Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Expressing Measure in Czech (A Corpus-Based Study) Cover
By: Marie Mikulová  
Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Abzianidze, L. et al. (2017). The Parallel Meaning Bank: Towards a Multilingual Corpus of Translations Annotated with Compositional Meaning Representations. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Valencia, pages 242–247.
  2. Baranescu, L. et al. (2013). Abstract Meaning Representation for Sembanking. In Proceedings of the 7th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, Sophia, pages 178–186.
  3. Barwise, J., and Cooper, R. (1981). Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, pages 159–219.
  4. Bos, J. (2021): Quantification Annotation in Discourse Representation. In The 17th Joint ACL – ISO Workshop on Interoperable Semantic Annotation, Groningen.
  5. Bunt, H. et al. (2022). Quantification Annotation in ISO 24617-12. In Proceedings of the 13th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Marseille, pages 3407–3416.
  6. Gil, D. (1993). Nominal and verbal quantification. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 46.4, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pages 275–317.
  7. Gysel van, J. E. L. et al. (2021). Designing a Uniform Meaning Representation for Natural Language Processing. Künstl Intell 35, Springer-Verlag, pages 343–360.
  8. Hajič, J. et al. (2020a). Prague Dependency Treebank – Consolidated 1.0. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Marseille, pages 5208–5218.
  9. Hajič, J. et al. (2020b). Prague Dependency Treebank – Consolidated 1.0. LINDATCLARIAH, Prague: Charles University. Accessible at: http://hdl.handle.net/11234/1-3185.
  10. Hladiš, F. (1956). K významu a užití příslovce řádově. Naše řeč, 48(4), pages 254–256.
  11. Kamp, H. et al. (2011). Discourse Representation Theory. In Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 15, Elsevier, MIT, pages 125–394.
  12. Keenan, E. L. (2012). The Quantifier Questionnaire. In Handbook of Quantifiers in Natural Language. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 90, Dordrecht: Springer.
  13. Kopečný, F. (1953). Kvantitativní přívlastek a určení míry. Slovo a slovesnost, 14(3), pages 115–121.
  14. Mikulová, M. et al. (2006). Annotation on the tectogrammatical level in the Prague Dependency Treebank. Annotation manual. Technical report, 2006/30, Prague: Charles University.
  15. Mikulová, M., and Bejček E. (2017). Prague Database of Forms and Functions 1.0. LINDAT/CLARIAH-CZ, Prague: Charles University. Accessible at: http://hdl.handle.net/11234/1-2542.
  16. Mikulová, M., and Panevová, J. (2021). Formy a funkce okolnostních určení v češtině. Určení prostorová a časová. Prague: Charles University.
  17. Panevová, J. (1980). Formy a funkce ve stavbě české věty. Prague: Academia.
  18. Steedman, M. (2001). The Syntactic Process. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  19. Šindlerová, J., and Štěpánková, B. (2021). Between Adverbs and Particles: A Corpus Study of Selected Intensifiers. Jazykovedný časopis, 72(2), pages 444–453.
  20. Vondráček, M. (1999). Příslovce a částice – hranice slovního druhu. Naše řeč, 82(2), pages 72–78.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jazcas-2023-0029 | Journal eISSN: 1338-4287 | Journal ISSN: 0021-5597
Language: English
Page range: 108 - 118
Published on: Dec 25, 2023
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2023 Marie Mikulová, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.