References
- Čech, R. (2014). Language and ideology: quantitative thematic analysis of new year speeches given by Czechoslovak and Czech presidents (1949–2011). Quality & Quantity, 48(2), pp. 899–910.
- David, J., Čech, R., Davidová Glogarová, J., Radková, L., and Šústková, H. (2013). Slovo a text v historickém kontextu – perspektivy historickosemantické analýzy jazyka. Brno: Host, 324 p.
- Gerdes, K., Guillaume, B., Kahane, S., and Perrier, G. (2018). SUD or Surface-Syntactic Universal Dependencies: An annotation scheme near-isomorphic to UD. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Universal Dependencies (UDW 2018), pp. 66–74, Brussels, Belgium. Association for Computational Linguistics. Accessible at: https://aclanthology.org/W18-6008/.
- Jičinský, M., and Marek, J. (2017). New year’s day speeches of Czech presidents: phonetic analysis and text analysis. In: K. Saeed – W. Homenda – R. Chaki (eds.): Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management. Cham: Springer, pp. 110–121.
- Jing, Y., and Liu, H. (2015). Mean Hierarchical Distance Augmenting Mean Dependency Distance. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2015), pp. 161–170, Uppsala, Sweden. Accessible at: https://aclanthology.org/W15-2119/.
- Kubát, M., Mačutek, J., and Čech, R. (2021). Communists spoke differently: An analysis of Czechoslovak and Czech annual presidential speeches. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 36(1), pp. 138–152.
- Kuznetsova, J. (2016). Modern Russian history through the New Year addresses. In: S. Kübler – M. Dickinson (eds.): Proceedings of Computer Linguistics Fest 2016. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, pp. 34–38.
- Lim, E. T. (2004). Five trends in presidential rhetoric: an analysis of rhetoric from George Washington to Bill Clinton. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 32(2), pp, 328–348.
- Liu, F. (2012). Genre analysis of American presidential inaugural speech. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(11), pp. 2407–2411.
- Liu, H. (2008). Dependency distance as a metric of language comprehension difficulty. Journal of Cognitive Science, 9(2), pp. 159–191.
- Mann, H. B., and Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a Test of Whether One of Two Random Variables Is Stochastically Larger than the Other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, pp. 50–60.
- Straka, M. (2018). UDPipe 2.0 Prototype at CoNLL 2018 UD Shared Task. In Proceedings of CoNLL 2018: The SIGNLL Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 197–207. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Accessible at: https://aclanthology.org/K18-2020/.
- Savoy, J. (2010). Lexical analysis of US political speeches. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 17(2), pp. 123–141.
- Savoy, J. (2016). Text representation strategies: an example with the State of the Union addresses. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(8), pp. 1858–1870.
- Shapiro, S. S., and Wilk, M. B. (1965). An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples). Biometrika, 52, pp. 591–611.
- Tuzzi, A., Popescu, I.-I., and Altmann, G. (2010). Quantitative Analysis of Italian Texts. Lüdenscheid: RAM-Verlag, 161 p.
- Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), pp. 115–140.
- Zeman, D. et al. (2024). Universal Dependencies 2.15, LINDAT/CLARIAH-CZ digital library at the Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics (ÚFAL), Prague: Charles University. Accessible at: http://hdl.handle.net/11234/1-5787.