Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Pancreato-duodenal cancers in Pakistan: Patterns of presentation, disease burden and outcomes at a tertiary cancer facility Cover

Pancreato-duodenal cancers in Pakistan: Patterns of presentation, disease burden and outcomes at a tertiary cancer facility

Open Access
|Aug 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Patient flow at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, Pakistan.

Figure 2.

Selection of study population.

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics.

VARIABLESVALUES
Age – Mean53 ±/− 13.62
Age – CategoryBelow 60 years629 (73%)
Above 60 years232 (27%)
GenderMale585 (68%)
Female276 (32%)
ECOGECOG 0338 (39.3%)
ECOG 1470 (54.6%)
Co-morbiditiesSmoking160 (18.6%)
Hypertension149 (17.4%)
Diabetes mellitus139 (16.1%)
IHD32 (3.7%)
Presenting symptomsJaundice556 (64.6%)
Abdominal pain230 (26.7%)
Weight loss49 (5.7%)
Vomiting26 (3%)
Table 2.

Peri-operative Characteristics.

VARIABLESVALUES
Pre-operative ERCPYes706 (82%)
No155 (18%)
EUSYes528 (61.4%)
No333 (38.6%)
Histological DiagnosisDuodenal265 (30.8%)
Peri-ampullary398 (46.2%)
Pancreatic154 (17.9%)
Distal bile duct44 (5.1%)
TNM-stageStage 1106 (12.4%)
Stage 2128 (14.9%)
Stage 3155 (18%)
ASA gradeASA II279 (72%)
ASA III77 (20%)
ASA IV31 (8%)
Surgical procedurePancreatico-duodenectomy254 (65.4%)
Distal pancreatectomy56 (14.4%)
Total pancreatectomy4 (1%)
Palliative Bypass74 (19%)
ComplicationsSSI90 (26.6%)
POPF (grade b)33 (9.8%)
CD >372 (21.1%)
Re-look laparotomy17 (4.7%)
Margin statusR0317 (93%)
R117 (5%)
R27 (2%)
Mortality30 days7 (2.1%)
90 days18 (4.6%)
Adjuvant chemotherapyYes222 (65%)
No119 (35%)
RecurrenceStage I12.5%
Stage II27.11%
Stage III30.1%
Figure 3.

Surgical volume per year – This graph shows significant increase in number since 2015 onwards.

Figure 4.

Kaplan-Meier Overall Survival (OS) curves-based on achievement of Textbook Outcomes (TO). Those patients that achieved TO showed better DFS compared to those patients who did not achieve TO.

Figure 5.

Kaplan-Meier Disease Free Survival (DFS) curves-based on achievement of Textbook Outcomes (TO). Those patients that achieved TO showed better DFS compared to those patients who did not achieve TO.

Figure 6.

Kaplan–Meier overall survival (OS) curves comparing patients according to primary tumor site, including duodenal, periampullary, and pancreatic tumors. Patients with duodenal tumors demonstrated the most favorable overall survival, with survival probabilities remaining relatively stable throughout the follow-up period. Patients with periampullary tumors showed intermediate survival outcomes, with a gradual decline in survival over time. In contrast, patients with pancreatic tumors exhibited the poorest prognosis, with a marked reduction in overall survival during the early and intermediate follow-up periods.

Table 3.

Cox regression analysis for OS in pancreato-duodenal cancers.

VariableUnivariate HR (95% CI)p-valueMultivariate HR (95% CI)p-value
Pancreatic Fistula:
  No Fistula0.770.037
  Grade A0.450 (0.141–1.443)0.1790.272 (0.079–0.937)0.039
  Grade B0.213 (0.056–0.804)0.220.133 (0.033–0.536)0.004
  Grade C0.302 (0.076–1.210)0.0910.234 (0.05–0.972)0.046
Margin Status0.466 (0.168–1.295)0.1430.306 (0.138–0.677)0.003
Lymph Nodes (LN)0.699 (0.437–1.117)0.1330.846 (0.575–1.244)0.395
Co-morbidities0.630 (0.393–1.010)0.0550.695 (0.469–1.030)0.070
Tumour Site:0.0280.598
  Duodenal
  Periampullary0.398 (0.120–1.317)0.1310.648 (0.244–1.722)0.384
  Pancreatic0.530 (0.323–0.869)0.0120.840 (0.540–1.306)0.438
Biliary Stent0.799 (0.419–1.523)0.4951.195 (0.545–2.621)0.657
Jaundice0.779 (0.372–1.630)0.5070.713 (0.279–1.822)0.479
Table 4.

Cox regression analysis for DFS in pancreato-duodenal cancers.

VariableUnivariate HR (95% CI)p-valueMultivariate HR (95% CI)p-value
Pancreatic Fistula:
  No Fistula0.2810.486
  Grade A1.863 (0.259–13.397)0.5371.473 (0.201–10.820)0.703
  Grade B1.469 (0.197–10.930)0.7071.094 (0.144–8.321)0.931
  Grade C0.982 (0.123–7.856)0.9860.947 (0.11–7.665)0.959
Margin Status0.252 (0.120–0.528)<0.0010.306 (0.137–0.684)0.004
Lymph Nodes (LN)0.793 (0.546–1.152)0.2230.828 (0.561–1.223)0.343
Co-morbidities0.672 (0.461–0.979)0.0380.719 (0.484–1.069)0.103
Tumour Site:
  Duodenal0.1100.726
  Periampullary0.496 (0.194–1.272)0.1450.681 (0.255–1.819)0.444
  Pancreatic0.673 (0.445–1.018)0.0610.899 (0.574–1.406)0.640
Biliary Stent0.895 (0.518–1.544)0.6891.215 (0.548–2.697)0.632
Jaundice0.696 (0.381–1.271)0.2380.681 (0.261–1.776)0.432
Figure 7.

Kaplan–Meier overall survival (OS) curves stratified according to tumor grade (high, intermediate, and low grade). Patients with low-grade tumors demonstrated the best overall survival outcomes, maintaining high survival probabilities throughout the duration of follow-up.

Figure 8.

Kaplan-Meier Disease Free Survival (DFS) curves based on grade of NET. Patients with low-grade tumors demonstrated superior disease-free survival.

Language: English
Page range: 85 - 96
Published on: Aug 3, 2026
Published by: Shakuat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Sibgha Aimon, Muhammad Anas-Bin-Akhtar, Syed Tatheer Abbas, Jamshed Ali, Farhana Badar, Muhammad Aasim Yusuf, Aamir Ali Syed, Syed Irfan Kabir, published by Shakuat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.