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.09.006.10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.09.006
  4. 4. Martinez-Sanchez C, Borrayo G, Carrillo J, Juarez U, Quintanilla J, Jerjes-Sanchez C; RENASICA III Investigators. Clinical management and hospital outcomes of acute coronary syndrome patients in Mexico: The Third National Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (RENASICA III). Arch Cardiol Mex. 2016;86:221-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.acmx.2016.04.007.10.1016/j.acmx.2016.04.007
  5. 5. Kodaira M, Sawano M, Kuno T, et al. Outcomes of acute coronary syndrome patients with concurrent extra-cardiac vascular disease in the era of transradial coronary intervention: A retrospective multicenter cohort study. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0223215. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223215.10.1371/journal.pone.0223215
  6. 6. Nikolsky E, Pucelikova T, Mehran R, et al. An evaluation of fluoroscopy time and correlation with outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. 2007;19:208-213.
  7. 7. Genereux P, Stone G, Deliargyris E, et al. Duration of PCI procedure and risk of thrombotic and bleeding complications: insights from the CHAMPION PHOENIX trial [abstract]. In: EuroPCR 2016, Book of Abstracts; 2016 May 17-20; Paris, France: Europa Organisation; 2016. Euro16A-OP0756.
  8. 8. Asada S, Sakakura K, Taniguchi Y, et al. Association of the long fluoroscopy time with factors in contemporary primary percutaneous coronary interventions. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0237362. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237362.10.1371/journal.pone.0237362
  9. 9. Ramsdale DR, Aziz S, Newall N, Palmer N, Jackson M. Bacteremia following complex percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. 2004;16:632-634.
  10. 10. Samore MH, Wessolossky MA, Lewis SM, Shubrooks SJ Jr, Karchmer AW. Frequency, risk factors, and outcome for bacteremia after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:873-877. DOI: 10.1016/ s0002-9149(97)00006-4.10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00006-4
  11. 11. Gori T, Münzel T. Biological effects of low-dose radiation: of harm and hormesis. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:292-295. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr288.10.1093/eurheartj/ehr28821862465
  12. 12. Wei KC, Lin HY, Hung SK, et al. Leukemia Risk After Cardiac Fluoroscopic Interventions Stratified by Procedure Number, Exposure Latent Time, and Sex: A Nationwide Population-Based Case-Control Study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e2953. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002953.10.1097/MD.0000000000002953499887626962795
  13. 13. Sacha J, Gierlotka M, Feusette P, Dudek D. Ultra-low contrast coronary angiography and zero-contrast percutaneous coronary intervention for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: step-by-step approach and review. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2019;15:127-136. DOI: 10.5114/ aic.2019.86007.10.5114/aic.2019.86007672723031497044
  14. 14. Azzalini L, Laricchia A, Regazzoli D, et al. Ultra-Low Contrast Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Minimize the Risk for Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Severe Chronic Kidney Disease. J Invasive Cardiol. 2019;31:176-182.
  15. 15. Rozenbaum Z, Benchetrit S, Rozenbaum E, Neumark E, Mosseri M, Pereg D. Ultra-Low Contrast Volume for Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Coronary Procedures. Nephron. 2018;138:296-302. DOI: 10.1159/000485648.10.1159/00048564829393219
  16. 16. Harding SA, Mowjood T, Fairley S. Ultra-Low Contrast Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Complicated by Coronary Perforation. JACC Case Rep. 2020;2:2429-2431. DOI: 10.1016/j. jaccas.2020.09.029.10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.09.029
  17. 17. Arokiaraj MC. Emergency coronary angioplasty with stenting using Cordis® diagnostic coronary catheters when there is difficulty in engaging guide catheters and bench evaluation of diagnostic and guide catheters. Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018;37:117-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.repc.2017.04.007.10.1016/j.repc.2017.04.00729426798
  18. 18. Kobayashi T, Hirshfeld JW Jr. Radiation Exposure in Cardiac Catheterization: Operator Behavior Matters. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:e005689. DOI: 10.1161/ CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005689.10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.00568928801543
  19. 19. Kaul P, Medvedev S, Hohmann SF, Douglas PS, Peterson ED, Patel MR. Ionizing radiation exposure to patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction in the United States. Circulation. 2010;122:2160-2169. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.973339.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.97333921060076
  20. 20. Kuon E. Radiation exposure in invasive cardiology. Heart. 2008;94:667-674. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2007.125021.10.1136/hrt.2007.12502118411362
  21. 21. Picano E, Vano E. The Radiation Issue in Cardiology: the time for action is now. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2011;9:35. DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-9-35.10.1186/1476-7120-9-35325610122104562
  22. 22. Hong CS, Chen ZC, Tang KT, Chang WT. The Effectiveness and Safety between Monoplane and Biplane Imaging During Coronary Angiographies. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2020;36:105-110. DOI: 10.6515/ACS.202003_36(2).20190820A.
  23. 23. Leistner DM, Schlender LS, Steiner J, et al. A randomised comparison of monoplane versus biplane fluoroscopy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the RAMBO trial. EuroIntervention. 2020;16:672-679. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00217.10.4244/EIJ-D-20-0021732392169
  24. 24. Williams MC, Stewart C, Weir NW, Newby DE. Using radiation safely in cardiology: what imagers need to know. Heart. 2019;105:798-806. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312493.10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312493658073230777934
  25. 25. Farman MT, Khan NU, Sial JA, Saghir T, Rizvi SN, Zaman KS. Comparison of fluoroscopy time during coronary angiography and interventions by radial and femoral routes – can we decrease the fluoroscopy time with increased experience? An observational study. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2011;11:607-612. DOI: 10.5152/akd.2011.163.10.5152/akd.2011.16321959874
  26. 26. Barbosa RR, Bortot CF, Serpa RG, et al. Comparison of Fluoroscopy Time During Coronary Angiography by Radial and Femoral Routes. Rev Bras Cardiol Invasiva. 2014;22:343-348. DOI: 10.1590/0104-1843000000057.10.1590/0104-1843000000057
  27. 27. Puymirat E, Cayla G, Simon T, et al. Multivessel PCI Guided by FFR or Angiography for Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:297-308. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104650.10.1056/NEJMoa210465033999545
  28. 28. Megaly M, Pershad A, Glogoza M, et al. Use of Intravascular Imaging in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 202;30:59-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.09.032.10.1016/j.carrev.2020.09.03233032963
  29. 29. Crowhurst JA, Whitby M, Savage M, et al. Factors contributing to radiation dose for patients and operators during diagnostic cardiac angiography. J Med Radiat Sci. 2019;66:20-29. DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.315.10.1002/jmrs.315639918930488575
  30. 30. Mann H, Ward JH, Samlowski WE. Vascular leak syndrome associated with interleukin-2: chest radiographic manifestations. Radiology. 1990;176:191-194. DOI: 10.1148/ radiology.176.1.2353090.10.1148/radiology.176.1.23530902353090
  31. 31. Gaynor ER, Vitek L, Sticklin L, et al. The hemodynamic effects of treatment with interleukin-2 and lymphokine-activated killer cells. Ann Intern Med. 1988;109:953-958. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-109-12-953.10.7326/0003-4819-109-12-9533264128
  32. 32. Ndrepepa G, Kastrati A. Activated clotting time during percutaneous coronary intervention: a test for all seasons or a mind tranquilizer? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:e002576. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002576.10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.00257625873733
  33. 33. Le May M, Wells G, So D, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Femoral Access vs Radial Access in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The SAFARI-STEMI Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:126-134. DOI: 10.1001/ jamacardio.2019.4852.10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4852699093131895439
  34. 34. Vranckx P, Frigoli E, Rothenbühler M, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:1069-1080. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx048.10.1093/eurheartj/ehx04828329389
  35. 35. Sandoval Y, Bell M, Gulati R. Transradial Artery Access Complications. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:e007386. DOI:10.1161/Circinterventions.119.007386.10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.00738631672030
  36. 36. Arokiaraj MC. Angioplasty with Stenting in Acute Coronary Syndromes with Very Low Contrast Volume Using 6F Diagnostic Catheters and Bench Testing of Catheters. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7:1004-1012. DOI: 10.3889/ oamjms.2019.238.10.3889/oamjms.2019.238645417030976350
  37. 37. Konttila K, Koivula K, Eskola M, et al. Poor long-term outcome in acute coronary syndrome in a real-life setting: Ten-year outcome of the TACOS study. Cardiology Journal. 2021;28:302-311. DOI: 10.5603/cj.a2019.0037.10.5603/CJ.a2019.0037807895630994181
  38. 38. Khatri P, Kasner SE. Ischemic Strokes After Cardiac Catheterization: Opportune Thrombolysis Candidates? Arch Neurol. 2006;63:817-821. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.63.6.817.10.1001/archneur.63.6.81716769862
  39. 39. Cuinet J, Garbagnati A, Rusca M, et al. Cardiogenic shock elicits acute inflammation, delayed eosinophilia, and depletion of immune cells in most severe cases. Sci Rep. 2020;10:7639. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64702-0.10.1038/s41598-020-64702-0720315732377009
  40. 40. Shpektor A. Cardiogenic shock: The role of inflammation. Acute Cardiac Care. 2010;12:115-118. DOI: 10.3109/17482941.2010.523705.10.3109/17482941.2010.52370521039083
  41. 41. Chandrasekhar J, Baber U, Sartori S, et al. Effect of Increasing Stent Length on 3-Year Clinical Outcomes in Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:53-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.11.020.10.1016/j.jcin.2017.11.02029301648
  42. 42. Claessen BE, Smits PC, Kereiakes DJ, et al. Impact of lesion length and vessel size on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus- versus paclitaxeleluting stents pooled analysis from the SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) and COMPARE (Second-generation everolimuseluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice) Randomized Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:1209-1215. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.016.10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.01622115661
  43. 43. Tamez H, Pinto D, Kirtane A, et al. Effect of Short Procedural Duration With Bivalirudin on Increased Risk of Acute Stent Thrombosis in Patients With STEMI. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:673-677. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5669.10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5669581502428249084
  44. 44. Moukarbel GV, Dakik HA. Diffuse coronary artery spasm induced by guidewire insertion. The Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2003;15:353-354.
  45. 45. Yunus I, Fasih A, Wang Y. The use of procalcitonin in the determination of severity of sepsis, patient outcomes and infection characteristics. PLOS ONE. 2018;13:e0206527. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206527.10.1371/journal.pone.0206527623529330427887
  46. 46. Bataille V, Ferrières J, Danchin N, et al. Increased mortality risk in diabetic patients discharged from hospital with insulin therapy after an acute myocardial infarction: Data from the FAST-MI 2005 registry. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019;8:218-230. doi: 10.1177/2048872617719639.10.1177/204887261771963928691497
  47. 47. Jiang YJ, Han WX, Gao C, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients in China: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e6647. Doi:10.1097/ MD.000000000000664710.1097/MD.0000000000006647541323028445265
  48. 48. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2017;39:119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
  49. 49. Bangalore S, Makani H, Radford M, et al. Clinical Outcomes with β-Blockers for Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Am J Med. 2014;127:939-953. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.05.032.10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.05.032
  50. 50. Harari R, Bangalore S. Beta-blockers after acute myocardial infarction: an old drug in urgent need of new evidence. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:3530-3532. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa436.10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa436
  51. 51. Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators, Yusuf S, Sleight P, et al. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:145-153. doi: 10.1056/ NEJM200001203420301.10.1056/NEJM200001203420301
  52. 52. Young J, Dunlap M, Pfeffer M, et al. Mortality and Morbidity Reduction with Candesartan in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction. Circulation. 2004;110:2618-2626. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000146819.43235. A9.10.1161/01.CIR.0000146819.43235.A9
  53. 53. Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ, et al. Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1893-1906. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032292.10.1056/NEJMoa032292
  54. 54. Evans M, Carrero J, Szummer K, et al. Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Myocardial Infarction Patients with Renal Dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1687-1697. doi: 10.1016/j. jacc.2016.01.050.10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.050
  55. 55. Sim HW, Zheng H, Richards AM, et al. Beta-blockers and reninangiotensin system inhibitors in acute myocardial infarction managed with in-hospital coronary revascularization. Sci Rep. 2020;10:15184. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72232-y.10.1038/s41598-020-72232-y
  56. 56. Olszanecka A, Reczek Ł, Schönborn M, et al. Stosowanie leków przeciwbólowych u pacjentów z chorobą niedokrwienną serca. Folia Cardiologica. 2018;13:283-288.10.5603/FC.2018.0065
  57. 57. Bentivoglio L, Leo L, Wolf N, Meister S. Frequency and importance of unprovoked coronary spasm in patients with angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1983;51:1067-1071. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90346-6.10.1016/0002-9149(83)90346-6
  58. 58. Wong A, Cheng A, Chan C, Lim YL. Cardiogenic shock caused by severe coronary artery spasm immediately after coronary stenting. Tex Heart Inst J. 2005;32:78–80.
  59. 59. Quintavalle C, Brenca M, De Micco F, et al. In vivo and in vitro assessment of pathways involved in contrast media-induced renal cells apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2011;2:e155. doi: 10.1038/ cddis.2011.38.10.1038/cddis.2011.38312211721562587
  60. 60. Husi H, Human C. Molecular determinants of acute kidney injury. J Inj Violence Res. 2015;7:75-86. doi:10.5249/jivr. v7i2.61510.5249/jivr
  61. 61. Stocker TJ, Abdel-Wahab M, Möllmann H, Deseive S, Massberg S, Hausleiter J. Trends and predictors of radiation exposure in percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECTION VIII study. EuroIntervention. 2022:EIJ-D-21-00856. doi: 10.4244/ EIJ-D-21-00856.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jce-2022-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2457-5518 | Journal ISSN: 2457-550X
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 13
Submitted on: Feb 7, 2022
|
Accepted on: Mar 29, 2022
|
Published on: Jun 14, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Mark Christopher Arokiaraj, published by Asociatia Transilvana de Terapie Transvasculara si Transplant KARDIOMED
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.