References
- Anthony, L. (2013). A critical look at software tools in corpus linguistics. Linguistic Research, 30(2), pages 141–161.
- Bard, E. G., Robertson, D., and Sorace, A. (1996). Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language, 72(1), pages 32–68.
- Bates, D. (2005). Fitting Linear Mixed Models in R Using the lme4 package. R News, 5(1), pages 27–30.
- Borsley, R. D. (2004). An Approach to English Comparative Correlatives. In S. Müller (ed.): Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Center for Computational Linguistics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, pages 70–92. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
- Bresnan, J. (2007). Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. In S. Featherston – W. Sternefeld (eds.): Roots: linguistics in search of its evidential base (Studies in Generative Grammar 96), pages 75–96. Berlin: De Gruyter.
- Bresnan, J., and Ford, M. (2010). Predicting Syntax: Processing Dative Constructions in American and Australian Varieties of English. Language, 86(1), pages 168–213.
- Brunner, T., and Hoffmann, T. (2020). The way-construction in World Englishes. English World-Wide, 41(1), pages 1–32.
- Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Cowart, W. (1997). Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Culicover, P. W., and Jackendoff, R. (1999). The View from the Periphery: The English Comparative Correlative. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(4), pages 543–571.
- Dikken, M. den (2003). Comparative correlatives and verb second. Manuscript. CUNY Graduate Centre, ms.
- Dikken, M. den (2005). Comparative Correlatives Comparatively. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(4), pages 497–532.
- Gries, S. Th. (2009). Statistics for Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs: 208). 1st ed. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
- Hoffmann, T. (2011). Preposition Placement in English: A Usage-based Approach (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
- Hoffmann, T. (2013). Obtaining introspective acceptability judgements. In M. Krug – J. Schlüter (eds.): Research Methods in Language Variation and Change, pages 99–118. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
- Hoffmann, T. (2019). English Comparative Correlatives: Diachronic and Synchronic Variation at the Lexicon-Syntax Interface (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
- Hoffmann, T., Brunner, T., and Horsch, J. (2020). English Comparative Correlative Constructions: A Usage-based account. Open Linguistics, 6(1), pages 196–215.
- Hoffmann, T., Horsch, J., and Brunner, T. (2019). The More Data, The Better: A Usagebased Account of the English Comparative Correlative Construction. Cognitive, Linguistics, 30(1), pages 1–36.
- Keller, F., and Alexopoulou, T. (2005). A crosslinguistic, experimental study of resumptive pronouns and that-trace effects. In B. G. Bara – L. Barsalou – M. Bucciarelli (eds.): Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 1120–1125.
- Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., and Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), pages 1–26.
- Kuznetsova, A, Brockhoff, P. B. and Christensen, R. H. B. (2020). lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effects models (lmer objects of lme4 package). R package version 3.1-3. Accessible at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest.
- Kuznetsova, A., Christensen, R. H. B., Bavay, C., and Brockhoff P. B. (2015). Automated mixed ANOVA modeling of sensory and consumer data. Food Quality and Preference 40, pages 31–38.
- Szmrecsányi, B., Grafmiller, J., Heller, B., and Röthlisberger, M. (2016). Around the world in three alternations: Modelling syntactic variation in varieties of English. English World-Wide, 37, pages 109–137.