Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Does Tumor Grade Have any Prognostic Significance in Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Clinicopathological Study Cover

Does Tumor Grade Have any Prognostic Significance in Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Clinicopathological Study

Open Access
|Mar 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Chromophobe tumor grades. A, Chromophobe tumor grade 1 (H&E 20X). B, Chromophobe tumor grade 1 (H&E 40X). C, Chromophobe tumor grade 2 (H&E 20X). D, Chromophobe tumor grade 2 (H&E 40X). E, Chromophobe tumor grade 3 (H&E 20X). F, Chromophobe tumor grade 3 (H&E 40X).

Figure 2.

A, Sarcomatoid differentiation with area of necrosis (H&E 40X). B, Necrosis (H&E 40X).

Table 1.

Summary of Clinical and Pathological Features for 51 Patients with Chromophobe RCC.

FeatureSub-categoryMean (Median; Range)
Age at surgery (years)46 (47; 25–70)
Maximum tumor size (cm)9.6 (8.5; 4–17.5)
GenderFemale31 (60.8%)
N (%)Male20 (39.2%)
2017 Primary tumor classification N (%)pT1a2 (2%)
pT1b16 (31%)
pT2a10 (19%)
pT2b12 (23%)
pT3a11 (21%)
pT3b0
pT3c0
pT40
2017 regional lymph node involvement N (%)pNX and pN051 (100%)
pN10
Distant Metastasis N (%)pMX51 (100%)
pM10
2017 TNM stage groupings N (%)I18 (35%)
II22 (43%)
III11 (21%)
IV0
Sarcomatoid Differentiation N (%)Yes2 (4%)
No49 (96%)
Coagulative tumor necrosis N (%)0%43 (84%)
1% to 10%6 (11%)
>10%2 (4%)
Chromophobe RCC grade N (%)14 (7.8%)
231 (60.8%)
316 (31.4%)
Fuhrman Nucleolar Grade N (%)126 (51%)
220 (39.2%)
32 (3.9%)
43 (5.9%)

[i] N (Number of cases); RCC (Renal Cell Carcinoma).

Figure 3.

Chromophobe tumor grade. A, Overall survival (months). B, Recurrence-free survival (months). C, Distant metastasis-free survival (months).

Figure 4.

Fuhrman nucleolar grade. A, Overall survival (months). B, Recurrence-free survival (months). C, Distant metastasis-free survival (months).

Figure 5.

Overall survival of adverse outcome with regard to Chromophobe tumor grade.

Figure 6.

Overall survival in relation to adverse outcomes concerning Fuhrman nucleolar grade.

Figure 7.

Association of the novel chromophobe tumor grade (CTG) with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with adverse outcome (local recurrence, metastasis, and/or death owing to disease).

Table 2.

Correlation of Chromophobe grading system with coagulative tumor necrosis, sarcomatoid differentiation and TNM stage.

Novel ChRCC GradeTNM stage groupingsSarcomatoid DifferentiationTumor necrosis (%age)
N (%)Stage I N (%)Stage II N (%)Stage III N (%)Present N (%)Absent N (%)Group 1 (0%)Group 2 (1%–10%)Group 3 (>10%)
Grade 1
4 (7.8%)
1 (25%)2 (50%)1 (25%)0 (0%)4 (100%)4 (100%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Grade 2
31 (60.8%)
11 (33%)15 (45%)5 (15%)0 (0%)31 (100%)27 (87%)2 (6%)2 (6%)
Grade 3
16 (31.4%)
6 (37%)5 (31%)5 (31%)2 (12%)14 (88%)0 (0%)14 (87.5%)2 (12.5%)

[i] N (Number of cases)

Table 3.

Correlation of the Fuhrman nucleolar grading system with coagulative tumor necrosis, sarcomatoid differentiation and TNM stage.

Fuhrman Nucleolar GradeTNM stage groupingsSarcomatoid DifferentiationTumor necrosis (%age)
N (%)Stage I N (%)Stage II N (%)Stage III N (%)Present N (%)Absent N (%)Group 1 (0%)Group 2 (1%–10%)Group 3 (>10%)
Grade 1
26 (51%)
9 (34%)13 (50%)4 (15%)0 (0%)26 (100%)22 (77%)2 (8%)4 (15%)
Grade 2
20 (39.2%)
7 (35%)8 (40%)5 (25%)0 (0%)20 (100%)17 (85%)0 (0%)3 (15%)
Grade 3
2 (3.9%)
1 (50%)0 (0%)1 (50%)1 (50%)1 (50%)2 (100%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Grade 4
3 (5.9%)
1 (33%)1 (33%)1 (33%)1 (33%)2 (67%)2 (67%)0 (0%)1 (33%)

[i] N (Number of cases).

Language: English
Page range: 51 - 61
Published on: Mar 12, 2026
Published by: Shakuat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Shariqah Sadaf, Sajid Mushtaq, Madiha Syed, Usman Hassan, Mudassar Hussain, Asif Loya, Maryam Hameed, Umer Nisar Sheikh, published by Shakuat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.