Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Analysis of Endometrial Cancer: A 10-Year Tertiary Care Experience Cover

Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Analysis of Endometrial Cancer: A 10-Year Tertiary Care Experience

Open Access
|Sep 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Baseline Clinicopathological Characteristics of Patients with Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma (n = 622).

Characteristicn (%)
Age
<60 years396 (63.7)
≥60 years226 (36.3)
Median age (years)56 (range 24–87)
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Mean BMI (kg/m2)32.8 ± 7.3
Underweight7 (1.1)
Normal weight64 (10.3)
Overweight143 (23.0)
Obesity class I184 (29.6)
Obesity class II135 (21.7)
Obesity class III89 (14.3)
Menopausal status
Pre-menopausal169 (27.2)
Post-menopausal453 (72.8)
FIGO Stage (2009)
IA275 (44.2)
IB169 (27.2)
II68 (10.9)
IIIA38 (6.1)
IIIB14 (2.3)
IIIC36 (5.8)
IV22 (3.5)
Myometrial invasion
<50%325 (52.3)
≥50%297 (47.7)
LVSI
Negative316 (50.8)
Focal25 (4.0)
Diffuse27 (4.3)
Unknown/Missing253 (40.7)
ER status
Positive135 (92.5)
Negative11 (7.5)
Unknown/Missing476 (76.5 of total cohort)

[i] Abbreviations: TAH+BSO-Total Abdominal Hysterectomy and Bilateral Salpingo-ophorectomy; FIGO-International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; BMI-Body Mass Index; LVSI-Lymph vascular Invasion; ER-Estrogen Receptor.

Table 2.

Treatment Characteristics.

Characteristicn (%)
Surgical Procedure
TAH + BSO587 (94.4)
Subtotal hysterectomy9 (1.4)
No surgery26 (4.2)
Lymph Node Dissection
Yes113 (18.2)
No509 (81.8)
Nodal Status
Negative586 (94.2)
Positive36 (5.8)
Adjuvant Radiotherapy (EBRT)
Yes356 (57.2)
No266 (42.8)
Brachytherapy
Yes377 (60.6)
No245 (39.4)
Concurrent Chemotherapy
Yes595 (95.7)
No27 (4.3)
Induction/Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Yes520 (83.6)
No102 (16.4)
Outcome
Alive561 (90.2)
Dead61 (9.8)
Relapse Status
No510 (82.0)
Yes112 (18.0)
Treatment at Relapse
Chemotherapy60 (9.6)
Radiotherapy18 (2.9)
Surgery11 (1.8)
Supportive care17 (2.7)
Not applicable514 (82.6)

[i] Abbreviations: TAH+BSO-Total Abdominal Hysterectomy and Bilateral Salpingo-ophorectomy.

Figure 1.

Overall survival stratified by FIGO stage.

Kaplan–Meier curves illustrating overall survival (OS) according to FIGO stage (I–IV). Survival outcomes differed significantly across stages (log-rank p < 0.0001), with progressively worse survival observed with advancing stage. Patients with stage I disease demonstrated the most favorable survival, whereas stage IV disease was associated with the poorest outcomes. Tick marks represent censored observations, and numbers at risk at prespecified time intervals are displayed below the x-axis.

Figure 2.

Overall survival stratified by FIGO stage III subgroups (IIIA, IIIB, IIIC).

Kaplan–Meier curves demonstrating overall survival among patients with stage III endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, subclassified into stage IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC. Stage IIIC shows comparatively poorer survival outcomes, with an estimated median overall survival of approximately 69 months. Survival differences between subgroups were statistically significant (log-rank p = 0.0055). Tick marks indicate censored observations. The number of patients at risk at specified time intervals is displayed below the plot.

Figure 3.

Overall survival stratified by nodal status.

Kaplan–Meier curves demonstrating overall survival (OS) according to nodal status in patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Patients with node-positive disease exhibited significantly inferior survival compared with node-negative patients (log-rank p < 0.0001). The median OS for the node-positive cohort was approximately 69 months, while median OS was not reached in the node-negative group. Tick marks indicate censored observations. Numbers at risk at prespecified time intervals are provided below the x-axis.

Table 3.

Univariate Cox Regression Analysis for Overall Survival.

VariableHR (95% CI)p-value
FIGO Stage<0.001
Stage IReference
Stage II2.26 (1.07–4.79)
Stage III3.08 (1.68–5.63)
Stage IV6.69 (2.92–15.3)
Nodal Status<0.001
NegativeReference
Positive4.98 (2.64–9.40)
Tumor Grade0.072
Grade IReference
Grade II1.09 (0.62–1.90)
Grade III2.40 (1.17–4.93)
Myometrial Invasion0.101
<50%Reference
≥50%1.53 (0.92–2.54)
Age (per year)1.02 (0.99–1.04)0.140
BMI (per unit)0.94 (0.90–0.97)<0.001
Menopausal Status0.124
Pre-menopausalReference
Post-menopausal1.56 (0.87–2.79)

[i] Abbreviations: FIGO-International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; BMI-Body Mass Index; HR-Hazard Ratio; CI-Confidence Interval.

Table 4.

Multivariate Cox Regression Analysis for Overall Survival.

VariableHR (95% CI)p-value
FIGO Stage
Stage IReference
Stage II2.46 (1.14–5.31)0.022
Stage III1.14 (0.42–3.06)0.800
Stage IV5.82 (2.43–13.9)<0.001
Nodal Status
NegativeReference
Positive5.89 (2.00–17.3)0.001
Tumor Grade
Grade IReference
Grade II0.71 (0.39–1.31)0.300
Grade III1.18 (0.52–2.68)0.700
Age (per year)1.03 (1.00–1.06)0.023
BMI (per unit)0.95 (0.91–0.99)0.009
Myometrial Invasion
<50%Reference
≥50%1.02 (0.56–1.84)0.940

[i] Abbreviations: FIGO-International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; BMI-Body Mass Index; HR-Hazard Ratio; CI-Confidence Interval.

Language: English
Page range: 97 - 104
Published on: Sep 1, 2026
Published by: Shakuat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Sadia Anjum, Anas Tahseen, Aqueel Shahid, Tabinda Sadaf, Anusha Haider, Abdul Subhan, Rameesha Jahangir, Fajar Rafi Ranjha, published by Shakuat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.